79 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 11 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

American Investment

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   9 comments
Message Peter Wedlund
The war on poverty was and never will be successful. The concept all people can have the same material things in life as everyone else is silly and suggests each person is equally productive and deserving. Take away the incentive from those who are most productive and you take away hope and reason for the most productive to be interested in producing and contributing to society. Meanwhile, allow those who exploit the productive efforts of others so they do not have to contribute significantly to society and you feed a cancerous system of greed, waste and inefficiency. How then should America best invest its resources to optimize the return on its investments?

Invest in opportunities that allow each person to be productive, particularly education. Invest in the improving the emotional health of people, by encouraging the development of their artistic and spiritual abilities. People forget there are two environments that exist in life. One is the physical environment defined by wealth that politicians so often wish to declare war on, and the other is the emotional environment that is affected by the emotional and spiritual self that politicians ignore. Even in poverty, children do well when provided a sound emotional environment. Even wealth cannot overcome an emotional environment lacking a sound foundation. Our failure to understand the relevance of these two environments (physical and emotional) and their importance to life has prevented us from making the proper investments needed to optimize our chances for enhancing opportunities that encourage the greatest returns to our society. Investing in individual opportunity allows each person the chance to reach their full potential -- it does not guarantee they will. Individual wealth should always be defined by drive and ambition, productivity and social contributions, not social or economic exploitation or prior achievements alone. Investing in these opportunities merely provides each with the tools needed to succeed. While no society should ignore its obligation to help those truly in need, neither should society encourage neediness, but rather independence.

Meanwhile, government should also invest or encourage business and academic research and productivity. The goal of any productive, vibrant society is greater productivity and efficiency as society grows. Currently, we punish success with higher taxes and we reward inefficiency and waste with tax incentives and tax cuts or rebates. Those who receive tax incentives are often those industries that never produced anything, and tax breaks are often given to those industries that are less productive and efficient. This encourages industries to believe political connections can and should be used to bolster poor managerial ability. We also fail to punish those who exploit and game the financial business sector, even providing them help when their exploitation eventually results in financial ruin. It makes far more sense to reward investments in research that at least have the potential to yield improved products, improved technology and/or improved systems that enhance our quality of life. We should not reward, but severely punish non-productive and exploitive practices in business with excessive taxes that serve as a strong disincentive to those efforts. Is it not more reasonable to support business expansion of productive and successful industries rather than to encourage this for failing industries and businesses that are unproductive and/or exploitive? The later prevents the efficient shift of resources in our economy from less productive, less efficient and exploitive businesses to more productive and more efficient industries that might replace them.

Everyone (individuals and industry) deserves a chance, but the greatest help should be provided to those who are most competent, not those who are the least competent and able. American values dictate the best should rise to the top and the worst should settle to the bottom where their abilities and effort define their relative rewards. Any system of government that discourages this from happening efficiently encourages incompetence, waste, greed and inefficiency to flourish like a cancerous growth that feeds upon our society and slowly robs it of its vitality.
Rate It | View Ratings

Peter Wedlund Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Teacher, Researcher, social activist. Political independent who believes in better government, not necessarily smaller or larger government.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Tora Bora: Deceptions, falsehoods and politics

Social Conflict and Perspective


US Congress and Middle East Conflict

Raising the dialog on Impeachment

Bunker Buster Bomb Sale to Israel

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend