Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 12 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 8/5/11

Weeding Out The Crap From The National Dialogue

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   14 comments
Message Anthony Wade
Become a Fan
  (9 fans)


As American politics continues to veer off the closest cliff it can find I am left amazed at what passes for intelligent conversation these days within the body politic. I am stunned at what intelligent men and women allow into the national discourse as credible. Of course there is the continued Foxification of what used to be the media but beyond that, individuals who clearly must know better continue to allow people who simply do not know what they are talking about to mangle the truth.


That is why a major thumbs up needs to be given to New Jersey Governor Chris Christie; yes, that Chris Christie. I do not like Mr. Christie nor his politics. I think he is a bully who governs like he does not have to answer to anyone. That aside however, he nominated a judge to the State Superior Court in New Jersey this week who was Muslim. The outcry from the faux conservative wing of the GOP was that no Muslim should be nominated because they secretly want to implement Sharia Law. Christie's exact response was:


"The guy's an American citizen who has been an admitted lawyer to practice in the state of New Jersey, swearing an oath to uphold the laws of New Jersey, the constitution of the state of New Jersey, and the Constitution of the United States of America . . . .This Sharia law business is crap. It's just crazy. And I'm tired of dealing with the crazies."


Amen. I'm tired of dealing with the crazies too. As bad as Christie may be on a lot of issues, he is spot on here in calling crap, crap. But what about the rest of the national dialogue beyond the silliness of Sharia Law? Why can't politicians and media talking heads who don't work for Fox simply call crap, crap?


1) The notion that because the average American has to stay within a budget, so should the government, is total nonsense. It is an intellectually vacuous argument. It sounds good in a sound bite, but in reality can you actually imagine of there was a "balanced budget" amendment? Hurricane Katrina hits -- sorry we don't have any money in the budget for relief efforts. Russia invaded Alaska (for my Sarah Palin fans) -- sorry, maybe we can include some money next year to retaliate. The average American family does not have to deal with the types of emergencies that a government responsible for over 311 million people deals with. To compare the two is not even comparing apples and oranges. It is more like comparing seven year olds to the Founding Fathers (for my Michele Bachmann fans).


Not to mention that the average American family carries $14,000 of credit card debt. If you times that by 311 million you get four trillion, 354 billion dollars. Yes, I recognize that I am comparing families and individuals, but the point is the comparison itself is, for lack of a better word, crap. The truth behind the Tea Party untruths is not that they want the budget balanced; they want the government eliminated from doing anything. That is what they believe a balanced budget amendment would do. When the hurricane hits, they would have no problem sending aid, but you would be forced to cut something else out of the budget to pay for it. Thus whittling down the size of government until it could be drowned in a bathtub.


2) Stop saying, "The American people sent us here to"" Just because you managed to convince your one little district, in one state, to send you to Washington that does not mean the American people want you to dismantle the government. That is arrogant crap.


3) Stop the nonsense that the top 2% of this country are the "job creators." Rich people do not get rich by giving their money away. Reagan proved that trickle down economics does not work. The worst part is that the media continues to allow this argument as if it a matter of opinion. It is not. It is proven fact. George Bush Jr. passed two tax breaks for the richest Americans and claimed it would stimulate the economy and create jobs. Since then we have lost more jobs than created. We have decades worth of data to support the FACT that giving tax breaks for the most well off does not create jobs. It is a stale, tired and completely inaccurate talking point.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Well Said 6   Must Read 5   Valuable 4  
Rate It | View Ratings

Anthony Wade Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Anthony Wade, a contributing writer to, is dedicated to educating the populace to the lies and abuses of the government. He is a 53-year-old independent writer from New York with political commentary articles seen on multiple (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Preparing the Cover Story for the Theft of the Election

Sarah Palin, A Wolf in Moose Clothing

Hate and Hypocrisy Pays Well – The Rush Limbaugh Payoff

Birth of the Red-Letter Christian Movement

First They Came For the Soda"

Recognizing Glenn Beck's Religion

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend