Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 43 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds      

CAPITALISM - THE END TIME?

By By Tom Dennen  Posted by Tom Dennen (about the submitter)       (Page 3 of 13 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   12 comments

Tom Dennen
Message Tom Dennen

We are now in the ‘end time’ of a 300-year Capitalist era of uninterrupted growth.

Growth is the lynchpin of Capitalist economics – “you have to grow”.

 

Yet there are only about as many people living in the West today, in the First World, as there ever will be and the number of newborn babies – the original reason or driver for economic growth – is dwindling and with that, the biggest bubble of them all, the population bubble, is bursting.

 

Growth is inherent to the system, unconsciously embedded in it, because, for the last three hundred years, the First World population has been growing and that growth was driving Capitalsm: growth is … “the way it is.”

 

For growth read, 'increased annual profits for investors'!

 

I don’t think even Adam Smith looked further than the New World for growth.

 

His Hidden Hand? A burgeoning, never-ending stream of new-born customers every year until growth morphed into the ‘correct’ recipe for success: a demand: If you were not growing there was something wrong with the way you did business, all those new feet to make shoes for? Can’t fail!

 

Which is the reason you see all those ‘enemies’, those Arabs wearing Nike sneakers  - because that’s where populations are still growing and Nike, like all Capitalist concerns, is locked into the growth paradigm (“the System”) because of upward shareholder pressure (which quite deliberately stays unaware of the fact that the growth driver is gone), so Nike the Capitalist sells shoes to ‘the enemy’ because the system – Capitalism – says he still has to grow profits.

 

I repeat this often because It is important to completely understand that growth in Capitalism began, not as a necessity but as a given: Capital growth originated with and paralleled the growth of the population in which it operated – Capitalism itself ‘simply’ grew along with the driving force of increasing numbers.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Tom Dennen Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Tom is a contributor to public debate on issues affecting our survival; works with a London and a South African think tank, is a working journalist and author.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Elliot Spitzer - The First Patsy in the Meltdown

The End of Capitalism

OLD RACIST WAR MOVIES - LIVE ON SKY NEWS

What We Learned (or Didn't) from Recent Economic History

ON THE ECONOMIC BRINK!

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend