Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 7 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

What I Learned at the Dog Park

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   1 comment
Author 93
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Bob Burnett
Become a Fan
  (23 fans)

I didn't attend the February 3rd Iowa Democratic Caucuses, but I did hold my own version of the caucus at our neighborhood dog park. The results are probably as accurate as those from Iowa: Biden lost, Bernie and Buttigieg tied for first place, and there's an opening for Bloomberg.

I live in West Sonoma County -- roughly 60 miles above San Francisco. Most days I take my Australian Shepherd to a well-equipped dog park. While my Aussie plays, I talk to a regular group of dog owners about dogs, life, and politics.

There's one golden rule of dog-park behavior: take care of your dog -- clean up after him/her and don't let them abuse other dogs. If you meet this standard then you are accepted. And, your political opinion is tolerated.

There may be a Trump supporter among this crew, but they've never come out. Over the past couple of years I've noticed that the dog-park crew are overwhelmingly Democrats. Some of them admit that in the 2016 presidential election they could not bring themselves to vote for Hillary Clinton, but they did not vote for Donald Trump; they either didn't mark their ballot or voted for Jill Stein.

After the results of the Iowa caucuses were in, I queried the dog-park crew about what they thought the results meant. Here's what I learned:

1.Any Democratic candidate is better than Trump but some Democratic candidates are better than others. (By the way: I never heard anyone say, "If Bernie doesn't get the nomination, I'm not going to vote" -- words that my stepson says he's heard from His "Burning Man" friends.)

2. Some folks really don't like Bernie Sanders. He got the most negative comments of any of the Democratic contenders. But that doesn't mean these dog-park denizens won't vote for Bernie in a contest against Trump.

3. There's no candidate that elicits universal praise. Most of the dog-park women like Elizabeth Warren but they are not "disciples" -- they don't have the fervor that we saw, from some women, when Hillary Clinton ran.

4. My homies don't like Trump because of his poor character. Sure, they don't agree with many of his policies -- such as his denial of global climate change -- but this isn't what's driving their political behavior. The dog-park crew can't stand Trump as a person. They cite his lying, intolerance, adversarial approach -- "my way or the highway," and all-around ineptitude.

5. For the dog-park denizens, this election is much more about character than policy. While from a policy perspective there is a liberal group and a moderate group of candidates, their ultimate choice for the Democratic candidate will be based upon their assessment of who would have the best chance of beating Trump -- and bringing dignity back to the oval office.

6. Everyone was surprised that Pete Buttigieg did so well in the Iowa caucuses. (Buttigieg and Sanders tied for first place.) The dog-park crew likes Mayor Pete but they don't know that much about him. Some wondered if a gay man can beat Trump.

7. No one was surprised that Joe Biden did not win. People like Joe but they don't believe he is strong enough to beat Trump.

8. There was mild surprise that Elizabeth Warren came in third. The dog-park women have Elizabeth as their first choice. Some men feel that Elizabeth reminds them of a school teacher, who lectured them.

9. I observed that the Iowa result might provide an opening for Michael Bloomberg -- who was not on the ballot in Iowa but will be on the ballot for the March 3rd California primary election. When I made this suggestion, nearly everyone around said, "I'd vote for Bloomberg."

10. Most of the dog-park crew expect there will be a contentious Democratic Presidential convention in mid-July.

Summary: From this perspective, it looks like the race for the Democratic nomination has narrowed to Buttigieg, Sanders, Warren, and Bloomberg. For the record, Buttigieg and Warren have dogs; Bloomberg and Sanders don't.

 

Well Said 1   Supported 1   Interesting 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Bob Burnett Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Bob Burnett is a Berkeley writer. In a previous life he was one of the executive founders of Cisco Systems.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ten Telltale Signs of Republican Disease

Big Liars and The Voters Who Love Them

Obama vs. Romney: The Bottom Line

The GOP Chooses Fascism

2011 Budget Battle: Obama Wins While Democrats Lose

Obama vs. Romney: The Popularity Contest

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments


molly cruz

Become a Fan
Author 7804
(Member since Sep 16, 2007), 15 fans, 17 articles, 638 quicklinks, 2895 comments, 14 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Love the metaphor. But as for Bloomberg, I think he'd have made a much bigger splash had he run on the Republican Ticket. After all, he is a Republican, complete with the racially tone deaf "Stop and Frisk" scenario; he could have shown Trump what REAL MONEY LOOKS LIKE; and possibly attracted the heretofore typically Jewish Democratic vote, if not that of African Americans. Pete's going to struggle with that one as it is. They'll clothe it otherwise, but they really don't like gays.

And, he could have promised to undo the mess Donald Trump has made of the GOP, as he leads it over the cliff to which he himself is headed. The entire Right Wing in Washington would have breathed an enormous sigh of relief and spilled their guts about Trump, like they did in the primaries. But as a Democrat he's wasting his time, for with Democrats, as with Tom Stayer: "Money can't buy you Love."

Submitted on Friday, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:34:36 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Help

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment