Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 3 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Gun Control: Does the Debate Ever End?

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   7 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 8096
Message LINDSAY MILLER

A machine gun. What is the practicality in owning a machine gun? The better question is: why do I need a practical reason to own a machine gun? A machine gun is dangerous, but a car is dangerous. If I collect firearms, can the government prevent me from owning one? Should the government limit what I can or cannot own? Most profoundly, the answer is no as reiterated through the Constitution and James Madison.   

            The Fourteenth Amendment clearly states that no man shall "... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation." What is property? James Madison stated in The Founder's Constitution, Chapter 16, Document 23, that "a man's land, or merchandize, or money is called his property." In these concise lines, a founding father defines what property is. Would not a firearm fall under these definitions? A man's merchandize means whatever a person buys legally. Buying a firearm on the black market, that should be illegal, but illegalizing all weaponry should not. As long as I proceed to buy an object through the proper implications, there is no reason why I should not be able to buy whatever I would like. If I can buy a car, why could I not buy a machine gun? Both implements have the possibility of killing many people, and both implements are licensed when owned.

            Also, the Second Amendment states that the people have the right to keep and bear arms. This clearly indicates that the people may own guns during a time of war but also keep guns after a time of war. During the Revolution, militia was synonymous with the people and thus that etymology should be continued, even in our day and age.

            So, do I need a machine gun? No. Do I want a machine gun? No. However, the point is, I want the possibility of owning a machine gun and to keep it that way. Government involvement in the people's lives should be strictly limited to the bare minimum in all aspects of the law.

 

Rate It | View Ratings

LINDSAY MILLER Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I am an American student.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Gun Control: Does the Debate Ever End?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: