Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 9 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Boycotts versus Middle East peace

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   11 comments
Message Ami Isseroff

The Israel boycott resolution of the British UCU academic union, and the announcement by the larger UNISON federation that it too is considering a boycott, follow similar resolutions by a UK journalists' union (NUJ) and an Irish artists group. These resolutions are not the product of legitimate concern over the sometimes heartbreaking aspects of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank. Nor are they stepping stones on the way to peaceful resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Rather, they are the fruit of a long campaign to delegitimize Israel, aimed at blocking any peaceful settlement.

Though some academics are outraged by the UCU boycott resolution">academics are outraged by the UCU boycott resolution, the anti-Israel boycotters have acted cleverly. Like a virus, or aliens from extra-galactic space, they have taken over the leadership of the UCU, and their resolution states essentially that they can use union funding and facilities to push their cause. It is a brilliant implementation of a classic Bolshevik strategy.

The UCU resolution stipulates that the union will "circulate a motion to all its branches to discuss calls from Palestinian trade unions for a "comprehensive and consistent international boycott of all Israeli academic institutions." The motion is going to branches for "their information and discussion." The resolution is one sided of course, as it will not discuss calls for boycotting trade unions controlled by terror groups, Arab Palestinian trade unions that support terrorism or anyone else. Only Israel is on the agenda, and only one course of action is on the agenda.

The UCU resolution allows boycott leaders to use union facilities to brainwash membership. It gives them a way to generate sentiment for delegitimization of Israel and legitimze the idea of destroying a member state of the UN, even if they can never get enough votes for an actual boycott. The discussion will engender an atmosphere that precludes objective analysis and free discussion of the issues in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in British academia. Anyone who voices any objection to the boycott will be branded a reactionary.

The boycotts are not intended to bring about peace between Israelis and the Arabs of Palestine. Rather, the initiators of boycotts in the UK, Sue Blackwell being among the most prominent of them, make no attempt to hide the fact that they consider Israel to be an illegitimate state, and that they deny the right of self-determination to the Jewish people.

Ostensibly, the boycott initiatives are responses to the request of Palestinian trade unions, but this is a convenient fiction. Boycotts of Israel, called "anti-normalization," have been endemic to Arab world trade unions for many years, in particular, Jordanian and Egyptian trade unions have used these boycotts to sabotage their countries' peace agreements with Israel, and to terrorize journalists and academicians into breaking off any contact with Israelis. This activity began long before the current crisis and has nothing to do with the occupation.

The Palestine General Federation of Trade Unions, which requests the UK anti-Israel boycotts, is a peculiar labor organization. It doesn't have many workers among its members, and its only activity seems to be promoting boycotts of Israel. Aided by British anti-Zionist activists, this organization has now succeeded in exporting their racist campaign to other countries.

Opponents of academic boycotts must make themselves heard at all such union meetings, and must ensure that meetings are not engineered to only allow a one-sided message. They should bring a proactive program to those meetings, of the type that was used to successfully change a similar one-sided divestment resolution of the Presbyterian Church USA, and should probably consult the organizers of that campaign. The basic question that UCU and other union members should be asking themselves is whether they are for dialogue and reconciliation in the Middle East, and whether or not boycotts and anti-normalization campaigns will support these goals.

Some key points of the discussions should be:

Rate It | View Ratings

Ami Isseroff Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Ami Isseroff, D.Sc, is a Middle East analyst and director of MidEastWeb for Coexistence and Webmaster of, Middle East - by MidEastWeb. He also edits and co-edits other Web sites and Web logs including Zionism & Israel,  ZioNation, (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend