June 26, 2006
This week in Israel..... behind the news with Gershon Baskin
We are linked together
It is true that from the Palestinian perspective there is no shortage of reasons, in the past weeks, to feel the need to take revenge against Israel, however; in the backdrop of the internal Palestinian national dialogue, there was at least an attempt to rebuild consensus for the continuation of the tahdiya. It seems that the Hamas leadership, at least that part of the leadership represented by Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh was not interested in the attack. He probably had no early information about the attack, but his hands are also tied in terms of his ability to prevent it and probably very limited in his ability to bring about the release of Gilead Shalit the kidnapped soldier. A few short hours after Ismail Haniyeh had called for putting an end to the shooting of Qassam rockets into Israel, Sami Abu Zuhri, the Hamas spokesman representing Khaled Mashal, denied that there had been an agreement to stop the Qassams and called for Palestinian fighters to continue their actions. Haniyeh's position is severely compromised by the attack, perhaps one of the reasons why it took place at this time.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas is becoming increasingly irrelevant as well from an internal Palestinian point of view. He was ridiculed by the Palestinian public twice this week once for hugging Ehud Olmert at the Petra summit last week while Israel was continuing the daily so-called targeted killings in Gaza and a second time after Israel's announcements regarding the transferring of Jordanian supplied weapons to Abass' Presidential Guards in order to strengthen Abass was also ridiculed. Who is he supposed to use those arms against, Palestinians asked?
Israelis are all asking who is in charge in Palestine and the answer seems to be no one. Calls in Israel are on the rise for a deep and intensive military action in Gaza including the killing of Hamas leaders the Prime Minister being the first target. Many Israelis expected that following the 100% withdrawal of Israel from Gaza that the Palestinian desire to hit Israel from Gaza would diminish. Palestinians respond to this that the occupation has not finished, not in Gaza and not in the West Bank, and that the struggle for freedom and liberation must continue until all of the West Bank and Gaza are free. The attempts of some of the more moderate parties participating in the Palestinian national dialogue to limit Palestinian attacks against Israel within the West Bank have apparently failed. Yesterday's attack was a clear message to Fateh forces that they have no control and no ability to prevent other factions from acting independently.
The current situation in Palestine did not develop suddenly out of nowhere. The chaos and lack of the ability of a central authority to govern is a result of the political-security developments and negative interactions between the Palestinians and Israelis over years. Palestinians have a lot of responsibility for their own situation, but Israel too holds a great deal of responsibility. Now that Israel has come to the decision that it does not wish to rule over the Palestinians, we are faced with the dilemma of to who we can turn over the authority for governing the territories. The coming escalation will not resolve that issue, it will only make it more complicated and will leave Israel in a situation where there will be no one to turn the authority over to. Even if Israel wants to leave most of the West Bank, it seems that it will be almost impossible to do so.
Calls for ceasefire equated to treason
Two weeks ago I wrote a piece for Ynet in Hebrew calling for a bilateral ceasefire. Ynet asked me for the text in English and it was immediately published on their English page (http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,l-3263177,00.html). The Hebrew edition of Ynet held the piece until 5:00 pm yesterday after the attack in Kerem Shalom. Within 12 hours there were more than 120 talkbacks. At least 117 of them were extreme attacks against me and my opinions. Israel is traumatized by kidnappings and the responses of ordinary people against me is understandable given the political culture and psyche of this nation. Almost all of the attacks against me called for wiping out whole sections of Gaza, bombing them, making them pay a high price. Aside from the personal attacks against me and my integrity (I was likened to Jews who called for collaboration with the Nazis), the only plans that these concerned citizens had to offer contained calls for Palestinian blood in the name of Jewish and Israeli pride and honor.
I am convinced that the only way of preventing a new tragic situation for both people is to find someway of reaching a bilateral ceasefire. My interest in is saving human lives, from both sides. I don't know if a bilateral ceasefire could work or could last. I have serious doubts of whether the Palestinian leadership of Hamas and Fateh together, could impose their will on other factions. I have serious doubts if Israel would agree to cease its targeted killings policies or the massive arrests of Palestinian suspects in the West Bank for even a limited time period. What I do know is that everyday that Israelis and Palestinians are not firing at each other, is another day when people are not being killed. Simplistic perhaps but the equation itself is rather simplistic. If there is a workable ceasefire for one day then perhaps it could be extended for another. After one week, another week, etc.
The attacks against me do have their toll. I am depressed by them, mostly by the sense of standing alone (or in a very small crowd of like-minded Israelis) who believe that violence will not lead us to safety.
No negotiations with terrorists
With the kidnapping of the Israeli soldier is likely to come the demands to release Palestinian prisoners in Israel. Israel says that it will never negotiate with the Hamas and will never release prisoners to free a kidnapped soldier, but it has continually done that in the past. Israel is trying to use intelligence sources to find the hiding place of the kidnapped soldier and then to free him with a special ops missions. The last time a similar case happened was with Nahshon Wachsman when Israel was in full control of the West Bank and that rescue attempts led to the death of Wachsman and to one of his rescuers. Israel must pursue all means to release the soldier, including the possibility of special operations. But if negotiations will take place with a third party involved, most likely Egypt, it would be wise to expand the scope of the negotiations to include the bilateral ceasefire which could then also be linked to a prisoner release. It would be much better to release prisoners as a result of a ceasefire agreement than as a result of a kidnapping.