The Tennessee Republican claims he wasnt privy to any inside information leading up to the sale of his stock in Hospital Corporation of America (HCA), the countrys largest for-profit hospital chain founded by Frists father, Thomas, and brother, Thomas Jr., weeks before the company reported lower than expected earnings July 13 that sent the stock south.
Now the Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating the matter, a spokesman for the senator said last week, to determine if Frist broke any laws.
Frists press secretary told the Washington Post last week that Frist decided to sell his stock to eliminate any appearance of a conflict-of-interest due to his work in the senate in shaping the nations healthcare policies. So, the senators spokesman said, Frist drafted a letter to Northern Trust and Equitable Trust in Nashville June 13 advising them to sell all of his stock in HCA, as well as his wife and childrens investments in the company.
Still, the improprieties have been in the making for quite some time. According to an Associated Press report Saturday, Frist received regular updates of transfers of assets to his blind trusts and sales of assets. He also was able to initiate a stock sale of a hospital chain founded by his family with perfect timing. Shortly after the sale this summer, the stock price dived.
The mainstream media, quick to accept Frists statements that hes been in the dark about his HCA holdings, was complicit in allowing the obvious conflict of having a senator who makes national decisions on healthcare that directly benefit the senators fortunes and that of his family, fall off the radar screen.
Indeed, in Jan. 26, 2003, story titled Frists Health Care Votes Reflect Roots, Frist told the Post that he no longer knows how much the (HCA) stock is worth.
But letters sent to Frist by Kirk Scobey Jr., his trustee, and documents filed with the senate contradict the Frists statement.
Interestingly, Frist knew of these sales, or at least had access to information that these sales took place, reported the Nashville Scene, in an investigative story in July 2003 into Frists so-called blind trust. How? The income from these sales of HCA stock was reported on Frist's annual financial disclosure statements that he filed with the Secretary of the Senate.
"Given the annual reporting of capital gains, it's kind of a crock for Frist to say he doesn't know what he owns because it's in a blind trust," Charlie Gofen, a portfolio manager at Gofen and Glossberg, a Chicago-based investment-counseling firm, told the paper at the time.
Frists office provided the Scene with supporting documents into the senators blind trust. The paper hired an eight-member, bipartisan, unpaid panel of experts in trusts from around the country to analyze it and what the panel discovered was that Frists blind trust "blind" trust isn't really blind at all.
Frists ownership of HCA stock isn't considered a conflict of interest according to Senate rules, the paper reported. But then, according to those rules, almost nothing qualifies as a conflict of interest.
Frist created his blind trust in accordance with the rules of the Ethics in Government Act. That law states that a "qualified blind trust" must meet certain requirements:
* The trustee, who is the individual charged with managing the assets of the trust, must be independent.
* There can be no restrictions on disposing of the trust's assets.
* Communication between the trustee and the politician must be limited.
* And the trust must be approved by the Senate's Ethics Committee.
In 1995, with his holdings in HCA and the senators increasing role in shaping the nations healthcare policies coming under intense scrutiny, Frist first put his assets into a blind trust. Five years later, in December 2000, Frist put his assets into a newer blind trust, prompting the Nashville Scene to ask Why the new trust?
At the time he created his first trust, Frists portfolio included so-called "non-public securities," the paper reported. More than likely, these were private partnerships and the like. Federal laws say such securities cannot be put into a so-called "qualified blind trust"the type of high-end trust that Frist now has. Once these securities were sold the "more stringent" form of trust was created "as soon as practical."
Experts interviewed by the paper said what was likely the key selling point for Frist when he created the new trust in December 2000 was that he given the opportunity to look at his specific financial holdings, including HCA.
Whenever one blind trust is discarded in favor of a newer one, panelists say the blind trust ceases to be blind during the changeover period, the paper reported.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).