I was prompted to write this article when a twitter contact of mine wondered whether some of my writings about the corpocracy amounted to a conspiracy theory. Having been a behavioral scientist most of my adult life I know a thing or two about what's theory and what's not. I don't know how anyone, scientist or lay person, could mistake the "corpocracy" for a theory. I doubt if any readers of articles published in the alternative news media would confuse the two. Nevertheless, I want to tell you what I have learned over the years.
A Tacit Conspiracy, Not a Public Wedding
I have called America's corpocracy the "devil's marriage" between big corporations and what should be but isn't the American peoples' government. The marriage was not a public wedding by any stretch of the imagination. It was more like a tacit conspiracy between the two partners, with government being the subservient to the other in every respect.
To act together toward common goals is one definition of a "conspiracy," and one of its synonyms is collusion. What are the conspirators' goals? To name a few: keeping its marriage intact; staying for a lifetime in public office; protecting corporations' fraudulent constitutional rights, not citizen rights; maintaining a hands-off policy toward corporate crime and ensuring legislation, regulations, and judicial verdicts that protect corporate interests, not the public's interests or the general welfare; keeping the government's plentiful and endless handouts to corporations; privatizing public services; controlling the mass media; keeping the marketplace free, not fair; and to expanding and protecting a profitable hegemony in other lands (corporations want global markets and politicians want global influence).
Being a conspiracy doesn't automatically mean the conspirators must operate secretly, although they obviously aren't going to publicize their conspiring. That being so, how do we know they conspire and collude among themselves? The conspiracy's goals stated earlier suggest the signs to look for as evidence. We don't have to look hard. The signs pop up daily it seems, at least when reading the alternative media, not obviously the corpocracy's mainstream media and propaganda.
Consider some signs from three of America's industries in their control of "our" government and thus of 99%.of us. The three picked are the most dangerous industries because they are often extremely injurious and deadly in the consequences of their decisions and actions.
The "Defense" Industries
The "defense" industry, bar none, is the most dangerous as it inflicts on humanity destruction and death on a world-wide scale. The industry pushed for preemptive war with Iraq before Bush Jr.'s first administration and then was heavily represented among the war policy makers in the administration. It spends billions of dollars lobbying Congress. It locates facilities in all or almost all Congressional districts to ensure servitude. It makes sure the most compliant politicians chair and sit on influential committees. It persuades Congress to authorize purchase of obsolete, unreliable, and extravagantly expensive weapons. It constantly engages in contract fraud with impunity. Ad infinitum.
Lest we forget the companion gun industry, its lobbyists have basically been assured a carte blanche by "our" government to arm Americans to the teeth with almost any form of firearm.
The Health Care Industries
These industries are a cluster of industries made up of big Pharma, the health insurance industry, and the provider industry, all conspiring with "our" government, to keep Americans in dept and in poor health needing expensive attention. The bete noir of this conglomeration is the pharmaceutical industry. Over the years it has reaped an astounding 7,000 percent return on its investment in lobbying Congress and has gotten in return for its bribery such favorable government actions as defeat of mandatory discount pricing; protection of drug patents in trade agreements; joint research patents with public institutions allowed; Medicare price negotiations with companies prevented; government list of preferred drugs prohibited; availability of generic pediatric drugs delayed; faster government drug safety reviews; company recommended reviewers allowed; bill to make generic drugs more accessible defeated; bigger hurdle before government warning letters issued; approval of some drugs just from animal testing; medical device makers get favorable considerations; unapproved uses of drugs gets journalistic license; restrictions eased on direct-to consumer advertising; tax credits given to makers of orphan drugs; licensing of new sites for making drugs eased; continuous review of approved new sites ended; pre-clinical trial data allowed for patent application; criteria for awarding patents for genes relaxed.; price control proposals dropped by government; companies allowed to pay fee for faster reviews; faster review of drugs for life-threatening diseases; distribution of drug samples allowed; easier for brand-name makers to sue generic makers; government promotes university-industry partnerships; and allowed to tap research at subsidized facilities.