Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 32 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

The "Iran Attack," Jan. 12, 2016: Whose False Flag, if any?

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 50778
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Steven Jonas
Become a Fan
  (20 fans)

On January 12, 2016, it was reported that Iran had detained two small U.S. vessels which, they claimed, were picked up in Iranian territory, one or both having reported mechanical difficulties. It was also reported that the Iranian government said that the vessels (apparently too small to have been called "ships") would be returned to U.S. hands "shortly." An "innocent mistake?" Surely it could have been. But given that it just happened to have occurred on the day of President Barack Obama's last State of the Union Address, and given that there are a number of forces around the world which would like nothing better, post hoc, than to undermine his historic Iran Nuclear Deal, it surely could have been something else. "Surely you're not thinking of aa false flag attack, are you?" an interlocutor might ask. Well yes, that's exactly what I'm thinking about.

Let me just list the possible perpetrators here. If more information comes out, we can into further details at a later date. First of all, the Republican Party is totally opposed to the Deal, because A) it is a major feather in President Obama's cap, B) it might somehow help bring peace to at least part of the Middle East lessening the chances for the Permanent War they are so much in favor of, and C) their Middle Eastern wing (or is it the other way 'round), the Israeli-/Likud government, is totally opposed to it for their own reasons. Second of all, there are the righty-wing elements in Iran which are opposed to the deal, starting with the Revolutionary Guard and the Iranian right-wing military-industrial complex sector of the Iranian ruling class that they represent. Third of all, there is the Israeli government/Israeli Defense Force/Israeli military-industrial complex which could have done something like this using Mossad. Finally, back in 2006 Seymour Hersh published an article in The New Yorker in which he claimed that Bush/Cheney were supporting an anti-government guerrilla movement with in Iran. They were known as the "Mujaheddin-e Khalg" (known as the MEK or MKO in the West). Remnants of them may still be in existence inside Iran. Given their possible connections with Bush/Cheney, they would certainly have a reason to try to show up President Obama on this particular day.

And it is that this day is a particular one that raises this whole question. Of course conspiracy theories abound. Many involving the United States --- think Tonkin Gulf, think the original overthrow of the first democratically elected Iranian government in 1953, think "bay of Pigs," think the Allende coup, think "Iran-Contra," think George Bush I tricking Iraq into attacking Kuwait in 1991, and so on and so forth --- have been proven to correct. Others, such as Obama's "Plan to Grab all Your Guns" are the stuff of total fiction. But there are certainly a variety of interested parties that could have pulled off this very peculiarly-timed event.

Fortunately, the Iranian government intervened very quickly and the vessels and crews were to be quickly returned to U.S. control. But questions do remain, don't they? One being, will some Republican shout out about the incident during the President's State of the Union Address.


Rate It | View Ratings

Steven Jonas Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Steven Jonas, MD, MPH, MS is a Professor Emeritus of Preventive Medicine at StonyBrookMedicine (NY) and author/co-author/editor/co-editor of over 35 books. In addition to his position on OpEdNews as a "Trusted Author," he is a Senior Editor, (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Pope Francis and Change in the Roman Catholic Church

Limbaugh, Santorum, Sex, and the Origins of the Roman Catholic Church

The "Irrepressible Conflict" and the Coming Second Civil War

Gay Marriage and the Constitution

The Republican Party and the Separation of Church and State: Change Does Happen

What the Gunners Want: What's in Rick Perry's Pocket, Unlimited

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: