Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

The Dems Have Only Themselves to Blame (But We Have to Suffer the Consequences)

By       Message Lynne Glasner       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   No comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 90
- Advertisement -

 

The cloud hanging over the Democratic heads of state contains the implicit threat from Sen. Joe Lieberman to leave the party. So leave, we say casually. Good riddance.

 

Not so fast. If Lieberman officially crosses the aisle, the Democrats stand to lose not just their party majority. In essence, it would mean that all the committee chairs now in the hands of ranking majority members, i.e., Democrats, can go right back to their predecessors. The chairmanship is the enabling power that allows the Senate to open investigations and hold the hearings we’re starting to see on Capitol Hill. That includes subpoena power – a force to reckon with.

- Advertisement -

 

A Lieberman defection means that investigations now in the works in the Senate will never see the light of day. And the more investigations, even if impeachment is off the table, the less power Bush has and the more Republicans will cut and run. That’s the Democratic strategy we see in place now. Should grounds for impeachment be embedded in any of the upcoming hearings, then the Democrats will get bipartisan support; it will be too obvious for even the Party regulars to ignore.

The sad part is that the Democrats wouldn’t be in such a tenuous position were it not for their former pal in Connecticut. The Democratic Party ought to be confessing to their supporters, with a red face, that “mistakes were made.” It’s hard to see how the Democrats didn’t see it coming.

- Advertisement -

 

When offering himself as a Democratic Party presidential candidate, running in the primaries in ‘03, Lieberman said: “I'm running for President because I love America - and hate the direction George W. Bush is taking us. … I'm an independent-minded Democrat, and I'm running for President to restore security and prosperity to America and integrity and fairness to the White House.”
[
Quoted by Project Vote Smart: http://www.vote-smart.org/npat.php?old=true&can_id=S0141103&npatform_id=326#Result] Square that with his current support for Bush policy in Iraq (and by default the Middle East, which is where his interests lie). When most people talk about the “direction of the country” they are referring to foreign policy and the Iraq War in particular. Not so with Joe, apparently. He has been lockstep with this Administration, waving the flag with the Iraq invasion and voting against the recent nonbinding resolution that expressed opposition to the policy.

Lieberman is independent all right. As soon as he lost the primary, he rushed out and formed his own “independent” Party. It was obvious that Lieberman, like his fellow Republicans, is a sore loser. He knew what he was doing and where the power was stored; it was his own security Lieberman wanted secured. Lieberman has been W’s greatest supporter ever since, giving credence to the canard that the Republicans are interested in bipartisanship and are willing to cross the aisle. It looks like Lieberman has become the frog prince.

 

When Ned Lamont won the Democratic primary, the Democrats were careful not to go all out and support Lieberman, but they didn’t support Lamont as their Party’s candidate either. That Lieberman had to form his own Party in order to hold on to his seat says a lot, but more telling was that the Democrats refused to throw their weight behind the people’s candidate of choice. Most Democrats stayed out of it completely, preferring the safety of silence, guaranteeing Lamont’s loss in the process. In effect, Lamont got zero in real support from his own Party.

- Advertisement -

 

The Democrats’ tepid request to Lieberman to bow out was treated like a lose IED after he quickly maneuvered to run on his own. The Democrats could have filed suit to contest Lieberman’s third party, but didn’t. They had to abide by the election outcome, so what did they do? The Party accused of cutting and running, cut and ran from candidate Lamont. While feigning support, they withheld funding and then blamed Lamont for losing. It was politics and finesse at its best and serves to show why the Democrats are having trouble getting traction for a singular message. They split their party, abandoned the little guy even when the people voted for him, and then expected everyone to stay in line. That happens in Republican circles, but not so fast in the Democratic lane. Oh, and in case no one noticed, Lieberman lists himself as an Independent/Democrat; his “Connecticut for Lieberman” Party was abandoned after the election. His dual party listing indicates he can go whatever way the wind blows—and he will.

 

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Lynne Glasner is a freelance writer/editor based in New York City. She has edited numerous books, fiction and nonfiction, many on political subjects. Her essays have appeared in Commondreams, MediaChannel.org, and Huffington Post as well as OpEd (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Crime and Punishment: Scholars Weigh In on the Bush Legacy

Book Review: Conservatives Without Conscience, by John W. Dean

Book Review: Unacceptable: The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina

The State of the Union Is Frozen

Luck and the Trifecta of Politics

Going Rogue in the Military: The McChrystal Strategy and Original Intent