Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 20 (20 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   22 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Palin flunks two GED Interviews

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Well Said 4   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 9/28/08

Become a Fan
  (9 fans)
It is probably unfair to use the GED or General Equivalency Diploma as an example of something so easy an idiot (caveman?) could pass it, but in keeping with my opening theme of looking at Palin as if Chris Rock was doing the commentary, I'll just have to ask everyone's forgiveness.

Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric didn't ask Palin difficult, misleading or gotcha questions. To paraphrase Chris Rock regarding Michael Jackson, Charlie Gibson and Katie Couric tried their best, they asked Sarah Palin the easiest questions in the world, the easist GED questions in the world and Governor Palin could not pass the test. Katie Couric was like, "Governor Palin, do you really think that being able to see Russia on a clear day from your house means that you have foreign policy experience". And Sarah Palin said 'Yes!'. Couric said "Let me rephrase the question, "Have you ever been in any negotiations with Russians". To which Palin replied "It's very important when you consider even national-security issues with Russia as Putin rears his head and comes into the airspace of the United States of America. Where-where do they go? It's Alaska."

As good as she is at trying to hide her reactions, Couric had this look on her face like she was thinking, "Are you CRAZY????"

Of course, if you go to Free Republic or any conservative leaning website, they talk about how Gibson and Couric tried to trip up Palin. Tried to trip her up? They did everything to help her but try to answer the questions for her. Couric gave Palin a free question to clarify her earlier remarks from the Charles Gibson interview on Russia and she could not come up with a better answer than the one she gave to Gibson a week earlier. How is that possible? How can it be that her handlers didnt make her come up with a better answer in advance? How can it be that she didnt spend time thinking about a better answer on her own?

Fareed Zakaria's latest article in Newsweek is even more critical of Palin's abilities than I am. It's titled "Palin Is Ready? Please." http://www.newsweek.com/id/161204 . Zakaria comes right out and asks "Will someone please put Sarah Palin out of her agony? Is it too much to ask that she come to realize that she wants, in that wonderful phrase in American politics, "to spend more time with her family"?

Zakaria characterizes a Palin answer to Couric on the economy as "a vapid emptying out of every catchphrase about economics that came into her head. Some commentators, like CNN's Campbell Brown, have argued that it's sexist to keep Sarah Palin under wraps, as if she were a delicate flower who might wilt under the bright lights of the modern media. But the more Palin talks, the more we see that it may not be sexism but common sense that's causing the McCain campaign to treat her like a time bomb."

Come on Fareed, tell us what you really think! (p.s. I agree)



The overwhelming consensus that Palin is not anywhere near being ready to assume the duties of Vice President let alone and perish the thought of President, brings an interesting perspective to one of the tactics (yes, John, T-A-C-T-I-C-S) of John McCain in last night's debate where he tried to characterize Obama as unready and not getting it. Senator McCain, why don't YOU get it that the country is in the kind of financial and foreign policy mess that requires the best possible people running it and that because of your choice, instead we could get woefully unready Sarah Palin at the helm? That is bad judgment, Senator McCain, and YOU DON'T GET IT.

The last thing I will say about the two interviews I will say through a video from my favorite curmogeonly old man, Jack Cafferty




The question I would ask my readers is, if she is able to 'cram' enough information to make a passable show at the Vice Presidential debate, should that matter? We know how little she knows and we know that she isnt ready. If she is able to somehow come close enough in performance during the debate to Joe Biden, would that mean anything? I give a one in ten thousand possibility of Palin making a good show at the debate, but it is possible. Should that mean anything if it happens. Does that all of a sudden make her able to have what it takes to be President? Do you think the average American would think it means something? My opinion is that the debates add a little context to what we have already seen from the candidates. If we arent sure if someone is ready to be President or Vice President, but we dont think it is totally out of the realm of possibility, the debates help us see that one way or the other. I dont think the debates were meant for someone so unfit and unready as Palin to be able to have the best 90 minutes of their lives and be crowned as ready for the White House or Naval Observatory.

I say this nearly a week in advance, because I remember the farce that was Palin's appearance at the Republican National Convention. I realize that someone else wrote her speech and that it was telepromptered, and the performance didnt mean anything to me, but the punditry turned it into some sort of marvelous event and achievement. Is it possible for something like that to happen again. I hope not. I hope Sarah Palin displays exactly what her level of experience and readyness is at the debate and the punditry call it exactly what it is.

 

http://www.ibtimes.com/blog/steven-leser_103/bio/

A political blogger for the International Business Times, Steve Leser is a hot national political pundit. He has appeared on MSNBC's Coundown with Keith Olbermann, Comedy Central's Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Russia Today's (RT) Crosstalk with (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

McCain Campaign Violated McCain-Feingold law with Palin Clothing Purchases

McCain attacked 18 year old Chelsea Clinton in 1998 now says Palin's family & kids are off limits

McCain says "Horseshit" on National TV During Debate

North Korea – Impending Missile Launch May Require US Military Action

Palin: Drill Baby Drill, but blame Obama for the Spill!

Palin to McCain - Oops I did it Again

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
15 people are discussing this page, with 22 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I don't put anything past McCain. Mrs. Palin c... by Linda Bailey on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:37:56 AM
the thing that concerns me is that somehow, this p... by Steven Leser on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:47:52 AM
After the debate, do you think McCain feeding her ... by Mary Callaghan on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 12:04:26 PM
Alaska is an important part of the US.  OIL! ... by Margaret Bassett on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:36:26 AM
Our greatest concern should be that what you have ... by Sherwin Steffin on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:00:55 PM
... Palin's polling has plummeted over the las... by Steven Leser on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 3:39:50 PM
Sarah Palin - The Best the Republicans have to off... by Viki_FL on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:16:47 PM
and Viki, you wont hear me say many good things ab... by Steven Leser on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 3:42:21 PM
I still for the life of me cannot figure out why P... by jeffrey faulkner on Tuesday, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:02:56 AM
I still for the life of me cannot figure out why P... by jeffrey faulkner on Tuesday, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:05:38 AM
Give the corporate media propagandists their due o... by Dennis Kaiser on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 5:25:37 PM
YOU still don't "get it". Palin IS A... by Tony Forest on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:17:37 PM
... but understand how that sounds to women. See t... by Steven Leser on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 3:35:37 PM
with all due respect, I have not insulted America&... by Tony Forest on Monday, Sep 29, 2008 at 1:28:54 PM
My response to you was after reading Shirleys belo... by Steven Leser on Tuesday, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:34:15 PM
Where are you looking? Under a rock? OMG. Palin is... by shirley reese on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 2:36:29 PM
I keep asking who are the people that could possib... by virginius "gin" arnold on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:21:33 PM
That Biden, Obama, McCain, Palin, etc., are all un... by Armon Pacetti on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 4:26:35 PM
I'm very happy with Obama and am looking forwa... by Steven Leser on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 5:36:27 PM
But he is the best candidate in a presidential gen... by JC Garrett on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 6:36:20 PM
She reminds me of "The President" in &qu... by Maxwell on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:12:38 PM
We all know the women's place in republican po... by bucketslogg on Sunday, Sep 28, 2008 at 9:52:36 PM