Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;  (less...)
Add to My Group
November 20, 2007 at 19:16:45

View Ratings | Rate It

McClelland Confirms Bush et al Conspired to Leak and Cover-up the Leak of Plame's Identity. Impeachment should Follow

FACEBOOK
submit to twitter
submit to reddit
submit to digg

Tell A Friend

By Steven Leser (about the author)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com     Permalink

For OpEdNews: Steven Leser - Writer

Speaker Pelosi and Senator Reid need to put impeachment back on the table now. In fact, forget the table; it needs to be put forth in articles on the House floor right now. Former White House Press Secretary Scott McClelland has revealed through his upcoming book that Bush, Cheney, Rove, Scooter Libby and former White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card, conspired to leak Valerie Plame’s identity and status as a covert CIA agent to the press and then further conspired to cover up that leak. All this was punishment for her husband’s article in the New York Times exposing the lie of the Bush administration’s Iraq war justifications.

Through it all, President Bush, Vice President Cheney and the other top White House personnel lied to the public about it. In a famous press conference, Bush said that he would fire anyone involved in the leak. Congress now needs to help him do it. According to this article in the Associated Press:

In an excerpt from his forthcoming book, McClellan recounts the 2003 news conference in which he told reporters that aides Karl Rove and I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby were "not involved" in the leak involving operative Valerie Plame.

"There was one problem. It was not true," McClellan writes, according to a brief excerpt released Tuesday. "I had unknowingly passed along false information. And five of the highest-ranking officials in the administration were involved in my doing so: Rove, Libby, the vice president, the president's chief of staff and the president himself."

-------------------------------------------

I wrote in July in this article, that the commutation of Libby by Bush demanded impeachment because it signaled to me that Bush was involved and needed to prevent Libby from breaking and implicating others in the White House in order to save his skin. I urge everyone reading this to go back to my previous article and read it in its entirety. I said at the time:

When Richard Nixon fired Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox as part of the October 23, 1973 “Saturday Night Massacre”, he did it to prevent information being released that could directly implicate him in wrongdoing. Cox had issued Nixon a subpoena requesting the now infamous Nixon tapes and Nixon acted to protect himself and in doing so obstructed justice in the ongoing Watergate investigations. This is not entirely different from what we have with Bush and his commutation of Libby’s sentence. Patrick Fitzgerald filed obstruction of justice charges against Libby because he believed that Libby had information relevant to the investigation and lied or refused to divulge that information. A jury agreed, found him guilty and Libby received 30 months in prison. One of the things prosecutors hope happens in situations like this is when the person obstructing justice is faced with a lengthy prison term, in exchange for avoiding prison they start providing the information they were withholding. Bush’s commutation takes the threat of prison away from Libby and is thus an act of obstruction of justice. Nixon’s actions in the Saturday Night Massacre led directly to several articles of impeachment being filed against him in congress in the ensuing days. A President cannot be allowed to take such a brazen act to impede an investigation in which he is one of the potential suspects. Congress should ALWAYS respond to acts like these with impeachment hearings otherwise Presidents will feel that they can live above the law and avoid the consequences....Now, Bush has purchased Libby’s everlasting silence on a matter that could very well have implicated Bush himself or other members of his administration in a crime. For that, and for many other things before it, both Bush and Cheney should be investigated, impeached and removed from office.

-------------------------------------------------

I knew all this, but I had no idea at the time that someone so close to the inner circle in the White House would come out four months later and reveal how correct I had been.

What McClelland has confirmed is that Bush, Cheney and other erstwhile senior members of the White House are guilty of crimes far greater than those of Watergate. Patrick Fitzgerald needs to gear up his team and House Democratic leaders in congress MUST IMMEDIATELY begin impeachment hearings.

