This article originally appeared at TomDispatch.com. To receive TomDispatch in your inbox three times a week, click here.
Yes, on a radio show, Israeli Minister of Heritage Amihai Eliyahu insisted that there were "no non-combatants in Gaza" (assumedly including the thousands of young people slaughtered in recent weeks in that "children's graveyard"). He then added that "one option" for Israel was to consider using a nuclear weapon and so wiping out more or less everyone left in that strip of land hardly bigger than two Washington, D.C.s. (Forget the radioactive fallout that would hit Israel as well.) And yes, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quickly "suspended" him from regular cabinet meetings (even if that, as it turns out, wasn't the most meaningful of actions).
It's also true that Israel, one of the planet's nine nuclear powers, has only and given the nightmarish impact of such weaponry that has to be italicized an estimated 90 such weapons, while the United States and Russia each have more than 5,000. Still, consider Eliyahu's comment a rare admission by an Israeli official that his country is even nuclear armed. As Netanyahu himself typically said years ago, "We have a longstanding policy that we won't be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into the Middle East."
"Introduce" assumedly meaning to create a Middle Eastern version of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Consider it, in fact, little short of a miracle that, in the 78 years since August 9, 1945, when that second American atomic bomb devastated the Japanese city of Nagasaki, not another one has ever been used, even as such weaponry spread and arsenals grew. And let's hope that, despite the carnage still underway in Gaza (and Hamas's threats to launch more October 7ths until Israel is "annihilated"), this remains the case. Sadly enough, though, as TomDispatch regular Joshua Frank, author of Atomic Days: The Untold Story of the Most Toxic Place in America, makes all too clear today, nuclear weapons aren't the only way humanity has to create a hell on Earth. Tom
The Dangers Only Multiply
Could Israel's War on Gaza Go Nuclear?
By Joshua Frank
Israel's robust military, the fourth-strongest in the world, is ravaging Gaza and, along with armed settlers, terrorizing Palestinians in the West Bank following the brutal Hamas massacres of October 7th. Like so many other colonial projects, Israel was born of terror and has necessitated the use of violence to occupy Arab territory and segregate Palestinians ever since. The realization that its existence was dependent on a superior military in an unfriendly region also encouraged Israel to pursue a nuclear weapons program shortly after the state's founding in 1948.
Even though Israel was a young nation, by the mid-1950s, with the aid of France, it had secretly begun the construction of a large nuclear reactor. That two allies had teamed up to launch a nuclear weapons program without the knowledge of the administration of President Dwight D. Eisenhower turned out to be a colossal (and embarrassing) American intelligence failure.
Not until June 1960, the final year of Eisenhower's presidency, did U.S. officials catch wind of what was already known as the Dimona project. Daniel Kimhi, an Israeli oil magnate, having undoubtedly had one too many cocktails at a late-night party at the U.S. embassy in Tel Aviv, confessed to American diplomats that Israel was indeed constructing a large "power reactor" in the Negev desert a startling revelation.
"This project has been described to [Kimhi] as a gas-cooled power reactor capable of producing approximately 60 megawatts of electric power," read an embassy dispatch addressed to the State Department in August 1960. "[Kimhi] said he thought work had been underway for about two years and that a completion date was still about two years off."
The Dimona reactor wasn't, however, being built to deal with the country's growing energy needs. As the U.S. would later discover, it was designed (with input from the French) to produce plutonium for a budding Israeli nuclear weapons program. In December 1960, as American officials grew more worried about the very idea of Israel's nuclear aspirations, French Foreign Minister Maurice Couve de Murville admitted to U.S. Secretary of State Christian Herter that France had, in fact, helped Israel get the project off the ground and would also provide the raw materials like uranium the reactor needed. As a result, it would get a share of any plutonium Dimona produced.
Israeli and French officials assured Eisenhower that Dimona was being built solely for peaceful purposes. Trying to further deflect attention, Israeli officials put forward several cover stories to back up that claim, asserting Dimona would become anything from a textile plant to a meteorological installation anything but a nuclear reactor capable of producing weapons-grade plutonium.
Atomic Denials
In December 1960, after being tipped off by a British nuclear scientist concerned that Israel was constructing a dirty (that is, extremely radioactive) nuke, reporter Chapman Pincher wrote in London's Daily Express: "British and American intelligence authorities believe that the Israelis are well on the way to building their first experimental nuclear bomb."
Israeli officials issued a terse dispatch from their London embassy: "Israel is not building an atom bomb and has no intention of doing so."
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
