Cindy Sheehan has been working tirelessly to end US occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan, motivated by social injustice, the crimes of war and most of all the passing of her son, who was killed in Iraq on April 4, 2004 [Getty]
"The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience." - Albert Camus
Recently, the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) raided the homes of at least eight anti-war/social justice activists here in the US.
I happen to be a prominent anti-war activist myself, and have joked that I am a "little hurt" that I was not raided and perhaps I should try harder. Even though, we have the urge to try and be light-hearted in this time of an increasing police state, with civil liberties on the retreat, it really isn't funny considering that the activists could face some serious charges stemming from these raids.
I have felt this harassment on a smaller scale myself and I know that defending oneself against a police state that has unlimited resources, time and cruelty, can be quite expensive, time consuming and annoying.
There is nothing noble about an agency that has reduced itself to
being jackbooted enforcers of a neo-fascist police state, no matter how
much the FBI has been romanticised in movies, television and books.
These raids have terrifying implications for dissent here in the US.
First of all, these US citizens have been long-time and devoted
anti-war activists who organised an anti-war rally that was violently
suppressed by the US police state in Minneapolis-St. Paul, during the
2008 Republican National Convention. Because the Minneapolis activists
have integrity, they had already announced that they would do the same
if the Democrats hold their convention there in 2012.
I submit that if George Bush were still president, or if this
happened under a McCain/Palin regime, there would be tens of thousands
of people in the streets to protest. This is one of the reasons an
escalation in police state oppression is so much more dangerous under
Obama - even now, he gets a free pass from the very same people who
should be adamantly opposed to such policies.
Secondly, I believe because the raids happened to basically "unsung' and unknown, but very active workers in the movement, that the coordinated, early morning home invasions were designed to intimidate and frighten those of us who are still doing the work. The Obama regime would like nothing better than for us to shut up or go underground and to quit embarrassing it by pointing out its abject failures and highlighting its obvious crimes.
Just look at how the Democrats are demonising activists who are
trying to point out the inconvenient truth that the country (under a
near Democratic tyranny) is sliding further into economic collapse,
environmental decay and perpetual war for enormous profit.
Barack and Joe, the commandantes of this police state, say that those who have the temerity to be critical are "asleep" and just need to "buck up". White House spokesperson, Robert Gibbs, recently stated that we on the "professional left" need to be "drug tested" if we are not addicted to the regimes' own drug: the Hopium of the Obama propaganda response team.
It seems like, even though some of those that have been nailed to the cross of national security do activism around South America, most of the activism is anti-war and pro-Palestinian rights. Being supportive of any Arab or Muslim, no matter how benign or courageous is a very dangerous activity here in post-9/11 America.
Not only have activists been targeted here in the States, but Obama has ominously declared himself judge, jury and executioner of anyone that he deems a national security "threat". These are the actions of a tyrant and another assault against our rights and against the rule of law from a person who promised "complete transparency" from his administration.
We have learned that Obama's first victim under his presidential execution program is Anwar al-Awlaki, a US-born Muslim who is now in Yemen. Without showing proof of al-Awlaki's so-called executionable offenses and without a trial in a court of law, Obama has unloosed his hit squads on Awlaki. Is there anyone out there reading this who does not believe, or fear, that this programme could quickly descend into summary executions within the borders of the US?