Over 4,000 American soldiers lost their lives fighting in George W. Bush's war in Iraq on "false pretenses" constituting "unlawful deaths" as noted and documented by renowned prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi in his stunning, best selling true crime book "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder", Link CLICK HERE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pl8jWO0ck0 

"The preferable venue for the prosecution of George W. Bush for murder and conspiracy to commit murder would be in the nation's capital, with the prosecutor being the Attorney General of the United States acting through his Department of Justice. This book, however, establishes jurisdiction for any state attorney general (or any district attorney in any county of a state) to bring murder and conspiracy charges against Bush for any soldiers from that state or county who lost their lives fighting Bush's war, which as you can see applies to every state in this nation", excerpt taken from "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder".

by Gene Cappa (43 articles, 29 quicklinks, 113 diaries, 349 comments [37 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:37:38 AM

  (0+)

Keep on going and never give up...this country can not survive this catastrophe without Bush et al being called to account for their numerous immoral and ILLEGAL actios. 

They have set the worst scariest precedent ever and have set the stage for this country's downfall.

THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH for doing everyhting you can to save us and to restore homor, dignity and faith to a sinking and suffering people. 

Your fellow patriot, Linda Ann

by Linda Alvarez (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 9 comments) on Friday, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:17:19 AM

  (0+)

Awesome, thanks, Linda! I'm sorry I missed this event, but with your stunning article, I felt like I was right there!

by Meryl Ann Butler (70 articles, 82 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 722 comments [29 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:33:17 PM

  (0+)

And I'm encouraging everyone to read it.  Including my selected non-representative officials.

by August Adams (11 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 585 comments [12 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Friday, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:33:29 PM

  (0+)

- on Green Island - and a lot of other stuff OEN readers will probably find makes them wish they were there  - http://www.rudemacedon.ca/greenisland/ex/gw19.html

 Green Island http://www.rudemacedon.ca/greenisland.html 

by siamdave (4 articles, 0 quicklinks, 1 diaries, 85 comments [3 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Saturday, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:04:42 AM

  (0+)

Great articule Ms. Milazzo. I bought the book and have read it from cover to cover, I urge everyone to read Vincent's book. It is logical, conforms to the law and puts a blueprint out for the crimes the President is accused of doing as the leader of our Country. I sure hope the Dean of Andover Law School is reading the book prior to his convention in September of Legal minds about the impeachment and/or ability to get Bush for War Crimes.

by Tommytoons (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 14 comments) on Saturday, Jun 28, 2008 at 6:53:13 AM

  (0+)

If George Bush is guilty of so many murders then we should also not let his accomplices, and there are many, go without criticism or punishment.

Clearly others in the administration and cabinet should be considered accomplices, but there are other accomplices in the leadership in Congress and its committees. For that matter, there are individuals in the media that played and continue to play a role in helping Bush and others get away with murder and other crimes.

Seriously, I doubt whether any of these privileged people will ever be held to account, but I do think that demonstrates a fundamental flaw in our governmental system. The founders were expecting too much in thinking that individuals inside a branch of government could hold others in that same branch to account, and that is how our current system is supposed to work.

by PrMaine (13 articles, 13 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 511 comments [22 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Saturday, Jun 28, 2008 at 8:00:19 AM

  (0+)

There should be no privileges and privileged under Justice, and Justice for all is what is required here, for them and for us.

And this requires a swoop to be made to hold the malefactors and all their dual-nationality manipulators and motivators before they all head for other 'homelands'.  And most particularly before they can start any more wars and claim the plenary powers of 'The Presidency during wartime', which would make 'treason' of any attempts at apprehension.

by amazin (34 articles, 0 quicklinks, 12 diaries, 400 comments [12 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 12:00:03 PM

  (0+)

Years ago I was greatly impressed with Vince Bugliosi's book about OJ Simpson's killing of his wife and her friend. I'm sure that Bugliosi is just as impressive in this book and will convince most of his readers - and listeners in the personal presentations - that George W Bush is guilty of murder. This is only because those who are and/or become so convinced hold the view that words are equivalent to deeds. Or maybe they haven't thought about it sufficiently.

Yes, Bush ordered US troops into battle - a war, though undeclared by Congress as required by the Constitution - for the specific purpose of destroying property, capturing specific individuals and killing those parties and others if necessary. But Bush never fired a physical shot at any of those he declared as targets to be harmed by others. Those who followed his orders - passed down through the chain of command - did the shooting of guns, dropping of bombs, firing of missiles and committing of other forms of violence on individuals resulting in their deaths. He most definitely was part (if only the titular leader) of verbal and written maneuvers for concealing the truth from members of Congress, the US public and virtually everyone else about facts occurring in Iraq (and Afghanistan) so as to justify why thousands of US troops should commit the harmful acts that are part of their military training.

While Bush is a most despicable person for the deceit and factual manipulation he has been party to (if not orchestrated), he did not himself commit murder or perform any other violent act. I would like to see him thoroughly ostracized - no one willing to associate with him for any reason. This would include no one seeking him for speaking engagements, book writings, charitable group leadership, think tank participation, or even BBQ attendance - all activities common for former presidents, which he is soon to be. For thoroughness, ostracism would also encompass refusals by everyone to do business with him - whether to sell him a suit, cut his hair, serve him a meal and everything else. This is the extreme result of negative social preferencing by large numbers of individuals towards someone assessed by them to be of negative value and therefore that any association with that person would continue this negative value in the world. In centuries past, such an ostracized person had to fend for himself in the wild or die. In the case of Bush, I am quite sure that he would not survive a week totally on his own in the wilds; or much longer even in the modern world if truly ostracized.

So although Bugliosi I am sure has written a captivating book, the inescapable fact remains that Bush himself used millions of words, verbally and in writing, to convince others to actually kill or support (in action or words) that killing while he himself did no killing. He's definitely guilty of presenting large amounts of distorted and manipulated facts and some likely actual fabrications, as part of his attempts to convince all those who have done what and thought what they did - but he still himself did no killing. It is obvious that he's been highly influential, but only with people who were impressed by his high authoritative office and/or suspicious of groups very unlike themselves and who failed to avail themselves of copious amounts of available information or chose to ignore it. However, US military troops (voluntary, not conscripted) being convinced or given justification by the verbal machinations of Bush does not change the the fact that they - not he - committed the killing acts. How those individuals who were actual parties to killings deal with that fact is another issue, but blaming it on Bush (and also those who participated with him) is avoidance of self-responsibility for one's own actions.


**Kitty Antonik Wakfer

MoreLife for the rational - http://morelife.org
Reality based tools for more life in quantity and quality
Self-Sovereign Individual Project - http://selfsip.org
Self-sovereignty, rational pursuit of optimal lifetime happiness,
individual responsibility, social preferencing & social contracting

by Kitty Antonik Wakfer (26 articles, 28 quicklinks, 9 diaries, 163 comments [15 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Saturday, Jun 28, 2008 at 11:57:00 AM

  (0+)

Wafker makes many good points, but the fact is that Bush ordered the murders, his order being effective only because it was based on a huge lie.  What about Nuremburg?  Yes, the British and Americans should have been prosecuted too, for the vicious pyro and nuclear bombings, a sad reminder that victors go free.  Gangsters who order killings have been prosecuted for murder.  There have been several similar cases inwestern Virginia where spouses have contracted others to murder and have been prosecuted for the crime.  There is plenty of legal precedence to hang W.

 Frank Munley 

by Frank Munley (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments) on Saturday, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:53:02 PM

  (0+)

Ms. Wakfer, I apologize for misspelling your name.

 Frank Munley 

by Frank Munley (1 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 3 comments) on Saturday, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:57:48 PM

  (0+)

I am very well aware of the current legal systems' precedences of charging and trying for murder (and even convicting many of) some of those who have given the orders for such actions while not actually physically participating in them - not pulling the trigger, dropping bombs, firing missiles, throwing gernades/spears, thrusting knives, administering the poison, etc.  I am arguing from a different set of principles - those of the theory of Social Meta-Needs.

**Kitty Antonik Wakfer

MoreLife for the rational - http://morelife.org
Reality based tools for more life in quantity and quality
Self-Sovereign Individual Project - http://selfsip.org
Self-sovereignty, rational pursuit of optimal lifetime happiness,
individual responsibility, social preferencing & social contracting

by Kitty Antonik Wakfer (26 articles, 28 quicklinks, 9 diaries, 163 comments [15 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 8:20:24 PM

  (0+)

I rather believe Bush & company are guilty of Genocide, ecocide and 320,000 American Vet suicides.

I'm sure had I done all that lying resulting in all the deaths, and if You had done all that, we'd already be dead, hung, injected, or electricuted.

Entire States must rise up against the Whitehouse in 2/3 majority for such a case to occur. Congress ppl that have obsructed such a case must also be held accountable for doing such.

It's time to "abolish or alter" the Government that has "become destructive to these ends". Walking papers for the whole of them.

by shirley reese (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 592 comments [98 recommended, 1 rejected]) on Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 11:32:15 AM

  (0+)

Excellent article and good for Mr. Bugliosi, the world could use more people like him.
Mark

by DGCmagazine (7 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 5 comments) on Saturday, Jul 5, 2008 at 7:57:56 AM

  (0+)

After reading his book on JFK I dont trust Bug.  His book is 1600 pages of straw dog.  No on THAT CASE  I DONT think its possible to have "an honest difference of opinion"  On THAT case.

by Nathaniel Heidenheimer (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 47 comments) on Sunday, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:33:52 AM

  (0+)