Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments, In Series: Reviews: Books, Movies
OpEdNews Op Eds

Lions for Lambs; Movie Review

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Rob Kall     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (307 fans)
- Advertisement -
When I saw that Robert Redford and Meryl Streep were going to be in a movie together, I was psyched.

Then, today, I saw a dismal review of the movie in the Wall Street Journal, where actually, I NEVER read movie reviews.

- Advertisement -
Here's a bit of what the WSJ reviewer had to say,
...so many of its issues -- domestic politics, the Middle East, the clash of civilizations -- are debated with such steadfast self-importance. Eventually, though, they're all reduced to a snoozeful thrum by a process that works like noise-canceling headphones -- every speech, stance or position has its nullifying opposite.
The fact is, the WSJ reviewer just doesn't get this movie. He sees the reporter, layed by Streep, as "a sappy parody of timorous liberalism."

And, he describes Redford's professor character and the professor's students;
"Stephen Malley, the professor played by Mr. Redford -- who also directed, with a leaden touch -- peddles only banalities in urging a bright, disaffected student to step up to the task of changing the system. Then there's the ambiguous plight of two of Malley's former students. They stepped up by joining up; now they're soldiers facing death from enemy fire in the deep snow of Afghanistan. Are they victims of Sen. Irving's hawkishness, or of liberal reluctance to prosecute an all-out war? No way to know.

Now, the WSJ is great for hard news reporting, one of the best. But when it comes to editorials, it's a joke, and clearly, reading the nasty review of this movie, I decided that if the WSJ hated it, I'd love it.

The fact is, there is a lot of talking, a lot of opinion writ in dialogue.

Then there's Tom Cruise. I think he's perfectly cast for the role of a shallow, vapid, arrogant right wing politician, who self-righteously thinks he knows it all. Perfect!!

- Advertisement -
The long talking, to me, represents what too many of us do-- talk and talk and talk, without getting anything done or changed.

The students who become soldiers-- they are probably the best actors in this drama. But there's no question, at the end of why they died, except, perhaps for a right wingnut who's totally drank and drowned in the koolaid.

The suprise ending for this movie will leave you departing the theater in a somber, serious, possibly angry state. The final result of the movie is powerful. Make sure you stay to watch the images that appear after the end. They give a message to you.

As a liberal or progressive, the message you'll get from the movie is very different from the WSJ review. And for all the middle of the roaders, independents and moderates who go to see a flick with three big name stars, they will not translate it like the WSJ either. They'll see it the way Redford directed it, as a powerful message against the war, against the mainstream media and against the lousy pentagon leadership.

And all will see the soldiers for the brave, betrayed souls they are.

This is a movie worth seeing. It does have a few spots where the talking goes on, without a lot of action. But it's worth it. Kudos to Redford for telling a story that delivers a powerful message.
- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Rob Kall has spent his adult life as an awakener and empowerer-- first in the field of biofeedback, inventing products, developing software and a music recording label, MuPsych, within the company he founded in 1978-- Futurehealth, and founding, organizing and running 3 conferences: Winter Brain, on Neurofeedback and consciousness, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology (a pioneer in the field of Positive Psychology, first presenting workshops on it in 1985) and Storycon Summit Meeting on the Art Science and Application of Story-- each the first of their kind. Then, when he found the process of raising people's consciousness and empowering them to take more control of their lives one person at a time was too slow, he founded Opednews.com-- which has been the top search result on Google for the terms liberal news and progressive opinion for several years. Rob began his Bottom-up Radio show, broadcast on WNJC 1360 AM to Metro Philly, also available on iTunes, covering the transition of our culture, business and world from predominantly Top-down (hierarchical, centralized, authoritarian, patriarchal, big) to bottom-up (egalitarian, local, interdependent, grassroots, archetypal feminine and small.) Recent long-term projects include a book, Bottom-up-- The Connection Revolution, debillionairizing the planet and the Psychopathy Defense and Optimization Project.

Rob Kall Wikipedia Page

Rob Kall's Bottom Up Radio Show: Over 200 podcasts are archived for downloading here, or can be accessed from iTunes. Rob is also published regularly on the Huffingtonpost.com

Rob is, with (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Debunking Hillary's Specious Winning the Popular Vote Claim

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Hillary's Disingenuous Claim That She's Won 2.5 Million More Votes is Bogus. Here's why

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver