Send a Tweet
- Advertisement -
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 22 Share on Twitter 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News    H2'ed 7/25/19

'2016 Deja vu all over again; Corporate Media's Trashing of Bernie Sanders Starts Anew

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   4 comments
Author 63
Message Dave Lindorff
Become a Fan
  (88 fans)
- Advertisement -

By Dave Lindorff


Bernie Sanders for President
Bernie Sanders for President
(Image by Phil Roeder)
  Details   DMCA

- Advertisement -


In 2016, we learned that the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton Campaign, even before the primary season began, conspired to sabotage the campaign of her leading opponent for the presidential nomination, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT). The conspiracy, that ranged from obtaining campaign debate questions in advance for Clinton and front-loading primaries in states where she could pile up an imposing lead to getting a complicit liberal media to count pledged but unelected and legally uncommitted "super delegates" as being already in Clinton's delegate total (making the Sanders campaign appear quixotic) and also to plant ill-documented and speciously argued hit pieces in news media (including the NY Times and Washington Post) willing to support the effort.

Now, as Sanders' campaign appears to be steadily gaining on the favored establishment candidates, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and Pete Buttigieg, this corrupt effort to sabotage the Democrats' most progressive and most electable candidate, Sanders, is starting up again.

- Advertisement -

Case in point: an opinion article by Antony Davies and James R Harrigan that ran in the Philadelphia Inquirer 's opinion section today under the headline "Wage hypocrisy by Sanders?" The gist of the two author's argument is that Sanders, who is calling on the campaign trail for a $15/hour federal minimum wage, is a "hypocrite" because he's only paying his own campaign staff a minimum salary of"$36,000 a year. Now that might seem pretty decent compensation for people many of whom would probably be doing their campaign jobs for free if need be (as many do on such campaigns), but Davies and Harrigan, while calculating accurately that for a 40-hour workweek such a salary works out to $17/hr, add, "as is common for campaign workers, and salaried employees more generally, these workers almost always work more than 40 hours per week." They add, with no evidence to prove people are doing it, "For a campaign worker who clocks 50 to 60 hours, $36,000 a year hits between $11 and $13 per hour."

Gee. That sounds terrible, except for the fact that this is a political campaign, not a grinding, demoralizing desk job in a windowless office of some corporate hive. But more importantly and to the point, most Americans who slave away at salaried jobs simply don't get overtime, and under federal employment law such as it is, have no right to claim it.

But here's the real problem with this article: The authors don't identify themselves as libertarian ideologues engaged in a long-term obsessive attack on Sanders and other self-described socialists. As a pair, they have a long back-list of articles going back over a year specifically targeting Sanders' progressive economic ideas with headlines like:

"Paying Teachers What They are Worth" (an attack on Sanders' call for higher pay for teachers that ends up to be an attack on teachers unions and job tenure)

"The Real Story Behind Amazon's Taxes"(an attack on Sanders' criticizing Amazon and its founder Jeff Bezos paying no federal tax, which turns out to be an attack on Social Security and that falsely claims Sanders backed laws that allow Amazon and other companies and their owners to dodge taxes by deducting their losses and investments in prior years from current income.)

"The Billionaires versus the Politicians"(This is an attack on Elizabeth Warren, Sanders and AOC for calling for taxing the wealth of the nation's hundreds of billionaires and multimillionaires. The two authors argue that billionaires "earned" their wealth, ignoring the reality that many, like billionaire poseur Donald Trump inherited it and expect to expect to pass their hoard on to their offspring, and then conclude, "So ask yourself, who represents the bigger threat? The 584 billionaires who offer us things in exchange for our money, and whom we can walk away from at any time by shopping elsewhere? Or the 535 representatives and senators who take our money by threat of force?")

- Advertisement -

And so on"

I have no objection to such political hacks writing such screeds, but they should be honest about their real identities and agendas, not posing as neutral academics. In Davies' and Harrigan's case, they are clearly hiding who they are from their readers, and perhaps their inattentive editors too.

In the Inquirer commentary, they are self-identified in their bios this way:

Anthony Davis: Assciate. Professor of economics at Duquesne University.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Rate It | View Ratings

Dave Lindorff Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Dave Lindorff is a founding member of the collectively-owned, journalist-run online newspaper www.thiscantbehappening.net. He is a columnist for Counterpunch, is author of several recent books ("This Can't Be Happening! Resisting the (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Israel's Gaza Atrocities Recall America's Atrocities in Vietnam

Supreme Court Junket King Scalia Dies While Vacationing with Wealthy Patrons at Private West Texas Getaway

Looming climate catastrophe?: A Rapidly Warming Arctic Could Loose a Methane Climate Bomb Causing Extinction in 9 Years

Something's happening here: Clinton's Crumbling, Bernie's Surging and a 'Political Revolution' May Be in the Offing

The Case for Impeachment of President Barack Obama

Barack Obama: Manchurian Candidate Version 2.0

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

2 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments


jim smith

Become a Fan
Author 503570

(Member since Sep 15, 2015), 119 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

I am surprised you also did not mention that Bernie Sanders has been and still are negotiating with his people. This is not the case of Bernie acting like a dictator or being a hypocrite.



Submitted on Friday, Jul 26, 2019 at 10:50:00 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Dave Lindorff

Become a Fan
Author 63

(Member since Nov 18, 2005), 88 fans, 1196 articles, 117 quicklinks, 1060 comments, 1 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to jim smith:   New Content

Excellent point. No other campaign does anything like this to live their principles.

I'm wondering whether the employees who are publicly criticizing Sanders were plants by the GOP or possibly the DNC -- people who got hired with the intention of sabotaging the campaign later.


Dave Lindorff


Submitted on Friday, Jul 26, 2019 at 12:04:56 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

jim smith

Become a Fan
Author 503570

(Member since Sep 15, 2015), 119 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Dave Lindorff:   New Content

The place where I got my information suggested that. Honestly I don't totally believe that. But it is a possibility (10 - 30 percent chance at least).

(it is also possible that the people complaining just wanted a quick buck and saw an opportunity to get it.)

Either way, the reporters are doing a poor job in researching the story. That I agree 100 hundred percent.

Submitted on Friday, Jul 26, 2019 at 1:53:46 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
IndentIndentIndent

Dave Lindorff

Become a Fan
Author 63

(Member since Nov 18, 2005), 88 fans, 1196 articles, 117 quicklinks, 1060 comments, 1 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to jim smith:   New Content

It's certainly a cheap shot to attack Sanders because some employees of his campaign are bitching that he's not paying them more without checking to see what the competition is paying their staffmembers. How about Elizabeth Warren or Joe Biden? How about Trump? How about Buttigieg? My guess is none is paying her or his staff what Sanders is offering. But none of these reporters are even investigating. They're just going for fast, easy, and snarky pieces.

Submitted on Friday, Jul 26, 2019 at 2:17:42 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment