Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Trump. The Art of the Con: Is There a Method to His Madness?

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Steven Jonas       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   2 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 3   Valuable 3   Must Read 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 9/25/18

Author 50778
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)
- Advertisement -

Introductory note, on 9/27/18. I posted this column two days ago. If you want to get a very good idea of what I am talking about in it just watch Trump's 9/26 "press conference" (.youtube.com/watch?v=g0yjTc3KiDY, really a Trump speech interrupted by questions, some of which he answered, many of which he didn't but simply used as jumping-off points for presenting major elements of his standard "always attack, never defend" persona). Although some will disagree, I think that his performance at that event to a great extent confirms my hypothesis presented below.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

A variety of words have been used to describe Donald Trump and Trump's White House/Presidency. They are being used with increasing frequency as various "inside the White House" books, like those of Bob Woodward and Michael Wolff, and "pretty close to Trump" books, have come out. Among them are "deranged," "unhinged," "chaotic," "crazy," "bordering on senile," and "mad." Trump is often described as "uncontrolled and uncontrollable." Now it may be true that he is really off-the-wall doing a combination of meandering through and charging through his Presidency without much direction other than "responding to his base." Certainly, from time-to-time I have thought so. But the more I have watched what this man has actually accomplished, the less I think that he is just lurching through it all, and the more I think that he knows exactly what he is doing (at least most of the time). That is, my answer now to the question I raised in the title of this column is "yes." And here's why.

Trump has a particular way of acting, very well known to everyone, that all started in the way he was brought up, particularly by his father (and I am not about to say here anything that any objective observer doesn't already know). He is a bully. He is poorly educated and doesn't care that he is. He is highly opinionated, without too much dependence on fact for his opinions. He is a racist from his youth. He is a faker/liar from the beginning, e.g., indeed he went to the Wharton School (likely with a paid-for entry-form) but there is no evidence (to my knowledge) that he received its graduate degree. And so on and so forth.

- Advertisement -

From flickr.com: Indeed, Donald, you are not qualified.  But you did get there didn't you, you old con artist you. {MID-315057}
Indeed, Donald, you are not qualified. But you did get there didn't you, you old con artist you.
(Image by IoSonoUnaFotoCamera)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Then, as an adult (again as is well-known) he came under the influence of the McCarthyite lawyer Roy Cohn, a Master Practitioner of "Always Attack; Never Defend" as THE way to get ahead in life. (The well-known Republican operative Lee Atwater later developed the tactic to its highest form, working for George H.W. Bush, but by then it was already well-ingrained in Trump.) Trump has used the technique from his earliest days in the real estate business, for example serially stiffing everyone from lawyers to contractors to workers, and then when they came to try to collect going on the offensive against them with counter-suits and the invocation of his oh-so-frequently-used non-disclosure agreements. Always attack. Never defend. The Presidential tweets, of course, some written by him, some obviously written by some hidden tweet-staff, are all part of this elaborately-planned strategy. (And it is, in my view, a strategy, not just a series of unconnected tactics.)

- Advertisement -

The most current of these is how he handling the revelations about Judge Kavanaugh's sex life and drinking habits. After briefly giving a modicum of respect to Dr. Ford, he has gone into full-throated, "always attack" roar against her character, her memory, and her motivation for coming forward, applying this tactic to any subsequent witnesses to Judge Kavanaugh's earlier behaviors. But then the list of those subject to the tactic is endless, from Democrats like Obama, Clinton, and Diane Feinstein, to his own appointees and colleagues like Sessions, Rosenstein, Mike Cohen, Papadopoulos, Manafort, to "The Democrats" and "The Media" (except, of course for Trump TV) who are always plotting against him. (For some reason, has hasn't attacked Mike Flynn yet. Maybe he knows too much.)

From flickr.com: A protester against the confirmation of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh outside the Warren E. Burger Federal Building in St. Paul, Minnesota. Indeed, Chief Justice Burger used to be the definition of conservative. {MID-315059}
A protester against the confirmation of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh outside the Warren E. Burger Federal Building in St. Paul, Minnesota. Indeed, Chief Justice Burger used to be the definition of .conservative..
(Image by Lorie Shaull)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

His other favorite tactic has been Distraction. He calls the FBI and the DOJ a "cancer" and then gets the discussion off, for example what the Mueller investigation has revealed so far and who is cooperating with it, onto whether or not that is a correct characterization (and of course his echo chamber at Trump TV says that it is). When in North Carolina to observe the tremendous damage done by Hurricane Florence and the subsequent flooding he seemingly randomly mentions his own golf course down there. Random? I don't think so. He got the conversation away from the spotty Federal response to the disaster onto whether or not he should have talking about his golf course. The Puerto Rican disaster and the true death toll? By challenging the accuracy of the Georgetown University study and broadsiding attacks on the Governor and the Mayor of San Juan he gets the discussion off the disastrous response of the Federal government and onto what indeed the true death toll was, as well as what the Mayor and the Governor did or did not do. And so on and so forth.

Part of this is the continuous attack on "fake news" (the equivalent of the Hitlerite "Luegenpresse," "lying press"), the use of terms like "alternate reality" (famously Kelly Anne Conway) and "truth isn't truth" (famously Rudy Giuliani) and of course his total ignoring of the ever-growing roster of lies that he has told, now approaching 5000 I think. We might say that Trump has uniquely developed an alternate to the Roy Cohn dictum. And that would be "Always Distract; Never Defend." Like, for a further example, scheduling what may be the showdown with Rod Rosenstein on the same day as the Senate "hearings" (ho, ho, ho) on Judge Kavanaugh and sex, and alcohol too.

Since this sort of thing happens over and over again with Trump, I don't think that it is accidental or the product of an out-of-control, deranged mind. I think that, for the most part, it is the product of a very well-planned mode of dealing with the press, the Congress, his base, and the rest of the general public/electorate. Just take a look at what Trump has actually accomplished during his Presidency:

- Advertisement -

* The huge tax cut for the rich and the large corporations;

* a gradual implementation of Steve Bannon's number one goal, the "Deconstruction of the [Federal] Administrative state;"

* the total abandonment of any Federal efforts to deal with number one problem facing the future of humanity and the adoption of various actions that will make climate change worse;

* the further ramping up of the military-industrial complex;

* the just-now adoption of a new National Enemy, China (there hasn't been one since "Radical Islam" just fractured and Iran is just too small to do the trick --- since the end World War II the U.S. ruling class has always tried to make sure that there was one and China may well fill the bill --- this will be the subject of a future column);

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Interesting 3   Valuable 3   Must Read 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Steven Jonas, MD, MPH, MS is a Professor Emeritus of Preventive Medicine at StonyBrookMedicine (NY) and author/co-author/editor/co-editor of over 35 books. In addition to his position on OpEdNews as a "Trusted Author," he is a Senior Editor, (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Pope Francis and Change in the Roman Catholic Church

Limbaugh, Santorum, Sex, and the Origins of the Roman Catholic Church

The "Irrepressible Conflict" and the Coming Second Civil War

Gay Marriage and the Constitution

The Republican Party and the Separation of Church and State: Change Does Happen

What the Gunners Want: What's in Rick Perry's Pocket, Unlimited

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments


David Watts

Become a Fan
Author 10429

(Member since Jan 31, 2008), 10 fans, 11 articles, 21 quicklinks, 1299 comments, 27 diaries


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Interesting. I think there is a lot to what you say. Trump is a con man who can get the dialogue off what would normally be the dialogue and on to his distractive dialogue. His dialogue is not important. The one that is is the one he distracted us from.

Submitted on Wednesday, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:52:16 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Mrs. Fuxit

Become a Fan
Author 508454

(Member since Mar 18, 2017), 1 fan, 1 quicklinks, 228 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content
You can't bullsh!t a bullsh!tter. Ask Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton why.

Submitted on Thursday, Sep 27, 2018 at 2:35:14 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment