Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 3 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 9/23/14

100 Zephyrs: Why The Left Must Challenge Corporate Democrats

By       (Page 2 of 3 pages) Become a premium member to see this article and all articles as one long page.     (# of views)   9 comments
Author 77715
Message Richard Eskow
Become a Fan
  (14 fans)
- Advertisement -

Remembering Lincoln

Scher mentions Sen. Blanche Lincoln, who lost a general election after being challenged unsuccessfully in the primary. But there is no compelling evidence that Lincoln lost because she was primaried -- and none at all to indicate that she lost because she adopted more progressive positions.

We do know that Sen. Lincoln pushed forcefully for an amendment to the Dodd/Frank financial reform bill. The "Lincoln Amendment" prevents financial institutions from accessing favorable Federal Reserve credit if they conduct credit swaps. While it's not perfect, this amendment made the bill stronger -- and there are many who attribute Lincoln's change of heart to a primary challenge from the left.

Score one for primaries.

- Advertisement -

When The Going Gets Nasty, The Nasty Get Going

Scher also argues that Democrats "have suffered the consequences of failed primary challenges themselves," pointing to the 2006 attempt to defeat Joe Lieberman. It's true that Lieberman lost the Democratic primary before ultimately winning the general election that year -- but a battalion of senior party heavyweights, including Bill Clinton, stepped in on his behalf.

Lieberman's was an exceptional case. The election was largely driven by the surprising weakness of his Democratic challenger, while any vindictive after-effects can be attributed his own singularly unappealing personality.

- Advertisement -

Besides, do we really know that Lieberman wouldn't have become precisely the irritant he became had he gone unchallenged in the primary? After all, his obstructionist impact on Obama's most important first-term legislation was indistinguishable from that of other Blue Dog Democrats.

There is a compelling case to be made, in fact, for arguing that the left should have challenged more of Lieberman's "centrist" colleagues. Such challenges might have made the two key pieces of legislation from Obama's first term -- the Affordable Care Act and Dodd/Frank -- more progressive than they ultimately became.

Zephyr Wins

Then there is the example of Zephyr Teachout herself. Scher describes her primary challenge to Cuomo as "a losing campaign," but that misses the big picture. Cuomo treated the left with lordly contempt during his last term, a stance that rendered him indistinguishable from most of his fellow corporatist Democrats. (Remember when White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel called progressives "f**kin' retards" -- and President Obama never chided him for it?)

Cuomo's attitude changed when progressives became a serious threat to his plans. Teachout's candidacy, together with the threat of losing the Working Families Party line on the ballot, forced Cuomo to make significant commitments to the left. New York's ballot rules are unusual, but Cuomo's concession can be taken as another policy victory for progressive challengers.

Of course, it remains to be seen whether Cuomo will honor those commitments. But if he welshes on a public pledge, it certainly can't be argued that a softer approach would've been more successful.

- Advertisement -

Familiarity breeds contempt, as Emanuel's insult demonstrated. One of the lessons from the Cuomo challengers is this: Pushback can generate more respectful attention for the left.

Run, lefties, run

Scher is at his most persuasive when he is arguing that, despite their own occasionally fatalistic perceptions, progressives "already possess a significant amount of influence within the Democratic Party." He's right about that, and progressives would do well to remember that more often. But, contra Scher, the differences within the Democratic Party can be quite acrimonious at times.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   News 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Richard Eskow Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Host of 'The Breakdown,' Writer, and Senior Fellow, Campaign for America's Future

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How to Fix the Fed: Dismiss Dimon, Boot the Bankers, and Can the Corporations

The Top 12 Political Fallacies of 2012

Pawn: The Real George Zimmerman Story

What America Would Look Like If Libertarians Got Their Way

"His Own Man's" Man: Jeb Bush and the Return of Wolfowitz

"F" The Bureaucracy! The White House Can Help Homeowners Right Now