423 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 67 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 8/30/13

The White House, The President "Can Go It Alone" in Attacking Syria

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   No comments

Dave Lefcourt
Message Dave Lefcourt
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)

Even the American people in polls are overwhelmingly against a U.S. attack on Syria, they too remembering the charade given by Colin Powell at the U.N. in February, 2003 presenting "incontrovertible" evidence of Iraq's WMD, (which of course was proven to be a total fabrication).

Supposedly the Obama administration has "incontrovertible" evidence of Basher Assad being responsible for the gas attack last week.

However, no such "evidence" has been made public, just some allegations presented to a few Congressional leaders and even that was reportedly not the "smoking gun" leaving no doubt Assad authorized the attack.

So now we get "the president can act alone" in authorizing an attack on Syria. But it would be an illegal, reprehensible, un-Constitutional act of aggression and a crime against humanity against a country that has not attacked the U.S. or is an imminent threat to do so, (the ONLY legal basis to go to war).

If Obama does authorize a missile attack on Syria, this could be his "Waterloo" moment. With Democrats in the White House going all the way back to Lyndon Johnson and Viet Nam, the rationale for taking aggressive action has been fear of an attack by Republican right wingers. That continues with likes of Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham but now include the unhinged neo-conservative crazies pushing for regime change in Syria with Iran next on their agenda.

And let's not forget the Israeli government in this Syrian imbroglio. It is their "intelligence" on Assad's chemical weapons that the White House is purportedly trotting out as the basis for an attack on Syria. Throw in Israel's obsession with Iran developing a nuclear capability (and Syria being its primary ally along with Russia) and voila a new unnecessary war is on the near horizon with "unforeseeable consequences" sure to result.

From here it's reminiscent of the alliances of antagonists in 1914 before the onset of W.W. I. Think that probability is too much of a stretch; think again.    

 

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Dave Lefcourt Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Retired. The author of "DECEIT AND EXCESS IN AMERICA, HOW THE MONEYED INTERESTS HAVE STOLEN AMERICA AND HOW WE CAN GET IT BACK", Authorhouse, 2009
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend