Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 13 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 4/28/10

The New Coverture, the Right's Answer to Marriage

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   4 comments

To define coverture is to go back in time when a woman gave up any rights of independence to her husband, for she was under the protection, power and influence of him. It was her place in marriage to be the homemaker and the child caregiver and his place to earn the income. Labor was divided between the sexes because it was the natural thing to do. Women had their place in society and within the marriage.

The traditional views of marriage tell women that it is their duty to play their role in this marital relationship. Men and women are not equally qualified to perform the roles of the other. Vows were taken at the altar to love, honor and obey their husband.

This medieval concept of marriage lingered for hundreds of years where women were more property than partner until the equality of women began to emerge. Women finally obtained the right to vote, then moved into those traditional fields that only men had occupied. Their struggle for equality continues to be an ongoing effort.

Today we see a new woman, much different from our mothers and grandmothers even, one that is capable of doing much more than she could 100 years ago. Marriage laws also changed giving her greater responsibilities in the marriage contract. She is less likely to be automatically given child caregiver custody in divorce. There is greater equality in who pays whom alimony.

The Right wants to define marriage in an antiquated fashion much like the coverture of old. Arguments to keep this definition have brought up procreation, yet have ignored the fact there has never been a requirement to be fertile to have a legal marriage. Testimony in the Prop 8 trial in California pointed out that 38% of all children born in the United States are from unwed parents. So how is procreation necessary for marriage or marriage necessary for procreation? How is same-sex marriage different from an infertile one?

The Right wants the American people to believe that a child needs both a mother and a father. This only reinforces the notion that traditional marriage is necessary to rear children because the mother and the father have roles that must be held. In other words, the mother's place is in the home caring for the children. That is her role.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Walter Barton Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

After 26 years retiring from the Navy, then another 14 years as a psychotherapist retiring again, I have finally found time to be more active.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Effects of Social Institutions on Homosexual Youth

Adultery, a GOP Family Value

The Nuclear Family's Half-Life

David Wood and Mary Jo Sharp: Apologetics Assaulted?

Gay Marriage vs. Civil Unions, a New PEW Poll

The New Coverture, the Right's Answer to Marriage

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend