Cindy Sheehan has been working tirelessly to end US occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan, motivated by social injustice, the crimes of war and most of all the passing of her son, who was killed in Iraq on April 4, 2004 [Getty]
"The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience." - Albert Camus
Recently, the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) raided the homes of at least eight anti-war/social justice activists here in the US.
I happen to be a prominent anti-war activist myself, and have joked that I am a "little hurt" that I was not raided and perhaps I should try harder. Even though, we have the urge to try and be light-hearted in this time of an increasing police state, with civil liberties on the retreat, it really isn't funny considering that the activists could face some serious charges stemming from these raids.
I have felt this harassment on a smaller scale myself and I know that defending oneself against a police state that has unlimited resources, time and cruelty, can be quite expensive, time consuming and annoying.
There is nothing noble about an agency that has reduced itself to
being jackbooted enforcers of a neo-fascist police state, no matter how
much the FBI has been romanticised in movies, television and books.
These raids have terrifying implications for dissent here in the US.
First of all, these US citizens have been long-time and devoted
anti-war activists who organised an anti-war rally that was violently
suppressed by the US police state in Minneapolis-St. Paul, during the
2008 Republican National Convention. Because the Minneapolis activists
have integrity, they had already announced that they would do the same
if the Democrats hold their convention there in 2012.
I have
observed that it was one thing to be anti-Bush, but to be anti-war in
the age of Obama is not to be tolerated by many people. If you will also
notice, the only people who seem to know about the raids are those of
us already in the movement. There has been no huge outcry over this
fresh outrage, either by the so-called movement or the corporate media.
I submit that if George Bush were still president, or if this
happened under a McCain/Palin regime, there would be tens of thousands
of people in the streets to protest. This is one of the reasons an
escalation in police state oppression is so much more dangerous under
Obama - even now, he gets a free pass from the very same people who
should be adamantly opposed to such policies.
Secondly, I
believe because the raids happened to basically "unsung' and unknown,
but very active workers in the movement, that the coordinated, early
morning home invasions were designed to intimidate and frighten those of
us who are still doing the work. The Obama regime would like nothing
better than for us to shut up or go underground and to quit embarrassing
it by pointing out its abject failures and highlighting its obvious
crimes.
Just look at how the Democrats are demonising activists who are
trying to point out the inconvenient truth that the country (under a
near Democratic tyranny) is sliding further into economic collapse,
environmental decay and perpetual war for enormous profit.
Barack and Joe, the commandantes
of this police state, say that those who have the temerity to be
critical are "asleep" and just need to "buck up". White House
spokesperson, Robert Gibbs, recently stated that we on the "professional
left" need to be "drug tested" if we are not addicted to the regimes'
own drug: the Hopium of the Obama propaganda response team.
It
seems like, even though some of those that have been nailed to the cross
of national security do activism around South America, most of the
activism is anti-war and pro-Palestinian rights. Being supportive of any
Arab or Muslim, no matter how benign or courageous is a very dangerous
activity here in post-9/11 America.
The Supreme Court just
decided (Wilner v. National Security Agency) that the National Security
Agency (NSA) did not have to disclose if it was using warrantless
wiretapping to spy on attorneys representing the extra-legal detention
of prisoners in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Obtaining warrants, with cause,
and attorney-client privilege were important principles of the US
justice system, but even the neo-fascist Supreme Court is undermining
the law - talk about "activist" judges!
Not only have activists
been targeted here in the States, but Obama has ominously declared
himself judge, jury and executioner of anyone that he deems a national
security "threat". These are the actions of a tyrant and another assault
against our rights and against the rule of law from a person who
promised "complete transparency" from his administration.
We
have learned that Obama's first victim under his presidential execution
program is Anwar al-Awlaki, a US-born Muslim who is now in Yemen.
Without showing proof of al-Awlaki's so-called executionable offenses
and without a trial in a court of law, Obama has unloosed his hit squads
on Awlaki. Is there anyone out there reading this who does not believe,
or fear, that this programme could quickly descend into summary
executions within the borders of the US?
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
1
1
1
