Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 56 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News    H2'ed 10/9/14

Transcript 3: Scott Lilienfeld, President of the Society for the Scientific Study of Psychopathy

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   No comments, 3 series
Scott Lilienfeld
Scott Lilienfeld
(Image by Scott Lilienfeld)
  Details   DMCA
Part three of a three part transcript.
Here's a link to the audio Podcast of the Interview with Scott Lilienfeld

Rob: In the paper, the extensive, long paper that you sent me, it was kind of a summary, it gave a couple is that they are promiscuous and engaging coercive sexuality, i.e., rape...

SL: Yes.

Rob: And that they...basically, "the general population is predominantly cooperative, honest and trusting, which allows the small portions of individuals" -- I'm quoting from this paper -- "to capitalize on this benevolence by cheating--stealing valuable resources, and engaging in promiscuous sexual behavior."

SL: Yes, that's right. And so this comes a bit...I think another model, which is related to the first model I talked about -- they're not mutually incompatible -- is...comes out of something called game theory. And if people have seen the movie, A Beautiful Mind, about John Nash, people may remember that movie about the brilliant Princeton mathematician. He actually first developed these models that imply a particular kind of natural selection, not to be too technical, but if I can throw in one piece of lingo here...the term is frequency dependent selection. That's a bit of lingo, but I can explain how it, if you believe this frequency dependent selection model, what you believe is that, I think you described it well, most people in societies -- in almost every society -- are honest. Most people are cooperative. So what that will often mean is that people who do cheat, people who do take advantage of other people...will have a selective advantage. So what that model implies is when most people are honest, if there's some genetic theory building the population, that may encourage a few people, maybe about 5%, that's almost every culture it's been studied about 5% of people seem to account for 50/60% of all maybe 5% or a bit less, to be dishonest and to cheat -- to take advantage of other people. Now why does that 5% not become 50%, eventually 100%? Well, because the other 95% of people become aware of that 5% and they develop things like police (which we have) and laws (which we have) and other people to engage in surveillance, and that keeps that number at a stable level. Sometimes it may push it back below 5%, but when it gets too low, people get too trusting again and get...and start becoming complacent and then that 5% starts creeping back up again. And then if it gets too high, it starts going back down again. So it kind of reaches what is sometimes called a Nash -- after John Nash -- Nash Equilibrium, a kind of roughly, stable but low percentage of people in almost every culture who lie, cheat and steal. And that's one potential interesting model.

Rob: Okay. I'm really feeling the time pressure here. We don't have that much time left. And I've got so much more to ask you.

SL: I've got another ten minutes or so, so that's fine.

Rob: Okay good. I call my show The Bottom Up Radio Show because I believe we're in a transition from a top-down to a more bottom-up culture. A top-down culture is what civilization is based on, and I believe that before there was civilization in tribal and band cultures, there was much more bottom- up interaction and that was the nature of culture. And with civilization came hierarchy, centralization, and domination. And I see a tie between psychopathy and domination and hierarchy. Can you get into talking about that at all?

SL: Yes, it's interesting. I don't know if I have much profound to add to that. I don't know, other than to say the obvious, which is that part of psychopathy is indeed dominance. Part of psychopathy is indeed predation. And once you start having, if I'm understanding your reasoning correctly, once you start having a very top-down society, there's always a risk that some individuals will occupy powerful positions, positions of leadership, who will then impose that power on others. And what I think the concern that some of us have, although there's very little research on this, is that again, some of these occupations, particularly in the domain of politics and maybe corporate CEOs, maybe inadvertently selecting for people some high levels of these traits. And as a result, what you might end up with is not merely a top-down society, but a psychopath-down society, I'm sure it's grossly oversimplified -- there are plenty of great leaders out there who are definitely not psychopaths, no question about that. But you might, if you're not careful enough, and if you have a citizenry that is not careful enough to evaluate its leaders thoughtfully, you might end up with a leadership hierarchy that is populated with too many people with these traits who then can impose some of their will on others.

Rob: Pretty scary thought. But I don't think it's that unrealistic either. I think that...

