Tags for This Article:

Obama-Barack (1731)  Voting (1303)  Clinton-Hillary (1078)  Barack Obama (942)  Senate (741)  Poverty (553)  Presidential Campaign (499)  Race (430)  Presidential Campaign Democratic (403)  Clinton Bill (346)  Presidential Campaign Democratic (295)  Edwards John (279)  Presidential Primary Elections (264)  President Campaign (86)  Diversity (23) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
February 2, 2008 at 12:15:12

Obama Endorsement – I, a former Edwards supporter, endorse Barack Obama for President

by Steven Leser     Page 1 of 2 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

We Democrats are getting close to having a nominee for President. I made no secret of my vigorous support for John Edwards’ candidacy. I wrote several articles in the past attacking his rivals for the nomination, including Obama. In the last few weeks, I’ve reached out to members of some of those rivals’ campaigns. I realized after Iowa that there was a chance Edwards would not win the nomination and if he dropped out, I wanted to be well informed about both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama so I would know who I wanted to support in a post-Edwards race.

 

In an intellectual exercise, I cleared my mind of all past knowledge of what I knew about either Hillary or Obama and I researched their accomplishments, their speeches and tried to find out who they were as people. It’s a challenging thing to try to start from scratch about things or people you know so much about.  I imagine that renowned Zoologist Desmond Morris, who wrote “The Naked Ape” had similar difficulties ignoring what he knew about human beings and writing about them from the perspective of a Zoologist cataloguing and examining a never before seen species.

 

A few things stand out about Barack Obama. First, his whole life has been about diversity. Born to a Kenyan father and a white American mother, he looks like the picture of diversity. His mother and father divorced when he was two and then Barack later had an Indonesian stepfather with whom he and his mother moved to Indonesia. Wikipedia’s entry on Obama quotes him at an appearance on the Oprah Winfrey show when he said

"Michelle will tell you that when we get together for Christmas or Thanksgiving, it's like a little mini-United Nations… I've got relatives who look like Bernie Mac, and I've got relatives who look like Margaret Thatcher. We've got it all."

 

In an America where many Republicans seem determined to divide us on issues like race, religion and immigration status, Obama’s candidacy and Presidency would be like a miracle cure. That isn’t to say that I think that such issues would magically disappear overnight in an Obama Presidency, but he could speak to and deal with such issues from a perspective and with the authority that few others could and as a result would be a nearly irresistible force for positive change. Hillary Clinton not only cannot offer this, the way she has conducted her campaign over the last six weeks has been like putting salt in the wounds of America’s ethnic divisions.

 

Second, despite having a very progressive voting record, Obama has made a point of reaching out to and dialoguing with Republicans and the religious right. At the same time, he hasn’t shrunk from challenging Republican groups to be less divisive. According to Wikipedia:

 
In December 2006, he joined Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS) at the "Global Summit on AIDS and the Church" organized by church leaders Kay and Rick Warren. Together with Warren and Brownback, Obama took an HIV test, as he had done in Kenya less than four months earlier. He encouraged "others in public life to do the same" to show "there is no shame in going for an HIV test."… Addressing over 8,000 United Church of Christ members in June 2007, Obama challenged "so-called leaders of the Christian Right" for being "all too eager to exploit what divides us."
 

This example is just one of many times where Obama reached out to the right without sacrificing his principles. Again, Hillary Clinton does not have this capacity to reach out to Republicans and speak the truth to them and have it come across in positive way. Even if she suddenly developed the ability to do this overnight, it would no longer matter. She and her husband have such a reservoir of ill-will with the ideological right in this country that it would not matter how much and in what way she reached out, the country would remain starkly divided under a Hillary Clinton Presidency, if she somehow managed to get that far, which I doubt.

 

Third, an impressive aspect of Barack Obama has been his unwavering commitment to peace and diplomacy. As an Edwards supporter, I used to hate it when Obama supporters would remind me that he made the right choice on the Iraq war resolution. I hated it because you cannot deny that he had the foresight few others had at the time that the Bush administration viewed the passage of the resolution as a blank check to go to war. About this, Obama has said:

 

“But conventional thinking in Washington lined up for war. The pundits judged the political winds to be blowing in the direction of the President. Despite - or perhaps because of how much experience they had in Washington, too many politicians feared looking weak and failed to ask hard questions. Too many took the President at his word instead of reading the intelligence for themselves. Congress gave the President the authority to go to war. Our only opportunity to stop the war was lost.”

 

Some other highlights about Obama’s opposition to the war:

 

- In 2003 and 2004, he spoke out against the war on the campaign trail;

 

- In 2005, he called for a phased withdrawal of our troops;

 

- In 2006, he called for a timetable to remove our troops, a political solution within Iraq, and aggressive diplomacy with all of Iraq’s neighbors;

 

- In January 2007, he introduced legislation in the Senate to remove all of our combat troops from Iraq by March 2008.

 

- In September 2007, he laid out a detailed plan for how he will end the war as president.

 Hillary Clinton voted for the Iraq war and has a horrific record of voting to continue to support and fund it at nearly every opportunity. During the campaign, she has been the least decisive on ending the war and bringing home the troops making me doubt if she really intends to do either in the first years of her Presidency. 

Finally, Obama has a legislative record of fighting for middle and lower income families. He fought during his tenure in the Illinois State Senate to help working families get ahead by creating programs like the state Earned Income Tax Credit, which in three years provided over $100 million in tax cuts to families across the state. He also pushed through an expansion of early childhood education. From his website, here are some of Obama’s proposals on poverty and job creation:

 1  |  2

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
I support and endorse Barack Obama for President

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Steven Leser specializes in Politics, Science & Health, and Entertainment topics. He has held positions within the Democratic Party including District Chair and Public Relations Chair within county organizations. Steven Leser writes for www.opednews.com, an internet only media site that has grown to become one of the highest traffic news sites in America, reaching more traffic, according to alexa.com, than all but the thirty largest daily newspapers in the US. Mr. Leser is one of the 500+ liberal pundits who, each month, are published in what has become one of the top five Liberal/progressive media sites in the US.

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
10 comments

A concerned citizen, who votes.
wagonsA concerned citizen, who votes.

War votes

I am an Edwards supporter too, and I must object to your characterization about the war votes. Yes, Obama said in 2002 we shouldn't pursue the war, but when he got to the Senate he voted exactly the same way that Hillary did, right along the way. Edwards pleaded with his former colleagues to refuse to send a funding bill that had no timetable for withdrawal, and to send it back as many times as needed when Bush vetoes it. To keep sending it back. But Obama did not do that. So don't base your vote on his war stance. He speaks well and then does the practical, safe thing. I think he has potential, but I don't think he can win in November. He is a dreamer, a great speaker, but there is so little obvious substance. He will rely too heavily on advisors - and who exactly will they be?  Zbigniew Brzezinski?? This is new thinking??   ?Hillary has problems, for sure, but she has substance too. She knows her stuff. I would vote for Edwards in a hearbeat - and I might still in the primary - but if I don't I will vote for Clinton. She is in the best position to win, and that is all I care about this year.

by wagons (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 2 comments) on Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 7:45:41 PM
 


Steven Leser specializes in Politics, Science & Health, and Entertainment topics. He has held positions within the Democratic Party including District Chair and Public Relations Chair within county organizations.

Steven Leser writes for www.opednews.com, an internet only media site that has grown to become one of the highest traffic news sites in America, reaching more traffic, according to alexa.com, than all but the thirty largest daily newspapers in the US. Mr. Leser is one of t...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Steven LeserSteven Leser specializes in Politics, Science & Health, and Entertainment topics. He has held positions within the Democratic Party including District Chair and Public Relations Chair within county organizations.

Steven Leser writes for www.opednews.com, an internet only media site that has grown to become one of the highest traffic news sites in America, reaching more traffic, according to alexa.com, than all but the thirty largest daily newspapers in the US. Mr. Leser is one of t...

to see more of bio, click on member name

The best position to win? No way

There is no reasonable interpretation of available data that results in that conclusion.

