Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 18 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 10/10/12

On Being Fodder for Offenders

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   4 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Follow Me on Twitter     Message j dial
Become a Fan
  (30 fans)

(Article changed on October 11, 2012 at 15:31)

(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

Language changes like a river, and now we have another new ripple.  Except it isn't new.  I'm referring to using a noun to modify another noun -- when the modifying noun is Democrat.  I'm sure you've seen or heard it, as in: 


The Democrat party, or

A Democrat senator


The first time I registered this grammatical abomination was in a remark by George W. Bush during his presidency (so I simply ascribed it to ignorance), but a bit of digging reveals that the epithet has been in use since at least the 1940s in Wendell Wilkie's failed presidential campaign.  


These days, use of the slur appears to be rampant.    Right-wing talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh uses the term promiscuously.  Many conservative Republicans, including House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, Speaker of the House John Boehner, and a host of Congressional Republicans, use the term liberally (no pun intended).  More tellingly, the noun-as-adjective has occurred in most GOP platforms since 1948. 


In fact placing a noun in front of an adjective is not always wrong.  We do it routinely to form compound nouns such as "copy machine", "food activist", and "peace (or bowel) movement". 


But the political entity I'm talking about is named the Democratic Party and to remove the suffix is not only to misuse, but also deliberately to disparage, the party and hence its constituents.  As House Representative Marty Kaptur reprimanded Representative Jeb Hensarling after he, in questioning Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag, repeatedly used the epithet:


Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Rate It | View Ratings

j dial Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Schooled in psychology and biomedical illustration, of course I became a medical writer!

In 2014 my husband and I and our kitty moved from Colorado, where Jerry had been born, to Canada, where I had been. (Born.)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Who Turned Scientific American?

Seeds of destruction: It's NOT just about food

Who the Frack's Really in Charge?

Fracking: Water Issues--Colorado-centric, but applicable to all

Why Barack Obama Does Not Disappoint Some Folks

Where Have all the Finches Gone?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: