As such, Clinton can NEVER be a
part of the solution to our critically pressing problems as a nation. Her
election over Trump would merely push a large part of the electorate towards open
revolt against her bankster-led "government." A mass uprising against her corporate-owned,
poverty-creating "government" is more probable than not. Civil War is an
entirely realistic possibility if she were to become President, and the economy were to crunch, leading to the bail in provisions of Dodd-Frank being implemented.
If Clinton somehow becomes the nominee, she will still be rejected. Disaffected millions from the right and the left will then unite behind Jesse Ventura's Independent Presidential run. However, this campaign would necessarily focus mainly on breaking elite control of the government, and terminating BOTH the Democratic and Republican Parties for their betrayal of America to elite criminals.
Sanders is leading a "Political Revolution." This is a struggle to break the control of immoral elites over our government and our economy. It is a struggle to restore government to its rightful owners, the American people.
So, no, Bill Maher, the differences between Clinton and Sanders are not "slight," they are as distinct as night and day, good and evil, life and death.
Therefore, it is NECESSARY that it be telegraphed in advance, that we will NOT EVER, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES VOTE FOR CLINTON. NEVER!
Sanders is the ONLY true choice for change among the present candidates!
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
4
3
2
