Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 9 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News    H2'ed 1/29/20

The Supreme Court Just Put Immigrants In the Crosshairs--Again

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   1 comment
Author 512627
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Ted Millar
Become a Fan

Immigration
Immigration
(Image by Youth Voices Live)
  Details   DMCA

In August, the Trump administration ramped up its next phase in the war on immigrants when it decided to deny green cards or visas to immigrants who rely on public benefits like Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, Medicaid, and Section-8 housing.

On Monday, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled 5-4 to permit this "public charges" policy to proceed.

The rule was supposed to begin in October but met opposition from federal courts in California, Maryland, and New York, whom Justice Neil Gorsuch rebuked for issuing "nationwide injunctions":

"The rise of nationwide injunctions may just be a sign of our impatient times. But good judicial decisions are usually tempered by older virtues."

Immigrant rights activists were quick to call out his hypocrisy.

American Immigration Council policy analyst, Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, criticized:

"The minute a Democratic president starts issuing regulations that the conservative members of the Supreme Court disagree with, watch them suddenly drop all opposition to nationwide injunctions."

Last August's public charge rule dates back to 19th century law, which state and local governments used against emancipated slaves or poor and infirm immigrants.

More than 100 companies, including Twitter, Microsoft, and LinkedIn filed an amicus brief Jan. 16, arguing the public charge rule "creates substantial, unprecedented, and unnecessary obstacles for individuals seeking to come to the United States or, once here, to adjust their immigration status," adding:

"Immigrants will receive fewer public benefits under the Rule, they will cut back their consumption of goods and services, depressing demand throughout the economy."

The companies also asserted the rule causes enrollment of health services including the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) to decline.

Calling the court's ruling "shameful," Amnesty International USA's Americas Advocacy Airector, Charanya Krishnaswami, explained:

"The so-called 'public charge' rule is nothing more than a repackaging of demonstrably false and harmful stereotypes about migrants. By allowing it to proceed, SCOTUS is allowing the administration to weaponize xenophobia."

A Kaiser Family Foundation analysis shows that, in addition to an anticipated decline in low-income immigrants seeking necessary services, about 42 percent of legal immigrants could experience green card applications "weighed negatively."

Last year, the State Department cited "public charge" grounds to disqualify over 12,000 visa applicants.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Ted Millar Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Ted Millar is a writer and teacher. His work has been in featured in myriad literary journals, including Straight Forward Poetry, Better Than Starbucks, the Broke Bohemian, Caesura, Circle Show, Cactus Heart, Third Wednesday, and The Voices (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

FBI Apprehends Another Trump Supporter Plotting A Massacre

Discovered Documents Reveal Trump Tax and Bank Fraud

Republicans' Stance On HR 1 Confirms They Prefer A Rigged System

The GOP Might Use The Shutdown To Justify 'Starving the Beast'

Whistleblowers: The Trump Admin Behind Saudi Nuclear Plants

Trump's Trip To Walter Reed Might Be A Sign He's Preparing To Resign

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments


KurtB

Become a Fan
Author 84481
(Member since Dec 9, 2012), 3 fans, 830 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

I just shake my head in disbelief at the people who want to import more taxpayer liabilities into the country. It is motivated by a selfish desire to create a dependent constituency willing to vote for big government control of the country.

People wanting to move here should contribute, not consume public resources.

Submitted on Thursday, Jan 30, 2020 at 2:30:02 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Help

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment