Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   2 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Big Oil vs. "An Inconvenient Truth"?

By       Message the web     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

The National Science Teacher's Association (NSTA) took umbrage at Laurie David's characterization of them as kissing big oil's ass. Following, their response:



http://www.nsta.org/pressroom&news_story_ID=52977
NSTA Statement on Nov. 26 Washington Post Op-ed "Science à la Joe Camel"
Nov. 28, 2006

On November 26, the Washington Post printed an opinion piece from
environmental activist Laurie David, a producer of the film "An
Inconvenient Truth." In her op-ed Ms. David reports that NSTA rejected
the opportunity to distribute 50,000 copies of the DVD to NSTA members.

During conversations with Ms. David's representative we suggested
making the DVD available via alternative means of distribution (e.g.
by providing a mailing list of our members to producers, announcing
its availability in our publications, etc.). It appears that these
alternative distribution mechanisms were unsatisfactory.

It was not the intent of the NSTA to restrict "An Inconvenient Truth"
from its members and we are currently pursuing options to make the DVD
available to teachers.

In the op-ed Ms. David goes on to characterize NSTA as a willing
corporate America partner that eagerly pushes corporate messages about
the environment.

This is not true.

The perception created by the op-ed that NSTA has a conflict of
interest in dealing with corporate America is misleading. This is a
very serious issue to NSTA and science education. Like many
organizations, NSTA does receive support from corporate America and
other organizations (in FY06 total corporate support received by NSTA
was 16.4% and total support from energy companies was 3.77%). Before
we accept any funds from outside groups (corporate or otherwise), and

as a condition of any support, we make it clear that NSTA is solely
responsible for developing, directing, and implementing the programs
we offer to teachers.

Let me specifically address the programs outlined in the op-ed:
ExxonMobil has been a long-time sponsor of the national network we
call Building a Presence for Science. In this project we have
identified a "point of contact" for science in over 40,000 school
buildings. Originally conceived to provide a copy of the National
Science Education Standards to each school, NSTA now regularly sends
these points of contact useful information on science education that
they share with teachers in their buildings. Not once has ExxonMobil
asked to use this network for their own purposes.

The Shell Oil Company funds national research science experts to
present at our national conference, where they speak directly to
science teachers about their field of research. NSTA chooses the
scientists, invites the scientists, and hosts the scientists at these
conferences. In addition, the Shell Oil Company sponsors the Shell
Science Teaching award for K-12 science teachers who have had a
positive impact on their students, school, and community through
exemplary classroom teaching. This award program is administered by
NSTA and the recipients are chosen by science teachers selected by NSTA.

The partnership with API, which ended 5 years ago, led to the creation
of a simulation, done entirely by NSTA, on energy usage. The video in
question, "You Can't Be Cool Without Fuel" was not on our website.

Global warming is a very important science/societal issue. NSTA has
always supported sound environmental science education. We regret this
current controversy surrounding our decision not to mass distribute
the DVD to our members, and we are working to promote the availability
of the film.

In response to an October 2005 report titled Rising Above the
Gathering Storm, a strong consensus is emerging in the business,
education, and scientific communities that our nation's future
competitiveness in the global marketplace is directly tied to the
ability of our schools to better prepare children in mathematics and
the sciences. We should be discussing positive ways of how we can work
together to strengthen the science education we provide to our
nation's students.

The mission of the NSTA is to promote excellence and innovation in
science teaching and learning for all, and for over 50 years NSTA has
been a staunch supporter of quality science education. We are very
proud of the work we do on behalf of science education.

Dr. Gerald Wheeler
Executive Director
National Science Teachers Association

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

anonymously sourced from either the web or a forwarded email.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Jim Cramer Uses CNBC to Manipulate Stocks

Video: Is Bristol Palin Baby Trig's Mother? Evidence & Pictures

BabyGate: Explosive New Details and the Smoking Gun Photo

Romney's Storm Tips

Feeding The Homeless BANNED In Major Cities All Over America

Most Massive Natural Disaster in US History-- and you don't know what caused it.