Copyrighted Image? DMCA | In Citizens United, the Supreme Court ruled that the only justification for limiting campaign expenditures was "corruption or the appearance of corruption." And since independent expenditures, including those from corporations and unions, don't have any kind of corrupting influence, there's no justification for limiting them. Really? That's ridiculous. How can the court just unilaterally declare that unlimited money doesn't lead to corruption? |
Read the rest of the story HERE:
At motherjones.com
At motherjones.com
