Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 12 (12 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
Life Arts

Conservative Journalist Tod Lindberg's New Book (REVIEW ESSAY)

By       Message Thomas Farrell     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 11/7/15

Author 38575
Become a Fan
  (20 fans)
- Advertisement -

Duluth, Minnesota (OpEdNews) November 7, 2015: In the ancient world, war was a way of life. As a result, warriors and warrior/kings emerged as rather privileged people in their respective groups. In exchange for risking their lives to protect the ordinary people in their group from being killed or enslaved by conquering warriors and their warrior/king, the warriors and warrior/king in each group received a package of social benefits, including honor and political power.

The honor/shame culture of the ancient Mediterranean world continued for centuries in the medieval European world -- and elsewhere. Perhaps Falstaff's infamous speech denigrating honor can be seen as marking the waning of the centuries-old honor/shame culture in Western culture.

In any event, the Homeric epic the ILIAD involves warriors and warrior/kings such as King Agamemnon, King Achilles, and King Odysseus in the Greek alliance and King Priam and his warrior son Hector on the Trojan side.

In Robert Fagles' translation of the ILIAD (1990), the classicist Bernard Knox has supplied an introduction and notes to accompany Fagles' translation.

In the introduction (pages 1-64), Knox states what he understands to be "the stern lesson of Homer's presentation of the war: that no civilization, no matter how rich, no matter how refined, can long survive once it loses the power to meet force with equal or superior force" (page 37).

Now, when President Harry Truman dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, he used the superior force of the atomic bombs to defeat the Japanese in World War II -- instead of possibly allowing the rich and refined American civilization to fall to Japanese forces.

In the ILIAD, the Trojan civilization is presented as rich and refined -- by the standards of the times.

Moreover, Achilles is presented as an unstoppable force -- the symbolic personal equivalent of Truman's atomic bombs.

- Advertisement -

In the book THE HEROIC HEART: GREATNESS ANCIENT AND MODERN (2015), the conservative journalist Tod Lindberg repeatedly quotes from Fagles' translation of the ILIAD.

However, in his discussion of the ILIAD, Lindberg gives no indication that he grasps the full import of Knox's point that the lesson of the ILIAD is "that no civilization, no matter how rich, no matter how refined, can long survive once it loses the power to meet force with equal or superior force." However, in fairness, I should also say here that Lindberg does not completely miss the import of Knox's point, as I explain below.

Lindberg says, "Homer has achieved a near-perfect rendition of the highest heroic type of his age, a single character who brings into focus both the inner-directed greatness of that type and the moral peril such greatness poses to the legitimacy and authority of the political order" (page 54).

At first blush, Lindberg's words about how Achilles' greatness poses the moral peril "to the legitimacy and authority of the political order" may seem to be consistent with Knox's words. But are their two statements consistent with one another?

Knox does not see Achilles as "a near-perfect rendition of the highest heroic type of his age," as Lindberg does.

- Advertisement -

On the contrary, Knox sees Achilles as representing the kind of over-powering force that people in the ancient world should understandably fear.

For Knox, the ILIAD is, in effect, a cautionary tale about the kind of outside force that people in the ancient world should understandably fear.

But couldn't Lindberg argue that this is what he means by the moral peril that Achilles as "a near-perfect rendition of the highest heroic type of his age" "poses to the legitimacy and authority of the political order"?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

www.d.umn.edu/~tfarrell
Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from Saint Louis University (SLU): B.A. in English, 1966; M.A.(T) in English 1968; Ph.D.in higher education, 1974. On May 16, 1969, the editors of the SLU student newspaper named him Man of the Year, an honor customarily conferred on an administrator or a faculty member, not on a graduate student -- nor on a woman up to that time. He is the proud author of the book (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was the Indian Jesuit Anthony de Mello Murdered in the U.S. 25 Years Ago? (BOOK REVIEW)

Who Was Walter Ong, and Why Is His Thought Important Today?

More Americans Should Live Heroic Lives of Virtue (Review Essay)

Martha Nussbaum on Why Democracy Needs the Humanities (Book Review)

Hillary Clinton Urges Us to Stand Up to Extremists in the U.S.

Matthew Fox's Critique of the Roman Catholic Church