Most Popular Choices
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have visited this page? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
border_none.jpg



SHARE More Sharing

Hugh Campbell

Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

                 

Volunteer a little time and make a big difference

I have 3 fans:
Become a Fan
Become a Fan.
You'll get emails whenever I post articles on OpEdNews

A seasoned financial professional, currently providing subject matter expertise on a variety of regulatory topics, including the Dodd-Frank Act, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and overall compliance monitoring. He has previously held positions as Chief Risk Officer (CRO), Chief Audit Executive (CAE) and Director of Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) Compliance, is a son of a Philadelphia, Pa. Steelworker and very concerned citizen with regards to the fate of our Republic.

OpEdNews Member for 865 week(s) and 4 day(s)

13 Articles, 237 Quick Links, 292 Comments, 0 Diaries, 1 Polls

1 Polls

(17 comments)        Tuesday, November 19, 2013
Do you believe 5 -4 Supreme Court decisions are more likely based on political views of the Justices than on legal   SHARE More Sharing A 2012 CBS/NYT poll asked: In general, do you think the current US Supreme Court Justices decide their cases based on legal analysis without regard to their own personal or political views, or do you think they sometimes let their own personal or political views influence their decisions? Do you believe post 1999 US Supreme Court 5 to 4 decisions are more likely based on political views of the Justices than on legal analysis?

Tell A Friend