Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

A Romney victory today means Democrats will be partying in 2014 and 2016

By       Message Hal Snarr     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

(Article changed on November 6, 2012 at 17:29)

If the Democrats keep control of the Senate and Romney wins today, the Democrats will likely retake the House in 2014, and 2016 will likely be a big year for Democrats running for President, Senator, or Representative.

Why do I say this?

Economic policy is currently bad and will not change, which means it will get relatively worse over time if other countries continue to adopt pro-growth policies. How do I know this? A Democrat-controlled Senate will filibuster all legislation proposed by Romney. This is not new. Democrats did it to Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II, and Republicans did it to Clinton and Obama. This is known as gridlock. Gridlock was good under Clinton because economic policy, at the time, was pretty good relative to that in other countries.

So, in the next mid-term election, I suspect the economy will be limping along. Democrats will likely benefit from a bad 2014 economy by winning control of both houses because the President is blamed for economic malaise. This was the case in 2008. Although Democrats controlled the House and Senate in 2007 and 2008, many voters actually thought both Houses of Congress were controlled by Republicans because Bush was president. This means Romney will have no chance of getting anything through Congress between 2014 and a reelection bid in 2016.

So, if Romney wins tonight, there is NO reason to riot in the streets. Democrats will thwart everything he'll propose even though Romney has touted his ability to work across the aisle. The US Senate is not the Massachusetts legislature. The federal government can print money; Massachusetts cannot. Thus, there is no incentive for Senate Democrats to work with Romney.  Thus, I foresee no end to trillion-dollar budget deficits, but unemployment will subside as people stop looking for work.

Although I have no horse in this race (I voted for Gary Johnson), I think Mr. Romney is a nice guy--too nice for politics. I do not see him using the bully pulpit to demonize Senate Democrats into supporting his policy proposals. Instead, I see the Democrats being able to use the media to pull him to their side. The Romney presidency will be as if a Democrat were in office, which will result in him being a one-term president.


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Hal W. Snarr, his wife, and son live beyond the clutches of the city.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The October (Jobs report) Surprise. If it looks like a lie, and quacks like a lie, it must be a lie.

A Romney victory today means Democrats will be partying in 2014 and 2016

Causes of and solutions for one heck of a financial Molotov cocktail