39 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 38 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 1/16/21

Expanding Space Arms Control

By       (Page 2 of 2 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.   1 comment
Message Jason Sibert

Countries and special interest groups often oppose space arms control because space weapons are not easily verifiable. It is often hard to determine if a satellite is a weapon because there are many ways that a satellite can be used as a weapon. However, it easy to verify many types of actions in space such as a close approach or a collusion that creates a lot of debris. In addition, it is difficult to use a satellite to harm another satellite and militaries are more likely to use custom designed weapons than to try and modify a satellite.

Space situational awareness data has been a priority for our county and many other countries. This allowed us to prove that Russia tested a weapon in the summer of 2020. The issue of equality always comes up in all arms control treaties, as all sides must benefit in some way. The U.S. has integrated space enhancement capabilities into its national security infrastructure more than Russia and China. Russia has concentrated on counterspace capabilities, particularly electronic warfare. China is developing integrated counterspace and integrated space enhancement capabilities. Restricting ASAT capabilities would impact China and Russia more than the U.S., destroying the equitability factor. Limits or deployments on space-based weapons could meet the equality test, as stated by Samson and Weeken.

Our country must build a bond with our adversaries - China and Russia - on what constitutes acceptable behavior in space, something like the discussions that led to the Incidents at Sea Agreement during the Cold War. These discussions must include how the existing rules of armed combat apply to space. We should also lead on a ban of debris creating ASAT tests. All agreements must start out as trilateral (U.S., Russia, and China) agreements and expand to other nation-states and city-states.

If the world works together, we can focus on space as the final frontier and not the next theater for war.

Jason Sibert is Executive Director of the Peace Economy Project.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Jason Sibert Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Jason Sibert worked for the Suburban Journals in the St. Louis area as a staff writer for a decade. His work has been published in a variety of publications since then and he is currently the executive director of the Peace Economy Project.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Starting a New Discussion

Arms Control and New START

Escape from Authoritarianism

On Geoeconomics, International Law, and Peace

Negotiations in the Ukraine War

Our Government, Democracy and World Order

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend