Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 9 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing Summarizing
Sci Tech      

Twelve Hiroshima Bombs Per Second

By       (Page 1 of 6 pages)   1 comment

Jim Baird
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Jim Baird
Become a Fan
  (1 fan)
The invisible energy accumulation that defines the real climate crisis

Published originally on Substack.

Twelve Hiroshima Bombs Per Second
Twelve Hiroshima Bombs Per Second
(Image by Jim Baird)
  Details   DMCA

Last year, the world's oceans absorbed a record amount of heat, equivalent to twelve Hiroshima-scale explosions every second.

Not metaphorically.
Thermodynamically.

Over the course of a single year, that adds up to roughly 378 million Hiroshima bombs' worth of energy quietly absorbed by seawater. No flash. No sound. No ruins photographed from above. Just heat, banked in the largest thermal reservoir on Earth.

Spread across the planet's surface, about 510 million square kilometers, that is roughly 1.35 Hiroshima bombs per square kilometer, added in just one year.

The Hiroshima bomb's immediate lethal zone covered roughly 13 square kilometers. In energy terms, global warming added the equivalent of more than ten planet-wide kill zones to the ocean in a single year.

And then we did it again.

A Century of Accumulation, Not a Single Event

This was not an anomaly.
It was part of a century-long trend.

For more than 100 years, the oceans have been absorbing the vast majority of excess heat trapped by greenhouse gases-- over 90 percent. The atmosphere gets the headlines, but the ocean keeps the books.

Every year, we add to the balance.
None of it is erased.

Unlike air temperatures, which fluctuate seasonally, ocean heat is durable. Once driven below the surface, it remains locked within the system, slowly migrating through layers of water that circulate on timescales far longer than those of politics, markets, or human lifespans.

Through the thermohaline circulation-- the great global conveyor belt that moves heat and salt through the deep ocean-- this energy will be recirculated back to the surface over roughly 1,000 to 1,500 years.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Jim Baird Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter Page       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Inventor: Method and apparatus for load balancing trapped solar energy OTEC Counter-Current Heat Transfer System Global Warming Mitigation Method Subductive Waste Disposal Method Nuclear Assisted Hydrocarbon Production Method

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter

Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Science and politics disregard the climate lessons of Nature and mankind is failed as a consequence.

The Willie Sutton/Will Rogers Approach to Energy

Artificial Intelligence - Real Heat

Global-warming Placebo versus the Remedy

The Thermodynamic Reckoning

The Practical Implication of the Global Warming Hiatus.

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments


Jim Baird

Become a Fan
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Jul 15, 2010), 1 fan, 15 articles, 32 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member although Facebook page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Twitter page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Linkedin page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Instagram page url on login Profile is filled in

  New Content

Last year, the world's oceans absorbed heat equivalent to roughly twelve Hiroshima-scale explosions every second. There was no flash, no shockwave, no single moment that demanded attention-- only energy, quietly stored in seawater. Over the course of a year, that accumulation rivals hundreds of millions of nuclear detonations in raw energetic terms.

This heat did not vanish. More than 90 percent of the excess energy trapped by greenhouse gases ends up in the ocean, where it drives sea-level rise, fuels stronger storms, disrupts marine ecosystems, and alters rainfall and food systems on land. Unlike atmospheric warming, ocean heat persists for centuries, circulating slowly through deep currents that commit future generations to long-lasting climate impacts regardless of near-term emissions reductions.

Climate change is therefore not just an emissions problem-- it is a heat-accumulation problem. And until policy confronts the energy already stored in the ocean, rather than focusing solely on future carbon flows, the real scale and duration of climate risk will remain dangerously underestimated.

Submitted on Friday, Jan 23, 2026 at 3:48:24 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment


 

Tell A Friend