Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
Sci Tech

New Media Technology

By       Message Horace J. Digby     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 1322
By Horace J. Digby -- SandBagger News Team

Most newspapers promptly print corrections in their next issue. These corrections are usually in a column called "Errata." Fortunately for our readers, SandBagger Mag-e-zine has never stooped to this cheap journalistic practice.

"It's irritating to read an article and then find a bunch of corrections in the next issue-you never know when you're finished reading," said SandBagger attorney Tim South.

Errors are part of the newspaper game. In fact, at SandBagger Mag-e-zine we take pride in making them. But we never print corrections. Readers hate being told the news they read yesterday didn't really happen. Besides, it's hard enough to understand our articles the first time without sorting through a bunch of corrections in the next issue.
That's why, at SandBagger Mag-e-zine, we don't waste time correcting errors. We're too busy making new ones. Besides, making corrections would mean we'd actually have to read this stuff.

But for readers like Tim South, The SandBagger Institute for Advanced Human Research and Bowling Team has developed new proprietary media technology called, "Pre-Errata."

Pre-Errata allows corrections to be printed in the same issue where the mistakes occur.

Not impressed? How about this? Pre-Errata allows corrections to be printed even before mistakes are made.

A demonstration is in order. Our next paragraph includes corrections for a following article which has not yet been written:

Pre-Errata: At line 7, "did not," should be replaced with "did." At line 11, "Barry Morrill," should be replaced with "an unidentified individual." At line 19, "said," should be replaced with . . . well, no. That one is right. It should say "said." Also at line 19, the period should be a question mark.

[Editor's Note: Due to an unexpected typesetter's error, the errors
corrected above will not appear in this issue after all.]


-- Horace J. Digby --
http://www.lexingtonflim.com

Copyright © 2006 Lexington Film, LLC. All rights reserved

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

http://www.lexingtonfilm.com
Whether it's mishaps with a French-for-Travelers CD, or a media technology that corrects errors before they occur, Horace J. Digby never even sees the mark.

Winner of the Robert Benchley Society Award for Humor; selected to judge the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Dave Bary Judges Top Ten Robert Benchley Society Humor Finalists

Someone to Watch Over Me

Spelling - The New Democracy

What I Do About Writers Block

New Media Technology