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Demand the Impeachment of Bush and Cheney

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

OEN editor Steve Leser is a hot national political pundit. He has appeared on MSNBC's Coundown with Keith Olbermann and Comedy Central's Daily Show with Jon Stewart. But, Leser is most known for his work as commentator and the progressive (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Book Recommendations for "Bush Admin"
Bush admin. farm bill plan: so is it really the reform they talked about?: An article from: Pro Farmer
by Gale Reference Team

$9.95

Number of pages: 4
Publisher: Thomson Gale

Bush admin. delays E-Verify, women's Set-Aside.: An article from: Set-Aside Alert
by Gale Reference Team

$9.95

Number of pages: 2
Publisher: Business Research Services, Inc.

Transforming Mental Health Care in America (Federal Action Agenda: 1st Steps)

$4.89

Number of pages: 83
Publisher: Mental Health Services Admin., DHHS

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
31 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
 

Interesting by Brett Paatsch on Tuesday, Nov 20, 2007 at 9:02:50 PM
My dream by Charlie L on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:28:34 AM
Nothing would be finer ... by Mr M on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 11:00:52 AM
covert CIA agent by steve scheetz on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:13:12 PM
She was covert and the current head of the CIA confirmed it by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 6:28:55 PM
Re: "McClelland Confirms Bush et al Conspired to Leak by Munich on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 7:38:35 PM
Yeah, I agree. What's more, if Pelosi & Reid do NOT move for by Richard Mynick on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:25:34 PM
Its a goodf dream by Sleeper on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 4:37:52 PM
Here is my problem with that.. by steve scheetz on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 9:29:46 PM
Your attempts to spin this away do you no credit. Really. by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:25:04 PM
The one thing you are right about is that... by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:30:26 PM
on another note.. by steve scheetz on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 9:33:06 PM
And if you really want me to beat a dead horse, Steve... by Steven Leser on Wednesday, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:38:12 PM
One wonders why he comes up with this claim now? by Andris on Thursday, Nov 22, 2007 at 2:12:07 AM
You are confusing regular court with impeachment hearings by Steven Leser on Thursday, Nov 22, 2007 at 8:20:25 AM
thank you for that ....I'm shocked by Andris on Thursday, Nov 22, 2007 at 3:28:44 PM
That is exactly what the Supreme Court said during the by Steven Leser on Thursday, Nov 22, 2007 at 4:43:16 PM
McClelland Confirms Bush et al Conspired to Leak and Cover-u by Eddy Schmid on Thursday, Nov 22, 2007 at 3:50:18 AM
Well, in my "alternate unverse" fighting for the right thing by Steven Leser on Thursday, Nov 22, 2007 at 8:26:53 AM
Fight the Good Fightt by Sleeper on Thursday, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:03:07 AM
Right thing? by Andris on Thursday, Nov 22, 2007 at 3:37:55 PM
Mob rule is a subjective statement isnt it? by Steven Leser on Thursday, Nov 22, 2007 at 5:04:39 PM
And isnt the Rule of law what a Constitution says it is? by Steven Leser on Thursday, Nov 22, 2007 at 5:11:27 PM
It is a court action , court rules apply by Andris on Thursday, Nov 22, 2007 at 4:36:13 PM
Normally regarding legal issues, I would not presume to... by Steven Leser on Thursday, Nov 22, 2007 at 4:44:53 PM
You can also see what Clinton's folks submitted during... by Steven Leser on Thursday, Nov 22, 2007 at 5:10:29 PM
A few more links for you by Steven Leser on Thursday, Nov 22, 2007 at 5:36:23 PM
I am "SPINNING??" by steve scheetz on Thursday, Nov 22, 2007 at 6:17:28 PM
There are no inconsistencies if you read thoroughly by Steven Leser on Friday, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:26:26 AM
Presidential LIES by Sleeper on Friday, Nov 23, 2007 at 2:51:38 PM
More about Impeachment by Sleeper on Monday, Nov 26, 2007 at 7:30:22 AM

 

 

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2010, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum