Home
Refresh   Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
July 4, 2007 at 04:57:29

View Ratings | Rate It

Bush Impeachment – Libby Commutation Makes it Imperative

by Steven Leser     Page 1 of 6 page(s)

www.opednews.com


Tell A Friend

When Richard Nixon fired Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox as part of the October 23, 1973 “Saturday Night Massacre”, he did it to prevent information being released that could directly implicate him in wrongdoing. Cox had issued Nixon a subpoena requesting the now infamous Nixon tapes and Nixon acted to protect himself and in doing so obstructed justice in the ongoing Watergate investigations. This is not entirely different from what we have with Bush and his commutation of Libby’s sentence. Patrick Fitzgerald filed obstruction of justice charges against Libby because he believed that Libby had information relevant to the investigation and lied or refused to divulge that information. A jury agreed, found him guilty and Libby received 30 months in prison. One of the things prosecutors hope happens in situations like this is when the person obstructing justice is faced with a lengthy prison term, in exchange for avoiding prison they start providing the information they were withholding. Bush’s commutation takes the threat of prison away from Libby and is thus an act of obstruction of justice.

 

Nixon’s actions in the Saturday Night Massacre lead directly to several articles of impeachment being filed against him in congress in the ensuing days. A President cannot be allowed to take such a brazen act to impede an investigation in which he is one of the potential suspects. Congress should ALWAYS respond to acts like these with impeachment hearings otherwise Presidents will feel like they can live above the law and take action to prevent any consequences.

 

I wonder if the public realize another important aspect of this. The commutation is a virtual admission of guilt by Bush that the outing of Plame was part of a generalized conspiracy in the White House that involved major players, i.e. either Bush or Cheney themselves. There is no other reason the President would intervene. It was not a matter of, as Bush tried to suggest, “the prison sentence given to Mr. Libby is excessive”. As of the morning of July 2, a few hours before Bush would commute the sentence, Libby had six to eight weeks before he had to report to prison and concurrently as of July 2, the appeals process would take a few months. If Libby was innocent and the administration had nothing to hide and Libby nothing to tell prosecutors, Libby would do a month or two in prison before the appeals process got into full swing and then he would have a strong shot at being set free. Bush’s commutation of Libby’s sentence shows that none of this was true and that Libby was close to breaking and telling Fitzgerald everything he knew.

 

Fred Thompson and other prominent Republicans eye-deep in the cover-up

 

As I write this, I note another article with similar themes by the esteemed Amy Goodman who directs us to another important point. Bush claimed in his statement about the commutation that Libby still faces a stiff fine and probation. You can kiss the fine goodbye. There is a fund to pay the fine that has been raised by many prominent Republicans including Fred Thompson. Thompson and other Republicans know what kind of a mess it would be for their party if the real facts regarding Plamegate came out so they are paying Libby’s fine for him. Now Libby has no repercussions and nothing to fear at all, the jail sentence is gone, the fine has been paid, and next I am sure will come a cushy job courtesy of the Republican good old boy network.

 

Bush’s commutation of Libby’s sentence is a knowing and intentional act of obstruction of justice designed to hide another obstruction of justice regarding an investigation of a serious criminal act by the White House that involved lying the country into war in Iraq. I realize that is confusing, so let’s lay it out in bullet points:

 1. President Bush and Vice President Cheney decide to go to war and remove Saddam from Iraq even before 9/11.

Bush and Cheney are convinced by their cronies (people like Paul Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld) in the conservative think tank Project for the New American Century who had been petitioning various Democrats and Republicans to remove Saddam since as early as 1996. The problem they was how to sell the war to the American People.

 2. 9/11 happens. The administration takes advantage to advance their Iraq plans

It had nothing to do with Saddam or Iraq, but it fit the bill of something that could be sold to the American People as a causus belli or “Reason for war”, or it almost does. Too many Americans know that Iraq and Saddam had nothing to do with the attacks of September 11 so the administration has to come up with something more for those people. They decide to go with Weapons of Mass Destruction and fantasy Iraqi weapons programs like the pilotless drone (remember that?) that Saddam could supposedly launch from Iraq and hit the United States. I know it seems laughable now. The problem is there was no direct evidence that Saddam and Iraq still had weapons of mass destruction.

 3. Bush and the Administration Sell the idea of Iraqi WMD

Bush and the administration go on a year plus long campaign to convince the American people that the Iraqis have a monstrous amount of Weapons of Mass Destruction and that those Weapons could be used to attack us.

 4. Plame and Wilson learn that Bush and the Administration are lying

Valerie Plame, a covert CIA agent, learns from contacts that at least one of the items the Bush administration is pushing as WMD justification is a lie. Plame’s current role in the CIA is “an agency operative assigned to investigate Weapons of Mass Destruction”. Bush said in a State of the Union address that Saddam was “seeking significant quantities of Uranium in Africa”. This claim had long been debunked in intelligence circles and rested on a piece of documentation that was such a poor forgery that anyone with even a modicum of savvy could recognize it as such. An official at the CIA senior to Plame made the request of her husband to go to Africa to investigate the claim without Plame’s involvement and in February of 2002, 13 months before the Iraq war, and 11 months before the State of the Union address where Bush would make the accusation, Wilson went to Niger to investigate the possibility that Saddam Hussein had tried to buy uranium yellowcake. Wilson met with the current Ambassador, Owens-Kirkpatrick, at the embassy, and was informed that she had already debunked that story. Everyone who has seen the documents surrounding the allegation quickly came to the same conclusion. 

5. January 28, 2003 – President Bush delivers his State of the Union address where he makes the accusation that Saddam Hussein has sought significant quantities of Uranium from Africa. 

6. March 6, 2003 - In a report dated 2 weeks BEFORE THE START OF THE IRAQ WAR, The UN Weapons Inspectors indicate they have not found Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq after 4 months of on the ground Inspections 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Bush obstructed justice by commuting Libby's sentence and should be impeached for it

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

An OEN Editor, Steven Leser specializes in Politics, Science & Health, and Entertainment topics. He has held positions within the Democratic Party including District Chair and Public Relations Chair within county organizations. Steven Leser (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Book Recommendations for "Bush Crimes"
The Immaculate Deception: Bush Crime Family Exposed
by Russell S. Bowen

$12.95
Lowest New Price $7.45

Number of pages: 236
Publisher: Bridger House Publishers Inc

George W. Bush, War Criminal?: The Bush Administration's Liability for 269 War Crimes
by Michael Haas

$39.95
Lowest New Price $31.96

Number of pages: 408
Publisher: Praeger

The Immaculate Deception: The Bush Crime Family Exposed
by Russell S. Bowen

$15.00

Number of pages:
Publisher: America West Publishers

A Not So Perfect Crime
by Teresa Solana

$14.95
Lowest New Price $6.00

Number of pages: 295
Publisher: Bitter Lemon Press

View All Book Recommendations

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

FACEBOOK      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      NETSCAPE      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 comments


Leaderless Democrats

 

 

By taking Impeachment “off the table,” Pelosi and Reid have forfeited their right to “leadership” of the Democratic party. Stopping the Cheney/Bush criminal regime in it’s tracks is imperative, and no other issue confronting America is greater than stopping the Almighty Republican Establishment’s national and international crime spree.

"We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality--judiciously, as you will--we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors...and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do." Quote by an anonymous Republican.

That quote exactly describes the situation today, for tomorrow, and for the last six years. You can’t stop a national and international crime wave while allowing the criminals responsible for the crime wave free-reign to continue committing crimes. Republicans are burying us alive under a mountain of corruption that’s getting bigger every day.

Demand that Pelosi and Reid step down and relinquish control of congress. They are either unable to understand that stopping a crime wave requires that you stop the criminals, or they are complicit in the corruption.

Leaderless Democrats can’t win the 2008 presidential elections, and leaders who fail to lead won’t be reelected either. We “little” democrats might not be able to punish Republican criminals, but we damn sure can punish incompetent, or suspiciously enabling Democratic “leaders.”

Impeach, or we’ll stay home on election day.

It’s beginning to look that maybe the only way to crush the greater of two evils is to abandon the lesser evil. After that, Republicans will crash and burn a surely as the sun will rise tomorrow.

 No pain, no gain.

.

 

by rabblerowzer (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 227 comments) on Wednesday, Jul 4, 2007 at 8:21:14 AM

Recommend  (0+)

CIA

You say "Plame’s current role in the CIA is “an agency operative assigned to investigate Weapons of Mass Destruction”" -- this might be rooted in what Novak reported.

You also say "Ms. Wilson served in senior management positions at the CIA, in which she oversaw the work of other CIA employees, and she attained the level of GS-14, step 6 under the federal pay scale.", quoting Waxman.

I've heard some saying Plame was not an "operative" or "agent", but a CIA officer -- senior management, in charge of operations -- and that this is an important distinction. Apparantly, in the CIA, there are distinctions made between officer, operative, agent, or asset -- and calling Plame an operative may be a way of trying to minimize the importance of outing her and the damage done. She also worked under 'unofficial cover', meaning she did not have a diplomatic passport and no diplomatic protection if she was caught: this was a very secret operation, with secrecy being critical for the safety of those involved in it.

It was not just Plame, but the front company and the operation which was exposed, as well as other working in that project, and foreign assets (spies) as well -- whose lives may have been jeopardized. In fact even those innocently associated with the company could have been in danger. In other words, this was a *major* breach of national security and intelligence which should not be allowed to be minimized.

Additionally, the fact that an intelligence operation and personel were exposed by the US government creates a chill on all intelligence operations, and the recruitment of new employees: would you want to work for the agency knowing you could be casually outed by your own government for crass political purposes? If you were a foreign national would you be inclined to trust any American or American company, or anyone who approached you asking that you secretly cooperate in an intelligence operation? This was a major blow to all US intelligence. This is what people who worked for intelligence have said.

by Blue Pilgrim (0 articles, 3 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 997 comments) on Wednesday, Jul 4, 2007 at 8:53:15 AM

Recommend  (0+)

If the Democrats refuse to impeach, they are co-conspirators

and also guilty of obstructing justice.

There are 2 levels of serious crimes here. The smaller is Libby's lying to FBI agents & the grand jury. But the greater by far is how Libby's narrowly-defined obstruction of justice fit into the Bush admin's overall scheme for lying the country into a monstrously unjust war. Libby's participation in outing Plame was part of the admin's attempt to revenge itself on Joe Wilson, who had exposed some of the Bush administration's pre-war lies.

If the Democrats in Congress allow the commuting of Libby's sentence to pass unchallenged, they are saying, in effect, that even if a president lies the country into war, then punishes a respectable citizen (Wilson) for telling the truth, by destroying the career of his CIA-employed wife (itself a violation of a 1982 law), that this behavior is "OK." If the Democrats would not take a stand against that kind of administration behavior, one can only wonder what they would take a stand against. To fail to try to impeach, here, is to say, "We don't care how criminal a US administration is -- they can do whatever they want, and we won't lift a finger to stop them."

As over-the-top as the lawlessness of the Bush regime is, in this case, Democrats' pathetic acceptance of it must be seen as part of the same lawlessness.

by Richard Mynick (2 articles, 4 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 1552 comments [255 recommended, 5 rejected]) on Wednesday, Jul 4, 2007 at 11:53:41 AM

Recommend  (0+)

Reply: Not quite, but I am closer to you on this than on other

disagreements we have. Prosecutors who choose not to prosecute may do so for a number of reasons that have nothing to do with collusion.

That said, I will be looking closely to see exactly what happens here.

by Steven Leser (255 articles, 58 quicklinks, 38 diaries, 2147 comments [63 recommended, 2 rejected]) on Wednesday, Jul 4, 2007 at 12:04:12 PM

Recommend  (0+)

Cindy in NOT amused!

Information clearinghouse   from   common dreams

Call Out The Instigator

By Cindy Sheehan


Call out the Instigator
Because there’s something in the air
We got to get together sooner or later
Because the revolution’s here
You know it’s right!


-Thunderclap Newman

07/04/07 "Common Dreams' -- -- I’m not backing off. I tried to remove myself from the political realm of the US, what BushCo is turning into an Evil Empire, but the blatant audacity of George commuting Scooter’s sentence (he’s not ruling out a full pardon —and you know he will) has dragged me kicking and screaming back in. I can’t sit back and let this BushCo drag our country further down into the murky quagmire of Fascism and violence, taking the rest of the world with them!

I have sat quietly back these past five weeks as the slaughter in Iraq sorrowfully surges along with George’s bloody escalation—and as the philosophical opposition to the war has soared to almost four out of every five Americans. I have remained silent when Senator Barack Obama said that impeachment is only reserved for “grave, grave” breeches! Well, BushCo has created hundreds of thousands of graves dug by their lies and greed. For cripes’ sake, George admitted to breaking the FISA Act (which is a felony) that also breeched the 4th Amendment to our Constitution that already prohibited illegal search and seizure. How was Bill Clinton’s offense graver than George’s, Dick’s, or Scooter’s? Did we ever think that the criminality and arrogance of the Nixon White House would be eclipsed in our time with nary a “baaaah” from the Sheeple in Congress?

George has said that America doesn’t “do torture” when we have all seen the images of torture from Abu Ghraib (don’t believe your lyin’ eyes) and know that hundreds of people sold to the US Army for an immoral bounty are incarcerated within the inhumane confines of Guantanamo Prison which is right in our own back yard.

I have had to bite my tongue – HARD — as the George and Dick crime cabal, (formerly known has the executive branch) have claimed that their offices are not to be held up to the same standards of accountability and control as any other entity in the human race, governmental or private.

It has been recently reported that Nancy Pelosi said that impeachment is not “worth it.” Her faulty reasoning is that impeachment would take too much time because they don’t have the votes. If they could “whip” their own Democratic caucus into shape to defend and protect our Constitution and the people of Iraq and our soldiers as they whupped, cajoled, threatened and browbeat the caucus into attaching “non-binding” time lines onto the last war funding bill, then impeachment would not only be possible, but likely.

The recent commutation of I. Scooter Libby’s sentence, however, was the straw that broke my camel’s back of exhausted ennui. Patrick Fitzgerald is a thoughtful and thorough prosecutor who did a heroic job of bringing at least one of the Bush Crime Mob to justice. Even though we were all very pleased, we knew that it was not enough and that Mr. Fitzgerald would delve deeper into the feces infested executive branch. The lawlessness of the Bush Administration has reached wild west proportions and the inmates definitely have control of the US(A)sylum.
[... more]

by Blue Pilgrim (0 articles, 3 quicklinks, 2 diaries, 997 comments) on Wednesday, Jul 4, 2007 at 4:34:02 PM

Recommend  (0+)

"Bush Impeachment-Libby Commutation Makes It Imperative"

You are right, but I have my doubts whether this will create the stir to finally make Congress take action and impeach Bush and Cheney. So much has happened the War, wiretapping, monitoring our e-mails, torture, kidnapping, detention and torture camps all over the world, and there is  much more. I am fearful that it will take an arranged terriorist attack by Bush and Cheney. They will then declare martial law. I hope not, but the commuting of Libby's sentence, really shows they could give a dam and could very well do the unthinkable!

by Diane_B (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 4 diaries, 26 comments) on Thursday, Jul 5, 2007 at 2:39:45 AM

Recommend  (0+)

Bravo, Mr. Leser

We not always agree but here and now it was  a pleasure to read and agree.  A voice of the free man is a voice of the free man and  no matter what darkness we face, the clear mind of a free man shines from the article.

Thanks, Mr, Leser

 I can live with your sympathy to  Dems:)

by Mark Sashine (72 articles, 19 quicklinks, 269 diaries, 4101 comments [130 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Thursday, Jul 5, 2007 at 8:00:55 AM

Recommend  (0+)

Reply: Thank you sir!

Please check out the one I wrote today as a followup!

by Steven Leser (255 articles, 58 quicklinks, 38 diaries, 2147 comments [63 recommended, 2 rejected]) on Thursday, Jul 5, 2007 at 3:34:25 PM

Recommend  (0+)

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

South Africa Woolworth's Removes Aspartame by Stephen Fox

Rothschild's Federal Reserve Must Be Abolished by Allen L Roland

Photo Essay: Thoughts for the Fourth of July: Talking the Talk and Walking the Walk for Peace by Mac McKinney

Health Insurance Exec Whistleblower Wendell Potter Testifies Before Congress by Wendell Potter

Tennessee's Law Allowing Guns in Bars Doesn't Go Far Enough by Grant Lawrence

Israeli Embassy Correspondence Concerning Spirit of Humanity Capture Clarifies Centuries of Conflict by Meryl Ann Butler

McKinney Relocated from Israeli Prison by Meryl Ann Butler

Dept. of State Spokesman Addresses McKinney's Capture by Meryl Ann Butler

Torture on the 4th of July by Lawrence Gist

Our Nation has a Great Deal to Learn from Phillip Butler about Morality, Law, and Torture by Lawrence Gist

Go To Top 50 Most Popular

 

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum