Power of Story
Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (3 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   16 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Top Psychiatrist's Stunning Announcement about Gun Violence

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Paula J Caplan     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 5   Valuable 4   Supported 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 10/10/15

Author 91418
Become a Fan
  (3 fans)
From flickr.com/photos/66212741@N08/8137358189/: Politicians don't want to hear it.
Politicians don't want to hear it.
(Image by CircaSassy)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

POLITICIANS IGNORE APA PRESIDENT'S TRUTHTELLING AND PLEAS

After each highly publicized gun-violence incident, some lawmakers--whether with good intention, for political gain, or both--declare that we must have laws to keep guns out of the hands of people with mental illness. It is therefore stunning and profoundly important to note Sunday's blog post (link is external) from the American Psychiatric Association's president, Dr. Renee Binder.

As chief executive of the major lobby group that advocates for the interests of psychiatrists, Binder might have been expected to recommend an increase in psychiatric treatment for the mentally ill as a way to reduce gun violence. Amazingly, she not only did not make that recommendation, but she made the powerful--and well-documented--statement that people diagnosed with mental illness are far more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators of it and that most of the mentally ill will never commit acts of violence against others. Thus, to pass laws to prevent the mentally ill from owning guns is no way to reduce the frequency of murders. In fact, as Binder pointed out, "Stronger indicators of risk include a history of violent behavior, domestic violence, and drug or alcohol abuse."

Politicians on the Sunday morning news shows either failed to read Binder's essay or chose to ignore it and plowed right ahead, pushing for gun laws about the mentally ill. And on Monday morning, former Congressman Patrick Kennedy appeared on CBS, making an impassioned plea to prevent the mentally ill from owning guns and making the bold--and unfounded--assertion that that such a step would have prevented the most recent mass shooting. It will be worth watching to see if, over time, Binder's strong statement alters politicians' proposals. Today, Republican Presidential candidate Ben Carson made a similar plea.

- Advertisement -

Two important points shed further light on this matter. One arises from the fact that the primary way that "the mentally ill" are identified is by their having been given psychiatric diagnoses, but a vast body of work over three decades has revealed psychiatric-diagnostic categories to be constructed and applied with little or no scientific support, so attempts to divide the populace into "the mentally ill" and "everyone else"--and aim to pass laws affecting the former--make no sense.

The other relevant point is that the ballooning numbers of categories and subcategories that are called mental illnesses has led to the psychiatrizing of our society, the tendency of therapists, media people, the public, even some novelists to try to explain every aspect of human behavior as caused by a mental illness. This often takes the form of, "Person X did Y, and the fact that they did Y proves that they are mentally ill, because Y (almost any action or expression) is a mental illness." Defense attorneys operating in a system that is often stacked against the accused, especially if the latter are poor or women or people of color, understandably try to get their clients diagnosed as mentally ill, hoping to argue that the psychiatric disorder is reason for a reduced sentence. As a result, a confounding factor we will increasingly need to consider is that an artificially created correlation between a diagnosis of mental illness and commission of a violent act will result, as anyone charged with an act of violence is increasingly likely to be labeled mentally ill. As that happens, it will unjustifiably become ammunition for those who want to base laws on the notion that "the mentally ill" are more dangerous than the rest of the populace.

- Advertisement -

Copyright 2015 by Paula J. Caplan All rights reserved

Originally posted at click here on October 8, 2015, and published there October 9, 2015.

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 5   Valuable 4   Supported 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

http://www.paulajcaplan.net

Paula J. Caplan, Ph.D., is an advocate, activist, clinical and research psychologist, and awardwinning nonfiction author and playwright. She is Associate at the DuBois Institute, Harvard University, and a past Fellow in the Harvard Kennedy (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Workplace Sexism Causes Human Rights Violations, Major ReportShows

Top Psychiatrist's Stunning Announcement about Gun Violence

Equal Means Equal: Fight for Women's Rights

Diagnosisgate: Major Mental Health System Expose

Human Rights, Disclosing the Truth, and Psychiatric Diagnosis

Major Media Blackout Mystery