Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

The Stimulus and The Confidence Game

By       Message Cameron Salisbury       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   No comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Author 5613
- Advertisement -

The Sears appliances I bought last summer came with great teaser financing from Citibank available only if I took out a new credit card.  The interest rate on the card was a bargain at only 19% because of my sterling credit history.  The accompanying disclosure statement informed me that the rate could go as high as 32% if I screwed up and went over my credit limit, paid late, missed a payment, acted badly with any of my other creditors, jaywalked, yelled at my kids or did anything else they frowned on.


Their disclosure statement was not required to tell me that if I paid no more than their monthly minimum my balance would double every few years. 


Last week, along with a notice that their interest charges were going up, they sent a note defending the increase by shamelessly blaming the current tough economic climate--the one that they have relentlessly and unapologetically done so much to create.


Everyone knows that U.S. consumers have put away their wallets.  But while American consumption and the use of credit cards is dropping like a millstone, the total amount of outstanding debt remains ominously, bizarrely, unchanged (Federal Reserve, release G 19).  Because the unregulated credit industry is allowed to change the rules, their interest rates and conditions, and your indebtedness in the middle of the game, spending less does not mean owing less. 

- Advertisement -

In Detroit, the elderly freeze to death when their gas is turned off.  In Florida, the formerly employed live in cars for months and longer. Roughly one in nine homes are now vacant and no one seems to have a good handle on whatever has become of the foreclosed families.


The evening news is filled with stories about the newly unemployed, the newly uninsured, and those watching in their living rooms feel a chill of recognition.  They look so much like the rest of us.  How long before we're a part of, instead of a spectator at, society's unraveling?   


Despite the illogical daily bluster of the Wall Street swindlers, their academic and government enablers and TVs talking bobble-heads, the trillion dollar bail out of the financial sector, has not, will not, and cannot solve the nation's economic problems.

- Advertisement -

All that ever actually sustained our financial system was an illusion that has evaporated: confidence in the protective capacity of our government and regulatory systems. The most critical obstacle to economic recovery now is the national sense of alienation from the institutions and the government we once thought would protect us from the capitalist crapshoot. The public's deep sense of anxiety, distrust and betrayal, the crisis of confidence, will not be fixed until our institutions are, with or without full employment.  


During the 1930s President Franklin Roosevelt initiated regulatory reforms of Wall Street and the banking industry that restored a battered nation's faith in the future. With the introduction of the Social Security safety net to protect the unemployed, the aged, the disabled and the widowed, the launching platform for the 'American Century' was in place.


It lasted 50 prosperous years until Reagan, Clinton, and Bush II systematically deep-sixed as many of those guaranteed protections as they could get away with, and handed the levers of the nation's well-being to privateers.  American economic power shifted from a manufacturing base to the mainly East Coast, mainly Wall Street, financial sector.  Anti trust laws were decimated and mergers infested the economy leaving consumers with fewer and more expensive choices as well as declining wages and increasing responsibility for themselves, their families and their future. Now, corporations reign anew, the safety net is in tatters, and people are scared. Again.


Thanks to our politicians, much of the way back has been sealed off.  Shoring up American workers and American jobs is decried as 'protectionism' by the same lost souls in the media and government who brought us 'free trade' and the current national and personal catastrophe. 


There won't be a return to the American century, but there can be a good life in our future, and a workable transition now, if we strengthen the safety net while we work for re-regulation and responsive politicians.  Here are my suggestions:


First, people thrown out of work by Wall Street grifters and their government enablers deserve a little dignity in the form of a  guaranteed income for the duration.  Unemployment benefits should be extended until the economy recovers, possibly ten years.  Pay for it by yanking back, clawing back, and redirecting the $1.7 (so far) trillion bail out  for banking and Wall Street hucksters whose behavior throughout has been the very definition of criminal, a fact that only our politicians seem to misunderstand.

- Advertisement -

Second, the banking system must be reformed from the ground up.  The American people are starved for honesty, accountability and transparency in finances that now seem out of their hands and out of control. Bring ethics, reason and capitalism back to the financial sector by letting banks that have driven themselves into bankruptcy fail and regulating the new ones that form. Stop using the American taxpayer to protect the lawless from the results of their own behavior. 


Usury laws must return to the financial system to keep credit users from being thrown under the bus by rapacious and unpredictable creditors, and to lessen the sense of chaos in the social fabric.


Third, stop foreclosures by freezing the teaser rates for anyone who still has a job and a house they want to keep.  Our wealthy bankers can afford to make a reasonable profit instead of a windfall on every transaction, but if it can't, well, taxpayers should foreclose them.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Cameron Salisbury is a biostatistician, epidemiologist and grant writer living in Atlanta.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

TSA Solves Its PR Problem: No More Cameras!

Looming Catastrophe: Demise of the Ogallala Aquifer

Indestructible Food: With Love from America, Inc.

Detroit vs. Wall Street: The Trillion Dollar Class War

Trickle Up Poverty and the Paulson Railroad

That Giant Sucking Sound and East Coast Wealth: Will the U.S. Split Apart?