Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   4 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

On Being Fodder for Offenders

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 10/10/12

Become a Fan
  (24 fans)
- Advertisement -

(Article changed on October 11, 2012 at 15:31)

Language changes like a river, and now we have another new ripple.  Except it isn't new.  I'm referring to using a noun to modify another noun -- when the modifying noun is Democrat.  I'm sure you've seen or heard it, as in: 

The Democrat party, or

A Democrat senator


The first time I registered this grammatical abomination was in a remark by George W. Bush during his presidency (so I simply ascribed it to ignorance), but a bit of digging reveals that the epithet has been in use since at least the 1940s in Wendell Wilkie's failed presidential campaign.  

These days, use of the slur appears to be rampant.    Right-wing talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh uses the term promiscuously.  Many conservative Republicans, including House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, Speaker of the House John Boehner, and a host of Congressional Republicans, use the term liberally (no pun intended).  More tellingly, the noun-as-adjective has occurred in most GOP platforms since 1948. 

In fact placing a noun in front of an adjective is not always wrong.  We do it routinely to form compound nouns such as "copy machine", "food activist", and "peace (or bowel) movement". 

- Advertisement -

But the political entity I'm talking about is named the Democratic Party and to remove the suffix is not only to misuse, but also deliberately to disparage, the party and hence its constituents.  As House Representative Marty Kaptur reprimanded Representative Jeb Hensarling after he, in questioning Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag, repeatedly used the epithet:

I'd like to begin by saying to my colleague from Texas that there isn't a single member on this side of the aisle that belongs to the "Democrat Party'.  We belong to the Democratic Party.  So the party you were referring to doesn't even exist.  And I would just appreciate the courtesy when you're referring to our party, if you're referring to the Democratic Party, to refer to it as such.  


Two kinds of people misuse the noun-as-adjective Democrat, and the first of these knows exactly what he's doing.  Such a person is signaling derision with a sly and underhanded slur.  Paul Craig Roberts, in his highly ambivalent association with the idol (including Reagan) questioners of this site, uses it ("Why didn't the Democrat convention raise the issue ..."). 

The other kind of person who uses this term, and unfortunately I've seen it used in comments on this site, is simply untutored, not sufficiently versed in the use of proper speech to detect the error but enough of a follower to replicate its use.  That person means no offense.  He or she is simply regurgitating, unexamined, what he or she has seen and heard. 

Such people are thus, much to the delight of intentional offenders, unwittingly enrolling in and enlivening the strategy. 

- Advertisement -

If you're going to act as fodder for the right, at least be aware of it.

Dr. Dial is a psychologist and medical illustrator who for well over a decade has worked as a freelance medical and science writer and editor. She is an editor for OpEdNews, having contributed a number of articles about hydraulic fracturing, (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Seeds of destruction: It's NOT just about food

Who Turned Scientific American?

Who the Frack's Really in Charge?

Fracking: Water Issues--Colorado-centric, but applicable to all

Why Barack Obama Does Not Disappoint Some Folks

Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Fracking but Should Be Afraid to Ask


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Democratic party of Obushma lies eternal, and some... by Don Caldarazzo on Thursday, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:26:15 PM
is addressed to anyone who uses language.  I ... by j dial on Thursday, Oct 11, 2012 at 4:31:50 PM
Sometimes I get a little too carried away with my ... by Don Caldarazzo on Thursday, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:24:31 PM
You really need to be careful much more often.... by BFalcon on Friday, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:38:50 AM