Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 76 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 3/10/19

Republicans' Stance On HR 1 Confirms They Prefer A Rigged System

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   2 comments
Author 512627
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Ted Millar
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

I-voted-november-2014
I-voted-november-2014
(Image by el cajon yacht club)
  Details   DMCA

On Friday, the new Democratic majority in the House of Representatives passed House Resolution (HR) 1, or the "For The People Act," with 100% Democratic support.

Not a single Republican voted for it.

This may come as no surprise, especially in today's tribal political milieu.

But when we break down what HR 1 seeks to address, we get a better look into how the modern-day GOP is just fine with corruption, corporate greed, and an anti-democratic ideology.

HR 1 is broken down into three sections:

  1. Protecting and expanding voting rights and election security
  2. Reducing the influence of big money in our political process
  3. Ensuring an ethical government accountable to the people, not corporations

Section one, dedicated to voting rights, supports to following:

Section two, about the corrosive influence of big money in politics, boasts:

  • Requiring clandestine organizations to disclose their donors
  • Upgrading online political spending-transparency rules so voters know who is paying for advertisements
  • Creating a small grassroots public financing-matching system so congressional candidates aren't forced to rely on big money donors
  • Strengthening oversight rules so those guilty of violating campaign-finance laws are held accountable
  • Overhauling the Federal Election Commission (FEC) so it appropriately enforces campaign-finance laws
  • Prohibiting shell companies from pumping foreign money into U.S. elections
  • Requiring government contractors to disclose their political spending
  • Requiring the IRS to regulate 501(c)4 organizations.
  • Requiring presidential inaugural committees to disclose funding and spending.
  • Requiring public campaign-fund matching for House candidates, for which there will be a 6:1 public match up to $200 per contributor, candidates must reject large donations in order to be eligible, and they must demonstrate broad public support.

Section three, seeking to ensure accountability to the people instead of wealthy corporations, states:

  • Addressing the "revolving door" between government officials and lobbyists
  • Expanding conflict-of-interest laws
  • Banning congressional members from sitting on corporate boards
  • Requiring major party presidential candidates to release their tax returns
  • Overhauling the Office of Government Ethics to strengthen enforcement of ethics rules
  • Requiring a judicial code of ethics for U.S. Supreme Court justices

Once again, not a single Republican voted in favor of these sweeping changes to our electoral system.

This means not a single Republican is willing to go on the record favoring free and fair elections.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell labeled HR 1 a "radical, half-baked socialist proposal," "a political power grab."

Of course it's "socialist;" everything Republicans oppose now is going to be maligned as "socialist."

But how can legislation that doesn't address a single economic issue be socialist?

HR 1 is about reforming our elections and campaign finance, two issues Republicans don't want to touch since they primarily benefit from the status quo.

As Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said:

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

 

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Ted Millar Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Ted Millar is a writer and teacher. His work has been in featured in myriad literary journals, including Straight Forward Poetry, Better Than Starbucks, the Broke Bohemian, Caesura, Circle Show, Cactus Heart, Third Wednesday, and The Voices (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

FBI Apprehends Another Trump Supporter Plotting A Massacre

Discovered Documents Reveal Trump Tax and Bank Fraud

Republicans' Stance On HR 1 Confirms They Prefer A Rigged System

Rumors of Trump's Possible Drug Addiction Need to Be Taken Seriously

Bernie is Not a Socialist--He's a Traditional FDR Democrat

The GOP Might Use The Shutdown To Justify 'Starving the Beast'

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: