-
Attorney Elad Naveh -- FOIA Officer;
-
Attorney Orly Adas -- CEO, and
-
Attorney Dean Livneh -- Legal Advisor.
Immediately upon receipt and examination of the FOIA response, it was deemed false and misleading -- serious fraud by legal State officers.
Therefore, reply was consequently sent to the Committee. The reply detailed objections to the FOIA response, and asked for corrected response within 14 days. The Committee has not responded to this date.
And yet, the FOIA response provided some interesting information: The FOIA response purported that integrity of the systems (and with it integrity of the 2013 and 2015 elections) depended almost entirely on a single, previously unmentioned state employee -- Lazar Dudovich. However, regardless of the explicit FOIA request, certifications by Mr Dudovich of the system's integrity and security were not provided with the FOIA response.
Supreme Court Justices, who served as Committee Chairs -- incompetent and/or corrupt?
By law, a Supreme Court justice serves as Chairman of the Central Election Committee. Following is the list of justices, who served in such capacity since 2004 (approximate date of initiation of development of "Democracy" IT system of the Central Election Committee):
Figure 7: Supreme Court Justices, who chaired the Central Election Committee since 2004 (approximate time of initiation of the new computerization project): Jacob Turkel, Dorit Beinisch, Eliezer Rivlin, Ayala Procaccia, Miriam Naor, Elyakim Rubinstein, Salim Joubran, Esther Hayut. The justices are suspected of incompetence, misprision, or collusion...
______
Therefore, the nature of conduct of these justices in their capacity as Chairs of the Committee begs for questions" The answer is relatively clear: Such justices should be suspected of incompetence, misprision, or collusion...
One should recall that the Supreme Court justices engage in routine fraud and perversion of court records in the Supreme Court's IT system as well. [4] Moreover, Supreme Court presiding justices and judges, who are Directors of Administration of Courts (first and foremost former Presiding Justice Aharon Barak and former Director of the Administration of Courts Boaz Okon) oversaw during the 2000s first decade the development of a new fraudulent case management system -- Net-HaMishpat - for the district and magistrate courts. Of note, on a previous inquiry, pertaining to security of IT systems of the Supreme Court, the Shin-Bet responded in a similar fashion -- denying any responsibility.
Therefore, misprision or collusion by justices of the Supreme Court in computer fraud in the Central Election Committee is not inconceivable.
It should be noted that in both cases -- the Central Election Committee and the Supreme Court - the corresponding agencies (the Committee and the Administration of Courts) refused to duly answer on FOIA requests: Who was charged with security of their IT systems.
Large-scale fraud in e-government in Israel -- unannounced regime change
Already the UN Human Rights Council Professional Staff Report in the 2013 review of Human Rights in Israel notes: "Lack of integrity in electronic record systems of the Supreme Court, the district courts and the detainees courts in Israel".
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
1
1