SL: Yeah, I think luckily, again maybe I'm idealistic, I think luckily that democratic society...we do have...people often aren't as vigilant as they could be but I do think when people are egregiously bad they usually do get voted out of office. So the one thing you will see about most psychopathic people -- not all -- but most of them are their own worst enemies in the long run. So even though they can fool people in the short run, more often than not, I think what you'll see is they will get themselves in trouble and find their way into scandal at some point. So I think there is a self-correction built into the system although sometimes these people can certainly wreak havoc in the short run. I think where it's more problematic, frankly, is in non-democratic societies where people don't have a voice, when people don't have a vote, and that's I think much worse, much more problematic. So in totalitarian organizations where you have people who can assume power by brute force and there's no opportunity to vote these people out, then I think you have a really dangerous combination.

Rob: Well you used the word, totalitarian, but so much of our culture -- our corporate culture in particular -- is top-down authoritarian culture. Isn't there a greater risk there too?

SL: Yeah, I think there is. I mean I think what that implies is that (A) there's a greater need to understand the implications of psychopathy for corporate culture and (B) the general public -- I think you're obviously doing this with your shows -- needs to be better educated to recognize these traits and to recognize how we can be fooled and duped by these traits because people with these traits often can seem to be altruistic, can seem to care for others, can seem to be charming and seductive, but may not always have our best interests at heart.

Rob: This is the Rob Kall Bottom Up Radio Show WNJC 1360 AM, sponsored by I've been talking with Scott Lilienfeld. He is the head...the President, is it?

SL: The President, right.

Rob: Of the Society for the Scientific Study of Psychopathy. He's a Professor of Psychology at Emory University. And we've been talking about the state of knowledge of psychopathy today. If you've come in late for listening to the show, you can go to with an 's' on the end to find the show and listen to the whole show, or you can go to iTunes, so it'll be up in about a day. We're going to continue the conversation though.

As I started Scott in this conversation, I told you I believe that what is needed is a massive project -- a mission to raise public awareness to understand psychopaths better, understand what they do, and to understand how to deal with them. Now what we really haven't talked about at all is how do you deal with psychopaths and their predatory nature, and the pain and the suffering and the hurt that they do? And I don't know that we're going to have time to do that in this conversation, but where I want to finish the conversation is to talk about the idea that I have that we need something like an Apollo Moon Landing, a Manhattan Project that invests massively more, proportional to the damage that they do -- and is there anybody talking about this? Is this something that has any potential or is this something you're interested in? What do you think about that?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Rob Kall Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Rob Kall is an award winning journalist, inventor, software architect, connector and visionary. His work and his writing have been featured in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, CNN, ABC, the HuffingtonPost, Success, Discover and other media. 

Check out his platform at

He is the author of The Bottom-up Revolution; Mastering the Emerging World of Connectivity

He's given talks and workshops to Fortune 500 execs and national medical and psychological organizations, and pioneered first-of-their-kind conferences in Positive Psychology, Brain Science and Story. He hosts some of the world's smartest, most interesting and powerful people on his Bottom Up Radio Show, and founded and publishes one of the top Google- ranked progressive news and opinion sites,

more detailed bio: 

Rob Kall has spent his adult life as an awakener and empowerer-- first in the field of biofeedback, inventing products, developing software and a music recording label, MuPsych, within the company he founded in 1978-- Futurehealth, and founding, organizing and running 3 conferences: Winter Brain, on Neurofeedback and consciousness, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology (a pioneer in the field of Positive Psychology, first presenting workshops on it in 1985) and Storycon Summit Meeting on the Art Science and Application of Story-- each the first of their kind.  Then, when he found the process of raising people's consciousness and empowering them to take more control of their lives  one person at a time was too slow, he founded which has been the top search result on Google for the terms liberal news and progressive opinion for several years. Rob began his Bottom-up Radio show, broadcast on WNJC 1360 AM to Metro Philly, also available on iTunes, covering the transition of our culture, business and world from predominantly Top-down (hierarchical, centralized, authoritarian, patriarchal, big)  to bottom-up (egalitarian, local, interdependent, grassroots, archetypal feminine and small.) Recent long-term projects include a book, Bottom-up-- The Connection Revolution, debillionairizing the planet (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Debunking Hillary's Specious Winning the Popular Vote Claim

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Hillary's Disingenuous Claim That She's Won 2.5 Million More Votes is Bogus. Here's why

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend