Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

We Can't Get Out of Iraq until Bush is out of office, So there Can't Be a Precipitous Withdrawal

By       Message Leon Bloom       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   1 comment

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 10676
- Advertisement -

After viewing the testimony of General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker these past few days, it has become obvious that our troops will remain in Iraq at least as long as George W. Bush remains in office. This is true, even if Congress chooses not to fund the war, something they will never do. Therefore, any discussion of a precipitous withdrawal is meaningless.

The oft stated fear of a premature withdrawal is that Iraq will become a failed state, thus  allowing al-Qaeda to set up a base in which they could train terrorists and plan attacks on the United States. A second fear is that Iran will then exert undue influence over Iraq, to our detriment. These situations occurring at the same time are unlikely for several reasons. As demonstrated in Anbar Province, when the Iraqis revolted against al-Qaeda domination, the Iraqis would not allow al-Qaeda to establish themselves in their country. As to Iranian influence, that will always be there as long as there is a Shiite government exists in Iraq.

But al-Qaeda doesn’t need Iraq for a base to train and plan attacks against the United States. We shouldn’t forget that the attacks on 9/11 were originally conceived in Indonesia, the detailed plans were worked out in Germany, and the pilots were trained in the United States.

On the contrary, our presence in Iraq is exactly what Osama bin Laden was hoping would happen when the 9/11 attacks were as devastating as they were. He had finally come up with an attack that got us to commit troops, in large numbers, to the Middle East. While our invasion of Afghanistan was more successful than he had anticipated, when we then invaded Iraq, he couldn’t have been happier.

- Advertisement -

That is why al-Qaeda insists that Iraq is the central front of their plan. Having learned the lesson of what happened to the Soviet Union when they became mired in Afghanistan, he plans to keep us in Iraq until we have exhausted our funds and our troops.  His plan is working. Bin Laden remains safely ensconced in his caves on the border of Afghanistan and Pakistan, while we don’t have the wherewithal to root him out. Meanwhile, he is killing and maiming Americans at a pretty good rate and exhausting our Armed Forces. The high price of oil is helping to bankrupt us while filling the coffers of his friends in Saudi Arabia who supply him with funds.

We are not safer as long as we remain in Iraq. On the contrary, we are in danger of becoming a failed state.

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

I am an 80 year old retired designer and developer of computers and computer systems. I started in the field when when internal memories were on drums, moved to magnetic cores and eventually to chips. I'm a co-holder of patents on a version of cache (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Understanding the Constitution: Prerequisite to being President.

John McCain's qualifications to be President?

Experience -- Obama vs. Palin

Barack Obama's First 5 Months in Office

Try this jobs program