Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 5 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Big Oil vs. "An Inconvenient Truth"?

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   2 comments
Message the web
The National Science Teacher's Association (NSTA) took umbrage at Laurie David's characterization of them as kissing big oil's ass. Following, their response:
NSTA Statement on Nov. 26 Washington Post Op-ed "Science ├ la Joe Camel"
Nov. 28, 2006

On November 26, the Washington Post printed an opinion piece from
environmental activist Laurie David, a producer of the film "An
Inconvenient Truth." In her op-ed Ms. David reports that NSTA rejected
the opportunity to distribute 50,000 copies of the DVD to NSTA members.

During conversations with Ms. David's representative we suggested
making the DVD available via alternative means of distribution (e.g.
by providing a mailing list of our members to producers, announcing
its availability in our publications, etc.). It appears that these
alternative distribution mechanisms were unsatisfactory.

It was not the intent of the NSTA to restrict "An Inconvenient Truth"
from its members and we are currently pursuing options to make the DVD
available to teachers.

In the op-ed Ms. David goes on to characterize NSTA as a willing
corporate America partner that eagerly pushes corporate messages about
the environment.

This is not true.

The perception created by the op-ed that NSTA has a conflict of
interest in dealing with corporate America is misleading. This is a
very serious issue to NSTA and science education. Like many
organizations, NSTA does receive support from corporate America and
other organizations (in FY06 total corporate support received by NSTA
was 16.4% and total support from energy companies was 3.77%). Before
we accept any funds from outside groups (corporate or otherwise), and

as a condition of any support, we make it clear that NSTA is solely
responsible for developing, directing, and implementing the programs
we offer to teachers.

Let me specifically address the programs outlined in the op-ed:
ExxonMobil has been a long-time sponsor of the national network we
call Building a Presence for Science. In this project we have
identified a "point of contact" for science in over 40,000 school
buildings. Originally conceived to provide a copy of the National
Science Education Standards to each school, NSTA now regularly sends
these points of contact useful information on science education that
they share with teachers in their buildings. Not once has ExxonMobil
asked to use this network for their own purposes.

The Shell Oil Company funds national research science experts to
present at our national conference, where they speak directly to
science teachers about their field of research. NSTA chooses the
scientists, invites the scientists, and hosts the scientists at these
conferences. In addition, the Shell Oil Company sponsors the Shell
Science Teaching award for K-12 science teachers who have had a
positive impact on their students, school, and community through
exemplary classroom teaching. This award program is administered by
NSTA and the recipients are chosen by science teachers selected by NSTA.

The partnership with API, which ended 5 years ago, led to the creation
of a simulation, done entirely by NSTA, on energy usage. The video in
question, "You Can't Be Cool Without Fuel" was not on our website.

Global warming is a very important science/societal issue. NSTA has
always supported sound environmental science education. We regret this
current controversy surrounding our decision not to mass distribute
the DVD to our members, and we are working to promote the availability
of the film.

In response to an October 2005 report titled Rising Above the
Gathering Storm, a strong consensus is emerging in the business,
education, and scientific communities that our nation's future
competitiveness in the global marketplace is directly tied to the
ability of our schools to better prepare children in mathematics and
the sciences. We should be discussing positive ways of how we can work
together to strengthen the science education we provide to our
nation's students.

The mission of the NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in
science teaching and learning for all, and for over 50 years NSTA has
been a staunch supporter of quality science education. We are very
proud of the work we do on behalf of science education.

Dr. Gerald Wheeler
Executive Director
National Science Teachers Association
Rate It | View Ratings

The Web Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

anonymously sourced from either the web or a forwarded email.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Jim Cramer Uses CNBC to Manipulate Stocks

Video: Is Bristol Palin Baby Trig's Mother? Evidence & Pictures

BabyGate: Explosive New Details and the Smoking Gun Photo

Romney's Storm Tips

Feeding The Homeless BANNED In Major Cities All Over America

Most Massive Natural Disaster in US History-- and you don't know what caused it.

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend