Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Broder the Banal

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   1 comment
Author 55
Message Michael Leon
- Advertisement -

David Broder continues his "exhibited loyalty" (to borrow a term from the Bush regime) to the GOP in a pair of columns in the Post this week, having long ago jettisoned honest journalism. 

The Post columnist, hailed as the “Dean of the Washington Press Corp,” has a column today dismantled by Greg Sargent in Talking Points Memo. 

Sargent notes Broder rushing in to defend the Republicans by knocking down a story in yesterday’s Times “that questions the political health of the GOP.” 

The problem is that Broder in his analysis of the Times piece omits crucial point after point from the text, the inclusion of which would render Broder’s column utterly vacuous. 

- Advertisement -

“Broder was so eager to attack the Times for besmirching the honor of the GOP that he snip-snip-snipped those inconvenient facts away,” writes Sargent. But that’s par for Broder.

In Monday’s column, The Fading Freedom Mission, Broder mourns that: “To be blunt, the Bush prescription for American foreign policy -- an aggressive effort to expand freedom and democracy around the globe -- has lost its credibility.” 

Gee, why would that be? 

- Advertisement -

You might think that Broder’s assertion that Bush’s foreign policy is as “an aggressive effort to expand freedom and democracy around the globe” might at least merit stating some factual basis, maybe a passing reference to an academic freedom index measuring civil freedoms brought about by Bush’s freedom mission, or perhaps a noting of the new civil liberties now enjoyed by people living in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, for example. (Wonderful places to live, if you like to criticize the government and current social arrangementsJ.) 

But no, there is no reference to human rights groups’ praise, or civil libertarians extolling the virtues of Bush. 

For factual support of his contention of the existence of a Bushian “effort to expand freedom and democracy,” Broder offers one fact: that Bush himself said so in the second inaugural address, so, obviously, it must be true, though as the piece notes, lots of Americans don’t believe much that Bush says these days. 

Yep, Bush did say so, over and over again. And this week we were reminded of this, thanks to the piercing insight and the typically Herculean journalistic efforts of David Broder.

###

 

- Advertisement -

Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Leon Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Michael Leon is a writer living in Madison, Wisconsin. His writing has appeared nationally in The Progressive, In These Times, and CounterPunch. He can be reached at maleon64@yahoo.com.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Hector Jordan - Trail-blazing Hispanic Hero

Oliver Stone's Vital World Trade Center

Ray Nitschke and Bush's Iraq-Vietnam Speech

VA Document Contradicts US Atty in Jailed Vet Case

Gov. Tommy Thompson Is No Moderate on Iraq

Rutgers Basketball-Politically Correct and Apolitical