I've lately been advised by a friend that I am beginning to sound like Chicken Little, because I've been talking and writing a lot about this piece of federal election reform legislation called the Holt Bill, or HR811.
I've been told to ease up on the doom and gloom scenarios associated with the bill. I admire and respect this person and take his advice to heart.
But I told him that maybe instead of saying, "Oh, that Nancy. What a lunatic. She's on a crusade. She just won't shut up" he might not only take notice of the sky falling, but take some action by calling our NH Congressional delegation and tell them to cease and desist from giving their support to HR811.
Let me spell it out as best I can, in the simplest of terms.
I won't go into its enacting secret vote counting into federal law. Perhaps federalizing secret vote counting in the United States of America does not concern everyone too much.
I won't mention that the bill won't create meaningful change for the nation's 2008 elections, because it's been corrupted into a corporate dream, leaving our 2008 elections even more vulnerable to wholesale fraud and destabilization.
Let me just tell you the costs of HR811 - the Holt Bill - to New Hampshire. Maybe this will spur you to pick up the phone and call your representative.
Rumor has it that the House is planning to bring this ghastly bill to a vote the week of July 9th.
NH Representative Hodes has disregarded recommendations to oppose the bill from every corner of the Granite State: from NH Secretary Bill Gardner, the Fair Elections Committee, and the NH Association of City and Town Clerks. Hodes continues to be a cosponsor of HR811.
NH Representative Shea Porter, although seriously engaged on a very high level in this debate, has still not taken a position on it.
THE COSTS OF HR811 TO NEW HAMPSHIRE
Conservative estimates for the financial costs of HR811 to NH alone run as high as $3 million each year for the next 20 years. These costs will be borne by the property tax payers of this state because HR811 is vastly under funded.
In fact, nobody in Congress has even attempted to scope out the real financial costs to the states.
And because it is positioned as a civil rights bill, Congress has no accountability under the unfunded mandate law.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).