Power of Story
Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
General News

USDA Kowtows to Canada's Threats, Denies U.S. Citizens Truthful Information About the Origins of Their Food

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message R-CALF USA     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Author 33524
- Advertisement -

On Sept. 30, 2008, USDA closed the public comment period for its interim final rule on Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling of Beef, Pork, Lamb, Chicken, Goat Meat, Perishable Agriculture Commodities, Peanuts, Pecans, Ginseng, and Macadamia Nuts (Interim Final COOL Rule). Although USDA was supposed to weigh the public interest based on the comments submitted to the agency that included the opinions of 11,796 consumers and others who participated in the public rule-making process as the basis for writing its Final COOL Rule, the agency, instead, capitulated to Canada's threat of retaliation against COOL at the Geneva-based WTO.

- Advertisement -

- Advertisement -

In a Jan. 7, 2009, exchange of letters between Canada's Ambassador to the WTO John Gero and the U.S. Ambassador to the WTO Peter F. Allgeier, the U.S. proposed to accommodate Canada's requested changes in the agency's Final COOL Rule in return for Canada's agreement not to pursue a WTO dispute for a period of eight months.

The documents also reveal that Canada requested concessions from USDA to allow the use of a mixed-origin label on products exclusively of U.S. origin and on meat derived from livestock imported into the U.S. for immediate slaughter. This quid pro quo proposal by the U.S. was issued eight days before USDA issued its Final COOL Rule, which granted Canada the concessions it sought.

- Advertisement -

"This should be a real eye opener for U.S. citizens," said R-CALF USA President/Region VI Director Max Thornsberry, DVM, MBA. "After more than six years of rule-making that involved the efforts of thousands of U.S. consumers and U.S. producers, USDA granted a foreign country Canada the opportunity to dictate the final contents of the Final COOL Rule, while U.S. consumers and producers were afforded no such opportunity."

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

R-CALF USA, Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrowers of America, represents thousands of U.S. cattle producers on domestic and international trade and marketing issues. R-CALF USA, a national, non-profit organization, is dedicated (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

FDA Plans to Break Food Safety Promise to America

USDA's Lax Import Rules Expose US Cattle to Mad Cow Disease

Wall Street Reform Act Already Benefiting Cattle Industry

USDA Kowtows to Canada's Threats, Denies U.S. Citizens Truthful Information About the Origins of Their Food

News Conference to address seizure of Herman Schumacher's home by Tyson Fresh Meats.

As Mad Cow Disease Scientist Prusiner Awarded Nat'l. Medal of Science, Group Urges USDA to Withdraw OTM Rule