Kindig went on to insist that Bush will be favorably compared to other wartime presidents:
"His willingness to stand firm against the forces of terror compares favorably with FDR and Truman."
Stand firm against terrorism?
If I recall, Osama Bin Laden is still on the loose.
In fact, Bush has constantly lost sight of the true objectives behind the War on Terror, beginning with turning of his capitalistic oilmonger eyes on Iraq, a country where none of the terrorists who bombed on that fateful day even resided in.
The other day, I talked with a soldier friend of mine who had returned home from Iraq for a short couple of weeks break.
We talked about a number of different things not currently being shown on the media stations, but one part of our conversation that stood out the most (well, there were a lot of things, but I do not have enough space) was the low moral running through the troops stationed over in Iraq.
"I used to support Bush when I first joined," he said. "But now, I am not so sure anymore. We are not fighting a war. We are fighting a gang war."
Do you realize that the soldiers have to drive around the city and wait for someone to ambush them before striking out at the "terrorists?"
Imagine trying to send the armed forces into New Orleans to stop the gang violence that is bleeding rampant through the city—welcome to the world of Iraq.
"How can you fight something like that?" he asked.
Of course, this does not include the billions of taxpayer dollars that our government is wasting on reconstructing a country the fanatics are hell-bent on blowing it up.
Talk about a bad investment.
"I think his commitment to growth, capitalism and self-reliance on energy will be his long-lasting legacy. His commitment to the protection of life, including the unborn, will be a stand against which future presidents will be remembered," Kindig explained.
Self-reliance on energy? What exactly does that mean?
According to a recent Supreme Court ruling, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is now required to actually punish criminals violating air emission standards once again. It seems the Bush administration had been using their puppet strings on the political minds within the EPA, and they mysteriously abandon their mandating on certain auto emissions as air pollutants.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
