OpEdNews Op Eds

Move-On, Move Over, Mikes Moving In

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Become a Fan
  (65 fans)

I received an e-mail from Move-On that absolutely floored me. The reason that I mention it is because the substance of the communication was so presumptuous as to be insulting to me personally. The e-mail masqueraded as a “ballot” that would have me vote for Senator Obama or Senator Clinton, and the “winner” would then be the nominee that Move-On would then “endorse”.

It is presumptuous first of all because Move-On is supposedly an “issue driven political action group”. When I signed up to get their e-mail alerts, I was under the impression that they were not a political party and that they would not oppose or endorse any political candidates. I must have misunderstood. The timing of this so called “ballot” couldn’t be more fortuitous for the two Democrats that they are proposing to “endorse”. It is only one day after John Edwards ended his campaign, or in his own words “suspended” it. Is this a coincidence? I doubt it; there are no coincidences in politics. This was a cold and calculated move on the part of Move-On.

There is another element of this strategy that does not sit well with me. We have heard from Move-On for quite some time about the role that corporations play in American politics. The fact is that corporate donations to politicians that support multi-national industries; the same ones that are out-sourcing jobs to nations with cheap labor and thereby breaking the backs of the Unions, are part and parcel of what is helping to destroy the economic structure of our country. Move-On has been part of the movement to stop corporate controlled politicians from sending American jobs overseas. Taken directly from the Move-On website, this sentence describes what Move-On stands for; “But in contrast to most PACs, which funnel industry contributions to candidates in exchange for access, MoveOn.org Political Action brings hundreds of thousands of small donors together to elect candidates who will represent the American people”.

Is this what Move-On is doing now? A few days ago, one of the most outspoken critics of corporate lobbyists and corporations, John Edwards left the race. Why did Move-On, one day later distribute this “ballot” to its members? How can they justify supporting the two candidates that receive more corporate donations than any Republican candidate? They might have pulled this stunt off without anyone discovering the truth, but they forgot that there is a catch to their so-called “progressive” agenda; the still active participation of Senator Mike Gravel. It is unthinkable to ask Progressives to support either Hillary Clinton (the benefactor of the largest corporate donations) or Barack Obama who is 2nd only to Clinton in the following areas;

Commercial Banks

Health Professions including HMO’s and Nursing Homes,

Pharmaceutical Industry

Obama Comes in at;

5th-Insurance Industry (Clinton 4th)

7th Oil and Gas Industries (Clinton 3rd)

3rd Securities and Investments (Clinton 1st)

3rd Hedge Fund Industry (Clinton 1st)

4th Real Estate (Clinton 1st)

Let me ask this question to all of the Progressives that may be reading this; Is this the kind of candidate that will bring change to the Middle Class? I would like to know what kind of change it is that Move-On expects these two candidates to bring to us? Is this the kind of alliance that gives credence to the old maxim that “Politics makes for strange bedfellows?” In my opinion, Move-On has made a fatal error. If this were a computer problem, we would all be looking at “the blue screen of death”. If I was back in the Army and we were in a war-zone, I would be calling for artillery strikes around our position and be trying to raise every helicopter in the area for a “dust-off” to get us the hell out of there.

What exactly is happening here? Have we already determined that we are going to become a corporacracy? Have the American people become so politically naïve that we are going to willingly deliver this nation and all the promise that it once held to multi-national corporations without a fight? Is this what Eisenhower was talking about when he warned us about the “Military Industrial Complex?” In fact, this is the same thing that Senator Mike Gravel told us about in the very first Democratic debate that everyone laughed at. It isn’t as funny now that Move-On, the largest coalition of so-called Progressives asks us to choose which corporate-controlled candidate we would rather have them support!

I am reminded of what Dorothy said to Todo when she woke up after the tornado. “We’re not in Kansas anymore” she said. Well I believe that we are not in, or anywhere near Progressive America either, no matter what Move-On would have you believe.

Next Page  1  |  2



Former Chairman of the Liberal Party of America, Tim is a retired Army Sergeant. He currently lives in South Carolina. A regular contributor to OpEdNews, he is the author of Kimchee Days (or Stoned Cold Warriors).

Tim's political book, (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

S 1867: Killing The Bill of Rights and Declaring War on Americans

Arranging the Deck Chairs While Death Comes from Japan

The Fix is In. The Revolution is Coming.

Interview with Finian Cunningham: Bahrain and the U.S. Role

America Does not have a Functioning Democracy - President Jimmy Carter-- Yet MSM Keeps Serving Up Distractions

Prime-time Politics for the Masses


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I, too, was outraged by the MoveOn poll. Given the... by welshTerrier2 on Thursday, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:40:50 PM