Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (3 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
OpEdNews Op Eds

Was George W. Bush Aiding Al-Qaeda?

By       Message Peter Hart     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 8/11/13

Source: FAIR

New York Times story (8/9/13) about the sentencing phase of the trial of Army whistleblower Bradley Manning caught my eye with this headline: Witness in Manning Case Says Leaks Could Help Al-Qaeda

What the Times reported was this:

"A prosecution witness in the sentencing phase of the court-martial of Pfc. Bradley Manning told a military judge on Thursday that Al-Qaeda could have used WikiLeaks disclosures, including classified United States government materials provided by Private Manning, to encourage attacks in the West, in testimony meant to show the harm done by his actions."

So what was the evidence? The Times explains:

"The witness, Cmdr. Youssef Aboul-Enein, an adviser to the Pentagon's Joint Intelligence Task Force for Combating Terrorism, said that WikiLeaks materials showing that the United States had killed civilians, for instance, could help Al-Qaeda. 'Perception is important because it provides a good environment for recruitment, for fund-raising and for support for Al-Qaeda's wider audience and objectives,' he said."

So the potentially most damaging part of Manning's disclosures was that the war kills civilians -- and that U.S. enemies could use that fact to recruit others.

If that's the standard -- that the killing of civilians might rally people behind the cause of Al-Qaeda -- then shouldn't someone be talking to George W. Bush about ordering the invasion that caused all the killing? Of course not -- the only person facing punishment is the person who thought the rest of the world should know about it.

We -- and certainly many others -- have made the point that the prosecution of Manning should be treated seriously by journalists and press freedom advocates -- especially now that the government is laying out its case about what it considers to be the harm done by WikiLeaks.


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It
Peter Hart -- Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) ,

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Washington Post Editorial Page, Meet Noam Chomsky

The Media's New Climate Denial

The Washington Post's "Worthless and Whiny" Attack on Genuine Journalistic Hero Gary Webb

Chelsea Manning Speaks -- But Who Listened?

Brian Williams Frantically Tries to Prove He's No Glenn Greenwald

NYT Rewrites Gaza Headline: Was It Too Accurate?