1. She has by far the highest negative rating at this time of the race (the percentage of registered voters that view her negatively) of any potential candidate in history. The winner of the Presidency has ALWAYS been the candidate with the lower negative rating, not necessarily the higher positive rating. I've been writing about this since long before I had even decided to think about who to support in the race.

Sources:

Hillary's Ratings

Obama's Ratings

Romney's Ratings

McCain's Ratings

2. Obama and Edwards before him consistently poll better against Romney and McCain than Clinton does.

http://www.pollingreport.com/wh08gen.htm

by Steven Leser (193 articles, 37 quicklinks, 32 diaries, 1298 comments) on Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 9:11:22 PM
 


A concerned citizen, who votes.
wagonsA concerned citizen, who votes.

Polls??

Polls? You've got to be kidding. Someone called me the other day a few minutes before the last debate and asked me who I was supporting - I said Edwards. She said now that he's out who are you supporting? I said I haven't decided, except that I had.  So I go down as an "undecided".  I might just have easily said I'm supporting Obama or McCain or George Washington. No requirement to tell the truth, as New Hampshire showed us.

But you didn't answer the point I was making about the war - his argument is hollow based on his own voting record.

by wagons (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 2 comments) on Sunday, February 3, 2008 at 4:20:18 PM
 


Brett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.
Brett PaatschBrett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.

Obama is a Pollyanna force for regression who is fiddling

whilst America burns. 

 

Take a look at this standard reply letter to constituents asking about impeachment.  

Here are a couple of excerpts:

I support robust Congressional investigations into his administration and the highly questionable actions it has taken in areas such as domestic spying and the U.S. attorney firings.

The Democratic Congress has achieved important progress this year, but we are still stymied by a President who is out of sync with the American people,

3

America needs to move forward again, and I don't believe that continuing this era of bitter partisanship is the best course of action. As I travel the country campaigning, I hear the call for a new direction and a change in our politics, a thirst for something more. I don't believe impeachment answers this call.I believe if we begin impeachment proceedings we will be engulfed in more of the politics that has made Washington dysfunctional. We would once again, rather than attending to the people's business, be engaged in a tit-for-tat, back-and-forth, non-stop circus.

Obama is talking like a vision drunk impractical idiot.  He is of the same species of moron as Pelosi who wants to be united rather than divided with the very domestic threats they swore oaths to defend the Constitution against.

Now Steven you are smart enough for me to not need to pull any punches with. The truth is the truth. And the truth is Barack Obama could be doing something on impeachment, he could be showing himself to be a great man ready to take on the responsibility of being President and commander in chief, and he is not.  Obama is acting like a Pollyanna character that wants to pretend he is above it all and can get on with anyone and unite everyone when it is impossible to do that without betraying his oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.

Where you may ask is he clearly failing?

I answer he is clearly failing because he is not calling for the impeachment of Bush and Cheney over the FISA matter. The very same matter he refers to in point 1 above.

If the Democrats do not fall over again and grant immunity over FISA then the impeachment of Cheney or Bush and perhaps both is a slam dunk based on what Cheney and Bush have said (according to Steve Olbermann). 

On his video which is currently linked from a story headlined from this Opednews site Steve Olbermann states Cheney has admitted that "telecommunications companies have worked with us and helped prevent further attacks against the United States". And Bush has said only that they are beLIEved to have assisted. Because Bush can't say either that they have assisted - before they get immunity, nor can he say that they not. This is because Bush is threatening to veto a FISA change that doesn't contain immunity DESPITE that he says doing so would risk American lives. Olbermann has clearly identified a situation where Bush is over a barrel of his own making and all that is necessary is for the Democrats to recognize it.

This is the opportunity that the Democrats have been waiting for. They can wedge Bush and Cheney with the FISA matter.

Now is the time for Barack Obama to stand up for the Constitution or to sit down and shut up because he is not ready to be president.  He is not ready to defend the constitution. He is not ready for promotion to higher office when he is not keeping his oath in the lower office.

 

by Brett Paatsch (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 21 diaries, 961 comments) on Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 9:12:03 PM
 


Steven Leser specializes in Politics, Science & Health, and Entertainment topics. He has held positions within the Democratic Party including District Chair and Public Relations Chair within county organizations.

Steven Leser writes for www.opednews.com, an internet only media site that has grown to become one of the highest traffic news sites in America, reaching more traffic, according to alexa.com, than all but the thirty largest daily newspapers in the US. Mr. Leser is one of t...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Steven LeserSteven Leser specializes in Politics, Science & Health, and Entertainment topics. He has held positions within the Democratic Party including District Chair and Public Relations Chair within county organizations.

Steven Leser writes for www.opednews.com, an internet only media site that has grown to become one of the highest traffic news sites in America, reaching more traffic, according to alexa.com, than all but the thirty largest daily newspapers in the US. Mr. Leser is one of t...

to see more of bio, click on member name

He is not regressive at all...

... I have no expectation of Presidential candidates to be calling for impeachment. I didnt expect it of Edwards, so why should I now call on Obama to do so? I dont believe it is the responsibility of a Presidential candidate to do that. Now, leaders in the senate and house? That is another matter.

And you complain about a standard form letter, have you sent an email to any candidate for President and received anything less? I have, once, out of dozens that I have sent over the past 12 years or so.

by Steven Leser (193 articles, 37 quicklinks, 32 diaries, 1298 comments) on Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 9:21:56 PM
 


Brett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.
Brett PaatschBrett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.

He IS regressive BECAUSE he is Participating in a diversion

whilst he is STILL a Senator and STILL has a CURRENT responsibility to protect the US Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic.

And you are regressive if you help him pull that switch and help him sell himself into his next promotion whilst failing to do his current job.

Barack could champion impeachment better than he has which is to say better than b*gger all. And you as a citizen and an activist could ask him to. And now is a good time because now there is an opportunity to hang Bush with the same impeachment process that was used with Nixon on virtually the same Constitutional issue - spying on Americans.

Obama is responsible for his form letters. He is responsible for what is done in his name. He is responsible for his oaths and affirmations. And he is not doing his duty to defend the Constitution against a domestic enemy that wants to break the FISA laws and give immunity to corporations that violated the rights of Americans. So Obama is a regressive.

I don't care if Obama is less bad than Hillary anymore than I care if Gobbels is less bad than Hitler - that pick the less bad option is not the standard with which to maintain the rule of law and the Constitution.

I don't mean to be offensive but I do mean to throw cold water on you Steve. If you switch to supporting Obama because he is the least bad option when he is still not doing his constitutional duty and still not upholding his oath then you Steve are not doing your duty as a citizen and you Steve are being a regressive by diverting attention. And so is Rob. If the effect of what you do is regressive then you are being a regressive. And the EFFECT of supporting Obama for a promotion rather than criticising Obama for failing to do his duty is regressive. You are endorsing his abrogation and assisting it.

If Obama is elected President with America in its current state of denial and with Bush not impeached Obama will not be able to do the job. He will not have the tools he needs. If on the other hand he supports impeachment as he should as a Senator who has taken an oath, then, he may be part of the solution to the current problem and may deserve to be President. He may make part of the change that he will need to be President now. If he doesn't he won't have the tools he needs in office (confidence in the rule of law) and he won't deserve the office.

by Brett Paatsch (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 21 diaries, 961 comments) on Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 11:17:43 PM
 


Steven Leser specializes in Politics, Science & Health, and Entertainment topics. He has held positions within the Democratic Party including District Chair and Public Relations Chair within county organizations.

Steven Leser writes for www.opednews.com, an internet only media site that has grown to become one of the highest traffic news sites in America, reaching more traffic, according to alexa.com, than all but the thirty largest daily newspapers in the US. Mr. Leser is one of t...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Steven LeserSteven Leser specializes in Politics, Science & Health, and Entertainment topics. He has held positions within the Democratic Party including District Chair and Public Relations Chair within county organizations.

Steven Leser writes for www.opednews.com, an internet only media site that has grown to become one of the highest traffic news sites in America, reaching more traffic, according to alexa.com, than all but the thirty largest daily newspapers in the US. Mr. Leser is one of t...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Sorry, I find one-issue people tiresome.

Nor does what you are talking about have anything to do with being regressive or progressive. Want proof? If Hitler were alive today, would he be progressive and not regressive if he supported impeachment and yet had all of his other 'viewpoints' intact?

You can do this with all one issue people and viewpoints.  If any of the current crop of GOP candidates decided to support impeachment, that would not make them a progressive. Sorry. Likewise, if a Democratic candidate was progressive in all other ways and did not support impeachment, that does not make them regressive.

by Steven Leser (193 articles, 37 quicklinks, 32 diaries, 1298 comments) on Sunday, February 3, 2008 at 4:00:30 AM
 


Brett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.
Brett PaatschBrett Paatsch is an Australian born secular humanist with degrees in management and science and an interest in politics. He is a former pro-American that wishes to be pro-American again and thinks the impeachment and repudiation of President George W Bush for the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 is necessary to reestablish trust in American signatures on international treaties and confidence in the global rule of law.

Sometimes there really is a single most important issue

Want proof? If Hitler were alive today, would he be progressive and not regressive if he supported impeachment and yet had all of his other 'viewpoints' intact?

No, if Hitler were alive today with all of the same viewpoints he had in life intact he would only support impeachment for his own political purposes not because he had sworn a solemn oath to the people that elected him to defend the Constitution.  Your proof isn't relevant.

Barack took an oath and took on a duty to defend the Constitution including from domestic enemies when he took that oath and he is not doing it.  

I understand that single issue people are tiresome (especially when they nag at our consciences) but sometimes (rarely perhaps but this is one of those times) one issue is so much more important to so many people around the world that it really is the absolute top of the hierarchy. Now impeachment is that issue because without it there is no United States of America as a viable contract between citizens and there is no rule of law. And torture and aggressive invasions will be on the table for humans in the future because Pelosi and the Democrats including Obama and Clinton have, in breach of their oaths, kept impeachment off of it.

Torture and aggressive invasions have come back onto the table on your watch Steven. And mine. And Obamas.   We are responsible for what happens on our watch.  I have a German name. I will not be a good German. 

by Brett Paatsch (0 articles, 2 quicklinks, 21 diaries, 961 comments) on Sunday, February 3, 2008 at 7:06:07 AM
 


x
Tony Forestx

...

sleep well!

by Tony Forest (4 articles, 14 quicklinks, 131 diaries, 1216 comments) on Sunday, February 3, 2008 at 3:00:23 PM
 

 

10 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Sarah Palin, A Wolf in Moose Clothing by Anthony Wade

Sarah Palin: Small Mind In A Big Little Town by Judy Swindler

Republicans Are Mean by Mary Lyon

IS SARAH PALIN SATAN? by Sherman Yellen

Why Trig Palin's parentage is a national security matter. by John Toradze

Falujah Veteran is Attacked by McCain Republicans at Speech by Dean Powers

Who Is Wrecking America? by Paul Craig Roberts

FBI/police ordered to curtail protests: Explains Amy Goodman's arrest? by Kathryn Smith

Note to Sarah Palin: This track mom is going with Obama/Biden by Mary MacElveen

McCain's heroic story isn't the whole story; questions need asking by Don Williams

Popularity Navigation
Control Panel:

Select Time
6 hrs 12 hrs
1 Day 2 Days
3 Days 1 Week
2 Weeks 1 Month
2 Months 3 Months
6 Months Last Year
Select Content
Articles Diaries
Polls Events
All Op-Eds
News Life/Arts/Science
Select Popularity
Page Views
# of Comments
Recommend Emails
  

Go To Top 50 Most Popular