Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 6 (9 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   7 comments

General News

The Egyptian Tinderbox: How Banks and Investors Are Starving the Third World

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 7   Well Said 5   News 5  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 2/4/11

Become a Fan
  (182 fans)
- Advertisement -

                    "What for a poor man is a crust, for a rich man is a securitized asset class."

                     --Futures trader Ann Berg, quoted in the UK Guardian

Underlying the sudden, volatile uprising in Egypt and Tunisia is a growing global crisis sparked by soaring food prices and unemployment.   The Associated Press reports that roughly 40 percent of Egyptians struggle along at the World Bank-set poverty level of under $2 per day.   Analysts estimate that food price inflation in Egypt is currently at an unsustainable 17 percent yearly.   In poorer countries, as much as 60 to 80 percent of people's incomes go for food, compared to just 10 to 20 percent in industrial countries.   An increase of a dollar or so in the cost of a gallon of milk or a loaf of bread for Americans can mean starvation for people in Egypt and other poor countries.

Follow the Money

The cause of the recent jump in global food prices remains a matter of debate.   Some analysts blame the Federal Reserve's "quantitative easing" program (increasing the money supply with credit created with accounting entries), which they warn is sparking hyperinflation.   Too much money chasing too few goods is the classic explanation for rising prices.  

The problem with that theory is that the global money supply has actually shrunk since 2006, when food prices began their dramatic rise.   Virtually all money today is created on the books of banks as "credit" or "debt," and overall lending has shrunk.   This has occurred in an accelerating process of deleveraging (paying down or writing off loans and not making new ones), as the subprime housing market has collapsed and bank capital requirements have been raised.   Although it seems counterintuitive, the more debt there is, the more money there is in the system.   As debt shrinks, the money supply shrinks in tandem.  

That is why government debt today is not actually the bugaboo it is being made out to be by the deficit terrorists.   The flipside of debt is credit, and businesses run on it.   When credit collapses, trade collapses.   When private debt shrinks, public debt must therefore step in to replace it.   The "good" credit or debt is the kind used for building infrastructure and other productive capacity, increasing the Gross Domestic Product and wages; and this is the kind governments are in a position to employ.   The parasitic forms of credit or debt are the gamblers' money-making-money schemes, which add nothing to GDP.

Prices have been driven up by too much money chasing too few goods, but the money is chasing only certain selected goods.   Food and fuel prices are up, but housing prices are down.   The net result is that overall price inflation remains low.  

- Advertisement -

While quantitative easing may not be the culprit, Fed action has driven the rush into commodities.   In response to the banking crisis of 2008, the Federal Reserve dropped the Fed funds rate (the rate at which banks borrow from each other) nearly to zero.   This has allowed banks and their customers to borrow in the U.S. at very low rates and invest abroad for higher returns, creating a dollar "carry trade."  

Meanwhile, interest rates on federal securities were also driven to very low levels, leaving investors without that safe, stable option for funding their retirements.   "Hot money" -" investment seeking higher returns -" fled from the collapsed housing market into anything but the dollar, which generally meant fleeing into commodities.  

New Meaning to the Old Adage "Don't Play with Your Food"

At one time food was considered a poor speculative investment, because it was too perishable to be stored until market conditions were right for resale.   But that changed with the development of ETFs (exchange-traded funds) and other financial innovations.  

As first devised, speculation in food futures was fairly innocuous, since when the contract expired, somebody actually had to buy the product at the "spot" or cash price.   This forced the fanciful futures price and the more realistic spot price into alignment.   But that changed in 1991.   In a revealing July 2010 report in Harper's Magazine titled "The Food Bubble: How Wall Street Starved Millions and Got Away with It," Frederick Kaufman wrote:

- Advertisement -

The history of food took an ominous turn in 1991, at a time when no one was paying much attention.   That was the year Goldman Sachs decided our daily bread might make an excellent investment. . . .

Robber barons, gold bugs, and financiers of every stripe had long dreamed of controlling all of something everybody needed or desired, then holding back the supply as demand drove up prices.

As Kaufman explained this financial innovation in a July 16 interview on Democracy Now:

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


Ellen Brown is an attorney, founder of the Public Banking Institute, and author of twelve books including the best-selling WEB OF DEBT. In THE PUBLIC BANK SOLUTION, her latest book, she explores successful public banking models historically and (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

It's the Derivatives, Stupid! Why Fannie, Freddie and AIG Had to Be Bailed Out

Mysterious Prison Buses in the Desert


Libya: All About Oil, or All About Central Banking?

Borrowing from Peter to Pay Paul: The Wall Street Ponzi Scheme Called Fractional Reserve Banking

"Oops, We Meant $7 TRILLION!" What Hank and Ben Are Up to and How They Plan to Pay for It All


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

New Zealand (where I live) is very susceptible to ... by Dr Stuart Jeanne Bramhall on Friday, Feb 4, 2011 at 6:55:40 PM
Interesting! I'd like to hear more about how the ... by Ellen Brown on Saturday, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:42:25 AM
OBAMA = STALIN = BUSH".WHO, WHY, AND HOW RUINED YO... by vser on Saturday, Feb 5, 2011 at 6:23:53 AM
OBAMA = STALIN = BUSH".WHO, WHY, AND HOW RUINED YO... by vser on Saturday, Feb 5, 2011 at 8:22:34 AM
OBAMA = STALIN = BUSH".WHO, WHY, AND HOW RUINED YO... by vser on Saturday, Feb 5, 2011 at 8:46:34 AM
Excellent article! I read it after I posted mine ... by Bud Goodall on Saturday, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:01:50 PM
Behind all the hype in the corporate media regardi... by R A Bows on Sunday, Feb 6, 2011 at 10:01:30 AM