Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Will Minnesota Be Next To Succumb To The Lie Of Voter Fraud

By       Message Joanne Boyer     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 7/10/12

Author 59592
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)
- Advertisement -

Other than the Supreme Court's Citizen's United ruling, there are few issues that tear at the basic fabric of democracy as much as the current assault by Republican-controlled state houses to enact voter photo ID laws. These laws, which have been written by the national American Legislative Exchange Council, and then "cut and pasted" into different state legislation are aimed solely at restricting and suppressing eligible citizens from casting their vote.

Recent news about estimates of more than 758,000 eligible voters in Pennsylvania being unable to cast a ballot this November has shed a spotlight on what this law is all about -- restricting access to the polls for eligible voters who tend to vote Democratic.

- Advertisement -


The lie of voter fraud is now on billboards
(Image by mnpACT)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Does anyone remember what caused former President George W. Bush's Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to finally resign? It was for the scandal surrounding the firing of eight U.S. Attorneys for their refusal to prosecute non-existent voter fraud. The Republican Party tried desperately to make "voter fraud" an issue from 2005-2010 and it simply could not be found -- anywhere. Not in any state in the nation.

Then in 2010 the Republicans took control of multiple state houses and POOF, like magic, back came voter fraud. The Republicans couldn't make it happen through the courts and the U.S. attorneys, so they found a much easier way. Get Republican controlled legislatures to pass ALEC legislation. Since 2010, 10 Republican-controlled states passed voter ID laws (Alabama, Kansas, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wisconsin).

- Advertisement -

The reality is voter fraud is a rarity in the United States, and voter impersonation at the polls, the only incident that could be prevented by these restrictive voter ID laws, is virtually nonexistent. Most instances of improper voting involve registration and eligibility issues, none of which would be prevented by a state photo ID restriction. One academic study found photo ID restrictions would prevent less than one fraudulent vote for every 1,000 legitimate voters who would be excluded from voting by the requirement.

Simply put: If you buy into the need for voter photo ID, you simply have fallen for the lie of voter fraud.

This ugly assault on democracy has made its way to Minnesota, where I reside, in a slightly different format. Although the 2010 elections brought a Republican controlled state senate and house to the Land of 10,000 Lakes, Democratic Governor Mark Dayton survived a recount vote -- without either side alleging voter fraud -- to take the governorship.

Running on that all too familiar jobs, jobs, jobs agenda, the Republicans turned immediately to trying to pass a voter photo ID law in 2011. Dayton vetoed it. After a shut down of the state government in July 2011, what was the first plan of action as the Republican legislature convened in January 2012? Voter photo ID again. This time though, they chose to bypass the governor's veto and put it on the ballot in November as an amendment to the state constitution.

Minnesota -- who continually leads the nation in voter turnout -- now faces the possibility of limiting voter rights and forcing estimates of more than 500,000 eligible voters from casting their vote if this initiative is allowed to stand as written.

The law currently is in the hands of the Minnesota Supreme Court based on court challenges that contend the language does not represent the full impact of the constitutional amendment.

The current language as passed by the Republican-controlled state legislature states:

- Advertisement -

"Shall the Minnesota Constitution be amended to require all voters to present valid photo identification to vote and to require the state to provide free identification to eligible voters, effective July 1, 2013?"

The Minnesota League of Women Voters does a magnificent job explaining what will really change and what's not mentioned in the amendment language. Click here to see the document.

The BRADBlog provided one of the most in-depth analyses of how the amendment changes forever Minnesota's rich tradition of voter turnout. Click here for more information.

To summarize:

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

www.WisdomVoices.com
Joanne Boyer is founder and editor of Wisdom Voices Press and www.WisdomVoices.com. Her first book is "Wisdom of Progressive Voices." Joanne has worked in professional communications for more than 30 years. Her career includes being the first (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Can Occupy Wall Street Push Us To Single Payer?

Doing The Work For The Real Health Care Victory: Single Payer

On, Wisconsin: The Legacy of "Fighting Bob" LaFollette

The Breadth and Depth of Voter Suppression Should Scare Us All

The Fraud of 'Voter Fraud'

Too Early To Chill The Champagne? Action Heats Up On Overturning Citizens United